Graffiti

Anna came into Edgar's home several times without either him or his dog sensing her presence. Why didn't she reveal herself earlier when she could see he was harmless? Did Edgar's isolation drive him to imagine Anna's existence and subconsciously act out her side of the conversation?

This is my first review ever, but I just had to say this is what film making should look like. This is what it is supposed to be and what was intended for. I just have to compliment this hoping that it will encourage other projects like this.

I have to admit that I watched this by accident when my infant daughter was playing with the remote and stopped at the beginning of this film. She must have been enchanted by the music score which is absolutely beautiful. I stopped what I was doing, feeling drawn to it, just like she did. I was hung to my chair and watched filled with hope and compassion for the protagonist, made me also think about all the harm that we are doing to our planet and that this scenario could be real some day, what a dreadful thought that was.. But mostly it moved me. Touched me deeply.

The scenery and music are stunning. The acting is powerful, it really is considering that the actor had almost no lines whatsoever, no interactions at all, and with his deep eyes and that sweet little dog managed to speak volumes on humanity's nature. My compliments to all those who made this happen. Thank you.

The short film Graffiti takes us on a journey through the life of a young man named Edgar who is left alone, hopeless in a city evacuated due to a tragic accident. The viewers have no background information about the man or the city other than the fact that "the incident" occurred 7 years ago. Edgar was somehow left behind and is now alone in the unknown city with only his Dog keeping him company. We also see that during the day he goes out into the city to search for things he can take home with him like books and resources such as canned foods and water. As he walks through the town, he also carries a radiation detector and spray paint when he enters buildings, and marks an asterix where it is contaminated and an O where it is safe. One day he comes home, and finds "ANNA" spray painted on one of his walls. At first he was startled, but then he realized that the name meant that he isn't in this city alone. From there on out Edgar and Anna start communicating through the wall, but Edgar never sees Anna.

In my opinion, the film Graffiti was very well done. Everything from the somber lighting and isolated wide shots to the insight into Edgar's life through experiencing it with him, was executed tastefully and with purpose. With every new shot and scene there were endless symbols left for analysis by the director. Even what seemed to be small details such as gloomy trees in the background were carefully articulated. Right from the beginning of the film they were obstructing the environment around them and drew attention to themselves by how much of the shot they took up in multiple scenes. In my mind, they also served as a symbol. Trees usually symbolize life and growth whereas in the film they all seem dead in a place of decay and destruction. It shows a juxtaposed meaning with not only the trees but the city, as a symbol of something that once thrived and held life which is now left deserted and forgotten.

Another notable thing to mention was the fact that almost everything in the film was left to the viewer's interpretation, which was very clearly made to do so. The director meant to make a very observable film to grab a viewer's attention by using suspense and making them think on every detail they otherwise wouldn't look twice at. Such as Edgar's relationship with Anna. From the start we know that Edgar is lacking a companion in his life, so when he starts communicating with Anna he starts to gain hope in what he thought was a hopeless, lonely world. Things seemed to be looking up for him, Anna seemed to help him survive. But as the film progresses, the possibility of Anna being real decreases and the likelihood that Edgar is imagining her as a coping mechanism increases. It puts the viewer at a crossroads on what to believe. It makes you look at everything and analyze it, looking for anything that hints at what's really happening. There was never a definitive answer on the reality of the events, only symbols and hidden meaning with which viewers could choose to piece together to form a conclusive ending. That's what I found so interesting about the way Graffiti was made, every individual watching has their own experiences and thoughts which they use to form a view of the film. Every person's interpretation will be different, and therefore the plot of the film has endless ways of unraveling.

Graffiti was filmed in Chernobyl which I find very significant to the film and the tone that it's set in. The Chernobyl disaster took place in 1986 in the town of Pripyat, found in northern Ukraine. It was a nuclear tragedy which left nearly 14,000 people evacuating their homes and leaving everything behind out of fear of their belongings being contaminated by radiation. The tragedy, along with the fact that nearly everything was left as is, sets a very eerie setting for the film and establishes a sense of mystery while invoking feeling in viewers.

Lluis Quilez, the director of the short film Graffiti stated in an interview that his intent with the film was to "talk about the Platonic or idealized love for someone whom you can not see". I think that he achieved this beautifully. His universalized ideas and concepts reiterate this idea of love with a hidden person by taking viewers through the intriguing love story of Edgar and Anna. In the film, when Edgar started communicating with Anna through graffiti on the wall, I immediately thought of technology and social media. Currently, almost everyone communicates through the internet in one way or another. There are countless dating apps, websites, and social media outlets out there which are used daily by the majority of the world's population. So many people meet and in some cases fall in love over texting online, and like Edgar with the graffiti, oftentimes it is mainly through a barrier. Whether it be a screen or a wall, you have no idea who is on the other side. It can be who you think it is but it can also be someone completely different from what you thought. This furthers the idea of idealized love established by Quilez where an individual falls in love with someone who they don't truly know. On one hand it shows that love is border-less and possible even when you don't fully know a person, but on the other hand, not entirely knowing who you are communicating with can be a disappointment when you uncover the reality.

I would highly recommend this film to mystery lovers and people who enjoy analysis, because within the short 30 minutes in which this film takes place, there is so much to unpack and think about. The entire plot and especially the ending is inconclusive, there is no definitive answer for anything which means you get to analyze and interpret the film and it's ending as you see fit. Even though I love this film, I understand why others wouldn't. A lot of people like to know what's happening during a film and have a happy, or at least conclusive ending, but the ending of Graffiti ends with an unbelievable cliffhanger that leaves you at the edge of your seat. The film also has a mysterious feel to it which some viewers who prefer happier films may not like as it leaves you with an eerie feeling and uncertainty.

The short film Graffiti displays a man who has been stuck for many years alone in an abandoned area contaminated with radioactivity. Lluís Quílez gives us very little information about the reasons behind the man's situation. The man is alone and has somehow managed to survive for seven years on limited resources. I really enjoyed the setting as it is based in Chernobyl and it is chilling to see it in modern times. The camera crew and the actors had to potentially expose themselves to radioactivity to film this which creates a real sense of danger especially those who are educated on the nuclear accident.

In the film, it seems this place can make you sick but it is never explained what the sickness does or why there is a reason to fear it. I am personally not a fan of the lack of clarification cause I found myself thinking about these questions and it kind of took me away from what was happening on the screen.

The wide shots used to display many shots throughout this film serves to encompass a sense of isolation and seclusion. This shot is used in the opening scenes where the man is seen pleasuring himself to a faded billboard showing a woman's legs in pantyhose. I think that the fact that this billboard only shows a woman's legs leaving out a face really displays the man's desire for anything even remotely womanly or romantic. When the word ANNA appears in graffiti on a wall, he is so willing to make sacrifices for this person and is so desperate to meet her that he doesn't stop to think about how he really knows nothing about this person. She has no face just like the billboard. The question arises of what if this person isn't who he is romanticizing in his mind. Would he still have the same desire to sacrifice things for her? Would he begin to regret past decisions?

As the conversation written in graffiti between the two continues it becomes very ambiguous of if this person really exists. At times it seems like surely she exists and other times things begin to feel a little off. I really like the sense of mystery and tension that builds as the story progresses and the desire to know the truth.

Nearing the end things start to lose clarification and become very ambiguous. I like very plot based stories that end with all loose ends tied up into a little bow. This story didn't do that for me. I was left with many questions. I think this film would be a good fit for someone who likes to use their imagination and explore many different ideas. Personally my brain hurt from thinking of all the unanswered questions at the end so it wasn't a good fit for me although I do think there is a certain audience for this type of film. That being said I would still recommend this film as it kept me entertained and I enjoyed it for the most part.

It is so damn hard to review Short Films for me. I mean, it's by and large fun to watch them. The challenge lies in trying to generate a lot to say about not a lot of movie.

Such is the case with the half-hour short "Graffiti". First of all, this is a production that extends a good ten minutes beyond what is reasonably requisite in order to effectively tell the story here. That narrative being a guy who is not certain if he is the last human on earth seven years after an apocalyptic "incident", apparently of a catastrophically nuclear nature.

Director and Co-Writer/Producer Lluis Quilez gives us far to many shots establishing that this despondent and solitary man, Edgar (Oriol Pla, resembling a young John Stamos, who himself resembles the actual PRESENT-DAY John Stamos), has been sentenced to an existence of desperately lonely and empty days. And the somber mood generated by Arnau Bataller's morose musical accompaniment supplies a more than sufficient cue that we as an audience should be filled to overflowing with feelings saturated with the somber and serious. Edgar is continuously shown bearing the brunt of another brutally harsh winter entrapped within a completely gutted and empty city while trudging about in a joyless effort to determine if the radiation levels in the dilapidated structures threatening to crumble down on top of him are safe for entry (Pripyat, the Ukrainian city most egregiously impacted by the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown crisis of 1986, provides the primary setting). After a few of these grimly stark scenes we do come to get it, Mr. Quilez. Edgar's life is the total sh--s and there is little hope that it's ever gonna get any better. In fact, it's an absolute wonder that this poor fellow is even still motivated to remain clinging to life at all, such as it is. Which I suppose touches on the apparent theme of the innately powerful longing for human touch alive in us all. But still, there's really no point in beating the set-up to this eternal truth to death, is there?

So as not to potentially spoil what I found to be a nearly entirely nonsensical and unsatisfying denouement, suffice to say that Edgar may or may not have discovered a reason to carry on.

But by this time "Graffiti" has carried on for far longer than has our inspiration to truly care.