PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,5/10
496
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una joven pareja compra la casa de sus sueños en Nueva Orleans, pero será atormentada por una madre obsesiva que cree que la casa debe ser suya.Una joven pareja compra la casa de sus sueños en Nueva Orleans, pero será atormentada por una madre obsesiva que cree que la casa debe ser suya.Una joven pareja compra la casa de sus sueños en Nueva Orleans, pero será atormentada por una madre obsesiva que cree que la casa debe ser suya.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Terese Aiello
- Madison Dupree
- (as Terese G. Aiello)
David A Cole
- Thom Wade
- (as David Anthony Cole)
Tony Beard
- Tony
- (as Tony L. Beard)
Escalante Lundy
- Eddie
- (as Escalate Lundy)
Raylee Magill
- Diana Vick
- (as Rachael Lee Magill)
Reseñas destacadas
Wasn't sure what to expect but when YouTube adds it automatically and you are too sleepy to change you watch what YouTube suggests. That being said this was not a horrible movie just not good. It was not bad enough toake me turn it off and at least I did not feel robbed of time.
I actually just deleted my original review and decided instead to say don't bother. This is just not a good thriller. I don't have LMN but I would assume that to keep that network going, they have to churn out a lot of movies, even the ones that belong in the scrap pile. I just FF to get to the end, and what a mess. Perhaps on paper it was better, but the execution left a lot to be desired.
A lot of this movie makes zero sense. The police are useless and condescending. A woman is upset over being outbid on a gorgeous home, and the new owner rejects her offer to buy it. This rejection turns into an obsession w/destroying the husband and pregnant wife who now live in the house. I mean, it's not justified at all.
This neighborhood has a welcoming committee and most of Crazy's deeds were done in daylight...no one saw her? There are plenty of signs that this is a close-knit (or nosy) neighborhood, so I'm not buying it. The house was clearly the "big house" in the neighborhood so I find it hard to believe it didn't draw attention just by existing. I can't remember if the movie said why the mom (can't remember the character's name) was home. She wasn't on bedrest for her pregnancy. Her husband was an ER doctor and was therefore away a lot, but I don't recall seeing her do much to occupy her time. IDK, sometimes characters who just sit around and just have stuff happen irk me.
I think the movie would have been better if it had taken the time to do a slow burn of the harassment. The drama started on Halloween, so a tame prank would have been a good start. Instead, she was afraid for her life because Crazy almost broke in, broke stuff, and sent a threatening note. I think instead of going from zero to one hundred, the movie could have taken time to show just how far Madison would go for that house. The listing of the house was also treated like a break-in, so by the time she and her husband started receiving "mail," things had already escalated.
The woman with the obsession was an abused wife and an overwhelmed mother of an autistic (I think) teenager. #1, I think that was done to make her somewhat sympathetic BUT none of it justifies her actions. So it's a bit manipulative to try to make that so, as well as making the husband a larger part of the climax than he was the entire rest of the movie. Additionally, given her circumstances, I don't understand why she wanted that house. Edit: now that I've seen the ending, her craziness over the house is all her...husband is in jail, daughter is living with grandma, and she still wants the house. So the ending negates everything.
That ending...UGH! I know it's a Lifetime staple trope, but does Crazy Madison really think none of the neighbors will know her after everything?
Give it a miss.
A lot of this movie makes zero sense. The police are useless and condescending. A woman is upset over being outbid on a gorgeous home, and the new owner rejects her offer to buy it. This rejection turns into an obsession w/destroying the husband and pregnant wife who now live in the house. I mean, it's not justified at all.
This neighborhood has a welcoming committee and most of Crazy's deeds were done in daylight...no one saw her? There are plenty of signs that this is a close-knit (or nosy) neighborhood, so I'm not buying it. The house was clearly the "big house" in the neighborhood so I find it hard to believe it didn't draw attention just by existing. I can't remember if the movie said why the mom (can't remember the character's name) was home. She wasn't on bedrest for her pregnancy. Her husband was an ER doctor and was therefore away a lot, but I don't recall seeing her do much to occupy her time. IDK, sometimes characters who just sit around and just have stuff happen irk me.
I think the movie would have been better if it had taken the time to do a slow burn of the harassment. The drama started on Halloween, so a tame prank would have been a good start. Instead, she was afraid for her life because Crazy almost broke in, broke stuff, and sent a threatening note. I think instead of going from zero to one hundred, the movie could have taken time to show just how far Madison would go for that house. The listing of the house was also treated like a break-in, so by the time she and her husband started receiving "mail," things had already escalated.
The woman with the obsession was an abused wife and an overwhelmed mother of an autistic (I think) teenager. #1, I think that was done to make her somewhat sympathetic BUT none of it justifies her actions. So it's a bit manipulative to try to make that so, as well as making the husband a larger part of the climax than he was the entire rest of the movie. Additionally, given her circumstances, I don't understand why she wanted that house. Edit: now that I've seen the ending, her craziness over the house is all her...husband is in jail, daughter is living with grandma, and she still wants the house. So the ending negates everything.
That ending...UGH! I know it's a Lifetime staple trope, but does Crazy Madison really think none of the neighbors will know her after everything?
Give it a miss.
The very beginning of the film states it was based on a true story. That I find impossible to believe. A woman with a crippled husband and autistic daughter seriously want this house that she looks at but is out bid by someone else: Mrs Vogue and her doctor husband. While the story unfolds, much of the script and acting is so awful that I thought it was a bad joke. The scene of all the neighbours accusing Vogue of sending letters to them, and suddenly all friends when a party was announced. I've seen school plays with better acting than this! I'm sure my pet budgie could write a better script than this. None of this made sense. A poor woman voted Mother of the Year is truly a victim of domestic violence, she has to care for her daughter and also put up with her raging husband. However, this woman is the film's apex monster. They could've given her fangs or made her cast spells to make this slightly better! Instead I felt quite sorry for her. This TV movie is like junk food, it's bad although you can't stop watching it.
This is the best movie to fall asleep to. I start watching it and immediately feel like I took a sleeping pill. The acting is bad, the flyovers are overused and the story is unbelievable. I know it's based on true events, but this has to be exaggerated.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesOne of several films loosely based on Kathy Rowe, a middle-aged woman convicted of harassing the couple that outbid her on a San Diego house in 2011.
- Citas
Destiny Dupree: Don't hit mamas. No, don't.
- ConexionesReferenced in Half in the Bag: Snow Falls (2023) (2023)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 30 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was La casa de tus sueños (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde