Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven dejan Arendelle para viajar a un antiguo bosque otoñal de una tierra encantada. Se proponen encontrar el origen de los poderes de Elsa para salvar su reino.Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven dejan Arendelle para viajar a un antiguo bosque otoñal de una tierra encantada. Se proponen encontrar el origen de los poderes de Elsa para salvar su reino.Anna, Elsa, Kristoff, Olaf y Sven dejan Arendelle para viajar a un antiguo bosque otoñal de una tierra encantada. Se proponen encontrar el origen de los poderes de Elsa para salvar su reino.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Nominado para 1 premio Óscar
- 18 premios y 95 nominaciones en total
Kristen Bell
- Anna
- (voz)
Idina Menzel
- Elsa
- (voz)
Alfred Molina
- Agnarr
- (voz)
Jason Ritter
- Ryder
- (voz)
Ciarán Hinds
- Pabbie
- (voz)
Alan Tudyk
- Guard
- (voz)
- …
Santino Fontana
- Hans
- (sonido de archivo)
Livvy Stubenrauch
- Young Anna
- (sonido de archivo)
Reseñas destacadas
Frozen II felt unsatisfying. There was lots of build up to a very short climax that felt way too easy and simple. I kept expecting another adventure which never came. The film feels short and unfinished. That said, the animation is absolutely gorgeous and I did find the film quite funny. If you go into this with low expectations I think you'll enjoy yourself.
I'm not sure why some people say it sucked. I went with my nephew and I thought the story was good and kept me intrigued throughout and had so many emotions, great visuals and was as good if not better than the first. I would def. Recommend this movie if you liked the 1st one! The characters from Frozen are awesome!
Not a patch on the first one, no memorable songs, weak and forced storyline. Clearly the writers took what was best from the first and amped it up to the max but forgot that a good film is based on a good story not on a good message.
Six years is not a particularly long time to wait for a sequel, but in the case of Frozen it is hard not to feel that the decision to return was totally motivated by money-making potential and not much else. Of course it is naïve to think that any sequel is made out of love for the audience etc and without money in mind, but usually it doesn't feel so brazen as this; and that impression is not helped by Disney digging up its own back catalogue to remake and resell them. In the meantime Frozen made over a billion dollars, with hit records, merchandise, stage shows etc, so the sequel was not a great surprise - but it is a bit of a disappointment.
The plot is the aspect that hurts it. It feels like it was written by a committee, and puts too much effort into keeping all the characters busy by giving them something to do. As a result the plot feels convoluted due to the number of threads that don't have direct relationship to one another. In addition, the threads themselves have a lot going on that is hard to translate for children - the link to past generations, the origin of powers; all sorts of things like this rob it of impact because it feels less smooth - you can hear the gears grinding as it moves along. There are several strong songs, not quite the strength of the first film but that was a high bar to clear. There are funny moments, but the whole thing does feel less 'fun'.
At the same time my reduced investment in the film meant it had less emotional impact; it doesn't take much for me to get choked up but nothing did anything for me in this one. It wasn't awful of course, just disappointing. It still offers the songs, the laughs, the spectacle but it does it in such a heavy-set way that it doesn't spark or feel organic as it does it - and as a result the feeling gets stronger that this is only really about squeezing more money from the audience.
The plot is the aspect that hurts it. It feels like it was written by a committee, and puts too much effort into keeping all the characters busy by giving them something to do. As a result the plot feels convoluted due to the number of threads that don't have direct relationship to one another. In addition, the threads themselves have a lot going on that is hard to translate for children - the link to past generations, the origin of powers; all sorts of things like this rob it of impact because it feels less smooth - you can hear the gears grinding as it moves along. There are several strong songs, not quite the strength of the first film but that was a high bar to clear. There are funny moments, but the whole thing does feel less 'fun'.
At the same time my reduced investment in the film meant it had less emotional impact; it doesn't take much for me to get choked up but nothing did anything for me in this one. It wasn't awful of course, just disappointing. It still offers the songs, the laughs, the spectacle but it does it in such a heavy-set way that it doesn't spark or feel organic as it does it - and as a result the feeling gets stronger that this is only really about squeezing more money from the audience.
It's not hard to imagine how big this movie will be. I, as well as many others, am a huge fan of the first film and the short films that followed it. Frozen II has a different feel to it. While the first film was brimming with quirky moments, the follow up feels a little more mature in its plot and themes. This story heavily centers around the importance of change, even if that means letting go. Throughout the film, I found myself dazzled with the quality and beauty of the visuals that the animation team laid out. The story, for me, felt a little flat, however. I think the writing team missed the mark when trying to achieve the same quirkiness from the original. With the more dramatic path the writers chose to take, also came more epic musical numbers and effects. Sure there were still plenty of humorous moments, but I personally felt myself longing for more. I also find irony in the fact that this film centers around change and the overall feel of the film felt like a major shift from the first. I do think this film will still appeal to many others and I, myself, am still very excited to watch it a second time. Overall, I'd say this film found success in what it was trying to achieve and the message it was trying to send to its viewers, but couldn't quite live up to the whimsicality of the original. While not as good as the first, it's still a film you will want to take your family to and is a great addition to the Frozen franchise. 7/10
'Frozen II' Cast Discuss Anna and Elsa’s Evolution
'Frozen II' Cast Discuss Anna and Elsa’s Evolution
Kristen Bell and Idina Menzel illustrate some of the more exciting personal challenges that await Anna and Elsa in Frozen II.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe song used to call Elsa to the enchanted forest is a type of Scandinavian herding call called kulning. It was used briefly in the score of the first movie. In Frozen 2, the kulning central to the plot is performed by a Norwegian singer Aurora. The melody used for the kulning is the "dies irae," which, since the 13th-century (or sooner), has referred to the wrath of God's judgment on humanity.
- PifiasWhen Anna tells the Rock Giants to throw their boulders, the first one hits the middle of the bridge, but when Anna is running back to Kristoff and Mattias, that part of the dam is not broken.
- Créditos adicionalesThere is a post-credits scene in which Olaf recaps the events of the film.
- ConexionesEdited into Animazén: Water (2020)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 150.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 477.373.578 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 130.263.358 US$
- 24 nov 2019
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 1.453.683.476 US$
- Duración1 hora 43 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta