Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.Un robo de diamantes reúne a ilusionistas retirados de los Horsemen con los nuevos artistas Greenblatt, Smith y Sessa mientras atacan a peligrosos criminales.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
- $50,000 Bucks Audience Member
- (as Angela Stander)
Resumen
Reseñas destacadas
I did enjoy the cast reunion - Isla Fisher back in action was a pleasant surprise but beyond that, everything was just... plain. If you're going to make fans wait nearly a decade, at least give us something worth the wait, not a rerun in a new hat.
The only illusion here is thinking this sequel was worth the wait.
The new magicians lack depth... their skills and personalities aren't well-established, so it's hard to care. The original Horsemen (all five now) are still charismatic, but their roles feel sidelined in favor of underdeveloped newcomers.
The final heist is visually impressive but lacks the satisfying payoff of the first two films. The twists feel forced, and the revenge-driven plot drags down the fun.
That said, it's not a bad movie - just a missed opportunity. If you loved the first two, you'll find enough spectacle to enjoy, but don't expect the same magic.
6/10: A decent weekend watch, but nothing more.
But the writers, director and producers GROSSLY overproduce this flashy sequel to the max. Isla fisher wears a fancy dress in the woods or in action sequences that make your eyes roll. ANY REALISM from filmmakers would help.
For adult, the movie often feels closer to reality-show spectacle-think Masked Singer meets America's Got Talent-than a grounded cinematic story. Your magicians fight WWII Evil. The sets and character design are impressive, but the nonstop implausible stunts and plot holes make it hard to stay invested in the world they're trying to build.
Still, if you overlook the "jump-the-shark" magic moments and just enjoy the popcorn-movie chaos, it's entertaining enough. My daughter gave it an A. I landed on a B mostly thanks to Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg, who bring enough charm and humor to offset the rapid-fire absurdity. (We completed premier with Cinemascore voting.)
Like many sequels since the '80s, it tries to do too much-too many new characters, too much flash, too much caffeine-and in the process loses warmth, character focus, and believability. But it is entertainment, and we're glad we saw it in a theater, where the spectacle feels bigger and more fun than it would on a streaming screen.
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWhen Veronika enters her secret caveau we can see a painting held there: that's Caravaggio's "Nativity", stolen in Palermo, Italy in 1969, and never retrieved.
- PifiasAt 1:30 during the sand trap escape, all the water empties from the sand trap through the broken glass wall, and all the sand in the trap is no longer there.
- Citas
Charlie: How did you... find us?
J. Daniel Atlas: I don't know, took me about... 30 seconds And if it was this easy for me to find you, how hard would it be for the police?
June: Whoa, hold on, the police?
J. Daniel Atlas: Yeah, the police.
Bosco: Why would the police be looking for us?
J. Daniel Atlas: Uh, I don't know, what about that little heist you just pulled? Or... the fact that you're squatting in this place, so that your electricity comes from the circuit box in the corner, I don't know, could be anything, am I right, Bozo?
Bosco: [chuckles] Bosco. Bosco Leroy.
J. Daniel Atlas: [chuckles] Oh yes that's right, Bosco Leroy. What, did you type "fictional magician name" into ChatGPT?
Bosco: No, that's actually my real name, Atlas. What'd your mom have sex with a map?
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Must Watch Movies and Shows of November 2025 (2025)
- Banda sonoraCrusades
Written by Max Bassin, Dominic DiGesu, Emily Green (as Gus Green), Foster Hudson and Cameron Winter
Performed by Geese
Courtesy of Partisan Records/PIAS
Selecciones populares
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
- How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Now You See Me: Now You Don't
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Bélgica(Exterior)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 90.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 61.719.268 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 21.013.793 US$
- 16 nov 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 216.541.395 US$
- Duración
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1






