PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,0/10
1,6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El novelista primerizo Fenton Dillane, regresa a la ciudad de Nueva York sin previo aviso para enfrentarse a su familia, su ex novia y algunos temores persistentes de la infancia.El novelista primerizo Fenton Dillane, regresa a la ciudad de Nueva York sin previo aviso para enfrentarse a su familia, su ex novia y algunos temores persistentes de la infancia.El novelista primerizo Fenton Dillane, regresa a la ciudad de Nueva York sin previo aviso para enfrentarse a su familia, su ex novia y algunos temores persistentes de la infancia.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Mary-Louise Parker
- Annabel
- (as Mary Louise Parker)
Benja K. Thomas
- Pam
- (as Benja Kay Thomas)
Christopher Lowell
- Victor
- (as Chris Lowell)
Reseñas destacadas
This film tells the story of a young writer, who goes back home to New York to find that his dysfunctional family is falling apart. To top that up, his ex-girlfriend that he cannot get over with is getting married to another guy in a few days.
"Chronically Metropolitan" is basically a showcase of how not to make a film. The plot is boring and tedious. It is just plain and uneventful. Camera work is really plain as there are many long shots showing conversations, and this would have been broken up to close up on the speakers in other films. The point of view for the viewers is almost like an passive bystander, without any engagement with the characters or the situation they are in. The actors are mostly devoid of any emotions, as they sleepwalk through their roles, delivering lines in a passionless and lethargic manner as if they were kids being forced to read texts reluctantly. The only exception is Josh Peck, who at least muster smiles and look energetic in his role. If not for Josh Peck, the film would have been completely bad.
"Chronically Metropolitan" is basically a showcase of how not to make a film. The plot is boring and tedious. It is just plain and uneventful. Camera work is really plain as there are many long shots showing conversations, and this would have been broken up to close up on the speakers in other films. The point of view for the viewers is almost like an passive bystander, without any engagement with the characters or the situation they are in. The actors are mostly devoid of any emotions, as they sleepwalk through their roles, delivering lines in a passionless and lethargic manner as if they were kids being forced to read texts reluctantly. The only exception is Josh Peck, who at least muster smiles and look energetic in his role. If not for Josh Peck, the film would have been completely bad.
Everything that happens in this film is right off the "indie quirky cute funny sad happily ever after wealthy dysfunctional family drama" checklist.
While the story line is unfailingly familiar, the characters are played by mostly engaging actors and the film doesn't bog down in any one place for too long so you are able to watch to the end without getting bored or surprised.
This film was described in one blurb as clever and cynical, and maybe it was back in the '70s, but now it's just tame and typical.
While the story line is unfailingly familiar, the characters are played by mostly engaging actors and the film doesn't bog down in any one place for too long so you are able to watch to the end without getting bored or surprised.
This film was described in one blurb as clever and cynical, and maybe it was back in the '70s, but now it's just tame and typical.
I agree with previous reviews about the coldness of the characters, but l guess the real people who inspired the story are like that. The word 'cynical' is right there in the description so we were kind of warned..
It's very hopeful, the choices Fenton the protagonist makes are changing. Maybe that's not done in the most clever way (: but it is nice.
Of course the cinematography is very fun and draws you in.
Chris Noth is wildly entertaining and lively as a terrible husband and womanizer, not that it is a surprise to be entertained by Noth.
Side note: Seeing Mary-Louise Parker as a desperate housewife was sad, it's not like her......
Of course the cinematography is very fun and draws you in.
Chris Noth is wildly entertaining and lively as a terrible husband and womanizer, not that it is a surprise to be entertained by Noth.
Side note: Seeing Mary-Louise Parker as a desperate housewife was sad, it's not like her......
Slow, plodding, boring, and depressing. I stopped watching half way through, just couldn't take any more "I'm sorry" every other scene.
Instead, go empty the trash and clip your toe nails, at least you'll get something done.
Instead, go empty the trash and clip your toe nails, at least you'll get something done.
I can't decide if this is a failed movie about a dysfunctional family or just a failed movie. There is no plot and the characters are weak and uninteresting. Everybody is so undecided about their lives. And please tell the son to get a haircut. Its not interesting, its annoying. My rating of 7 is overly generous. I watched the whole movie but kept checking the time.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe bottles of beer in front of Fenton and Layla at the restaurant when their father takes them out is Duvel, a slightly sweet Belgian beer with 8.5% alcohol by volume. It is considered somewhat sacrilege to drink it out of the bottle as Layla does as like many Belgian beers, it has its own special glass in which it is supposed to be served to maximize all the characteristics of the beer when drinking it.
- PifiasAnnabel's pony-tailed hair as she waits for a cab in the building's lobby.
- ConexionesReferences El espía que surgió del frío (1965)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Chronically Metropolitan?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Kronik Büyükşehirli
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 21:9
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta