Reseñas de usuarios

The fairly low prize money for the competitive rounds seems reasonable because of the need to increase with each round to enable "come from behind" scenarios and because it feels uncomfortable enough for $300 to be the reward for the right answer to a kooky question that has to be a complete 50-50 guess -- if they raised the $100 amounts, then they'd have to raise the $200 amounts and the $300 amounts. Also, it is probably easier for the loser to go home with nothing when the winner didn't get that much anyway.

However, I would really enjoy the show better if they changed the ultimate (winner only) round to allow the contestant to win $1,000 if they get the first question right, another $2,000 if they get the second question right, and an additional $3,000 if they get the third question right. I would also prefer that they make that last question something that maybe 15% to 25% of people would actually know instead of making it something that only maybe 5% of people would actually know, as well as maybe a modicum of logic being able to be applied to it.

As for the jokes -- I enjoy those a lot, even the "groaners". Don't some people realize that those are part of comedy tradition? I hope they have subsequent seasons and that they get the next one out soon enough that multiple reruns of the existing episodes don't turn off so many viewers that they start thinking of that show as something they don't watch instead of something they do.

I admire the improv speed with which the comics come up with something on the spot, UNLESS they know beforehand what their question will be; I started suspecting that when most qs to Byron Allen involve viagra! Actually all of them do go to Allen! I agree it's really cheap money compared to other shows, especially loser gets nothing, and to turn the knife in the wound Kelly reiterates to the winner that game money is theirs to keep!. I think it's the comics who command the majority of the budget even though in the end they only answer 3 questions!. But it is rather new so I'll give them a break to improve their budget. Some of u think it copies Hollywood squares (9 comics) but is more a reboot of original " funny you should ask " in the 50"s black and white Era of television, and back then the winnings were better!!!Lol!!

We, friends and family, all agree that you should give the loser of the game $200 at least... so they can pay for their hotel room that they paid for to be on the show...... We dont like the fact that they walk away with nothing. Ty

It is a cute show but I think that the "loser" should keep the money they won and the winner keeps the money they won and have a chance to win $5k which is pitiful. At least make it $10 k which is still lower than all other game shows. Looks like they have a very small budget and it shows. It makes the Emcee look ridiculous making the $5k the highlight of the show... justmyopinion

Comedians are funny sometime but definitely look as if they are totally bored and wish they had something else to do. 5k is also a joke for money to win, host makes it sound like its 50k they are going to win. Also odds of answering that last question is a joke. Not sure how it's still on TV.

Should be paying the contestants more. Loser goes home with nothing. Winner takes home peanuts. Show only exists to give washed-up comics rent money.

I do not understand how this show is not more popular. I DVR several episodes each day and start my mornings with some trivia and great hokey jokeys. It puts a smile on my brain. It amazes me that while the show is diverse in ethnicities there are never any older contestants and they all seem quite attractive.

The credits state Byron Allen is the creator. Just a cheap imitation of Hollywood Squares. Has anyone else noticed the camera angle on host's tight pants and bulge (Not an accident)? The alleged contestants are only young and good looking, not a chance of a pudgy middle age housewife being selected to be a contestant. I hate people are stupid enough to enrich Byron Allen for this. The prize money is almost as ridiculous as the contestants plans for the money. The only thing I can say nice about it is the show gives a chance to fading stars to work again. I hope Mr. Allen isn't ripping them off with their salaries.

We need more mindlessly entertaining game shows and less politically-driven talk shows and this game show fits the bill perfectly. Produced by Byron Allen and hosted by the fresh-faced John Kelly, it asks somewhat intelligent trivia questions with answers provided by 6 of today's wacky stand-up comedians, among the likes of Jon Lovitz, Bill Bellamy, Louie Anderson and Gabriel "Fluffy" Iglesias. I'm happy it got recently renewed for 2 more seasons; catch it sometime late night or afternoons on your favorite UHF tv station.

The reviews for this prove it! Yes it's basically a midday game show. Yes the prize money isn't a lot. Yes it's mostly past their prime comedians. Yes they all have the answers and jokes written/rehearsed for them! There's nothing new here, it is the same format as Hollywood Squares. But you know what? All the negatives fit the old game shows like it too! Charlie Weaver, Paul Lind, Rose Marie were all past starring in stuff too. But people loved those old game shows! Match game actually restored some people's fame! Everybody chose the same guy for the final answer, Richard Dawson over and over, and he eventually became iconic-ally beloved on Family Feud. But as a half hour escape, it is serviceable. Louie Anderson is very funny, Tom Arnold loves to point out he's stupidly married 4 times. The only real negative for me is the final question is like final Jeopardy champions tournament level hard. You're only going to get that by wildly guessing right! But c'mon people stop condemning it for being exactly what it is supposed to be! A low budget campy giggles daytime filler show. There are/is far worse high budget Network crap out there. That ridiculously bad Kiki Micheal and Sarah show that last like what, a few weeks? Sheesh!

This show is pretty dumb. The "funny" answers are not, but even more annoying than those unfunny answers are the reactions of the other celebrities on the show. They laugh like these answers are the funniest lines they've ever heard! Good grief, Char...well, you know. And that life-changing jackpot of $5,000? It is incredibly cheap! Then, to make that last question impossible to answer, unless you're a very lucky guesser, just proves how low-rent it truly is. I only keep it on for background noise now. It truly sucks.

I have never seen so many negative reviews of a show. I really like this show, it is funny and clever, and you learn a lot of interesting obscure facts. What's not to like ?? Maybe the prize money is kind of low but it is ENTERTAINMENT !!!

Yes, for those old enough, this show invites comparisons with Hollywood Squares. I'm not a game show fan, but I liked Hollywood Squares and watched it as often as I could (it was a daytime show, and I usually had a day job).

'Funny You Should Ask' can be considered a lower-budget variation of the Hollywood Squares theme, but with six comics providing multiple answers every show, there's plenty of opportunity for hilarious mirth. And they deliver.

Two competing contestants, always a male and a female, try to choose the correct answer provided by the panel of comedians. General topic questions, ranging from culture and society to history and science, are posed, and the comics give a funny answer as a first response, then give their final answer, which may be either true or a bluff.

What is so challenging about the questions is they cover such a wide variety of specialized and esoteric topics, so that often the most logical answer is false and the most bizarre answer is true. Yet, the better-learned contestants will have better odds at winning because correct answers can sometimes be deduced from the questions.

The progressive 3-tiered structure of the show is interesting because each episode provides the chance for serious come-from-behind winning dynamics.

Jon Kelley is as good as game show hosts can get. Perfect for this program.

Hopefully, this show will endure and grow, with the winning purses increasing over time, as well.

C'mon, up the ante a bit! $5000 is really a joke compared to most game shows. The loser should be able to keep the money they earned during the game as well. After all it is always below $1000.

People keep complaining about the $5,000 jackpot being too cheap. My family was on Family Feud and won $10,000 which is made into a huge deal and that is split between 5 people!!

The so called joke answers are horrible. I don't know why anyone would watch this show.

This is a sad excuse for comedic show. At most, you get a dad joke/pun that makes you think "oh that's witty, I guess" The host is pretty annoying. When Jackie is on the show he repeatedly shouts "JAH-KAY" and its so unfunny it feels like I'm watching a "comedy" video from Instagram. I can almost guarantee you the audience is paid to laugh, which is probably why the prize money is so small. The budget for the show is so low that when the loser leaves, they leave with NOTHING. Well actually that's not true; the loser leaves with embarrassment for being on such a bad show. I'm just going to list a bunch of things that show how low-budget this show is: 1) There is no inspiration or or effort put into the stage where the show takes place. *not enough money for a good setup* 2) The "smash hit line of comics" are just a bunch of old people that used to be in sitcoms and don't know the first thing about making people laugh. (sitcoms, as in unfunny, boring shows where 24% of the episode is taken up by laugh tracks placed at what are considered to be "jokes" I guess.) *not enough money to hire actually funny people* 3) Loser gets nothing *not enough money to even pay for their hotel* 4) The big prize money is only 5 grand. (Host announces it like it is a new car/$50,000.) *not enough money to give out anything worth going for* 5) They literally use the horrible song "Happy" from that horrible artist Pharrell Williams, from that horrible movie Despicable Me 2, from that horrible entertainment company Illumination. *not enough money to hire a composer that will make the theme memorable and not make you want to pluck out your eardrums*

Anyway, let me complain some more. Every time the comics tell a "funny" answer, everyone in the audience, the host, the contestants,and the comics laugh like they just heard the most hilarious thing in the world. (personally I have a theory that the more they laugh, the more they get paid. It's really the only reasonable explanation.)

Recap of why much I despise this show: 1) Not funny 2) Bad host 3) Loser leaves with nothing 4) Low-budget 5) Everyone laughs too much for it to be natural.

Never watch this. You are welcome for the warning :D

I think the jokes are funny and I learn alotta CRAZY trivia.. Sometimes my "would be" responses are similar to the jokes. The actors kinda oversell it sometimes but I watch it weekly.

What a cheap-ass show, and the final questions to win the cheap-ass $5000.00 are impossible to answer...we have never seen anyone win. My husband likes the comedians so we have it on...we're retired!

What happened to silliness? Of course the big win is small, of course the funny answers (and they are funny) are rehearsed, of course the stars are older. These people have made their money and don't need to make millions every time they show their faces. It is the only thing I turn the TV on for in the afternoon. Those who have such bad things to say about this show should just chill and enjoy a bit of silliness. Kudos to the whole cast.

Incredibly unfunny and overly hyped. The theory in our household is that the show exists only so that the studio can honour contracts with fallen 'stars' who are just too bad to go on anything else. This show is on before one of our favourites and it is always muted to spare us the excruciating cringe factor.

I don't get the negative reviews, this is one of the funniest game shows there is, and the comedians are top notch! Really a fun show......

Just like in the old Hollywood Squares celebrities are asked questions (with mostly sexual connotations). They first make a joke ( mostly with sexual connotations) then try to answer it. The two contestants have to decide whether the celebrity is right or wrong. Most of the show is watching the celebs laugh at each others jokes. The budget is obviously low because the " grand prize" is only $5000. Probably not the worst way to spend 30 minutes.

I get so tired of every question being preceded by another intro and applause for the celebrity giving the joke. Feed those egos.