redx1708
Jan. 2006 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen2
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen228
Bewertung von redx1708
Rezensionen87
Bewertung von redx1708
It's probably just me, or the fact that I never really thought that Steve Martin was funny. Same goes for Martin Short. But the show kept coming up in suggestions, so I decided to give it a shot. 1st season wasn't all bad and since it ended with a cliffhanger, I continued with season 2. From the other reviews it seems that those 2 seasons are the best, but when I finish this 2nd season, that's it for me.
It doesn't really work for me, either as a comedy or a "whodunnit". I can see where it's supposed to be funny, but I haven't laughed even once, and as for who's the killer, I lost interest a while ago. There's no real tension building up, only two aged comedians fooling around. Anyway, I'm 2 episodes away from ending season 2, so I'm gonna stick around to the ending. I'll rate it 6, since it's not really bad, but how it got an average 8+ rating is a bigger mystery to me, than who killed who and why.
It doesn't really work for me, either as a comedy or a "whodunnit". I can see where it's supposed to be funny, but I haven't laughed even once, and as for who's the killer, I lost interest a while ago. There's no real tension building up, only two aged comedians fooling around. Anyway, I'm 2 episodes away from ending season 2, so I'm gonna stick around to the ending. I'll rate it 6, since it's not really bad, but how it got an average 8+ rating is a bigger mystery to me, than who killed who and why.
This is not really a bad movie, but it's not a good one either.
It does however have some good ideas popping up once in a while, but they kinda just get caught up in a messy script. I suppose it's meant to be a satire of woke, but then it also wants to be an action movie.
The problem is that there's too many loose ends. Things that are never explained.
What's the corporation where Swank is the CEO ? Who is Crystal ? She mentions having served in Afghanistan, but no ordinary soldier posesses the combat skills that she clearly has.
And since they obviously ran thorough background checks on all the victims, including photos, is it really believable that they somehow got her mixed up with somebody else ? And if they did, then who is she really ?
So while I have to admit that I found it entertaining, it's also a gigantic mess of a story. In fact it's more of a mess than a story.
I'll rate it just one click above average.
It does however have some good ideas popping up once in a while, but they kinda just get caught up in a messy script. I suppose it's meant to be a satire of woke, but then it also wants to be an action movie.
The problem is that there's too many loose ends. Things that are never explained.
What's the corporation where Swank is the CEO ? Who is Crystal ? She mentions having served in Afghanistan, but no ordinary soldier posesses the combat skills that she clearly has.
And since they obviously ran thorough background checks on all the victims, including photos, is it really believable that they somehow got her mixed up with somebody else ? And if they did, then who is she really ?
So while I have to admit that I found it entertaining, it's also a gigantic mess of a story. In fact it's more of a mess than a story.
I'll rate it just one click above average.
Kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen
5 Gesamtzahl der durchgeführten Umfragen