missmishka
Juli 2005 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen2
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Rezensionen23
Bewertung von missmishka
I honestly had no to low expectations for this going in knowing only the bare minimum about it. I never expected it to hit so hard, but, by Gods, it is beautiful. I absolutely loved all the little cameos & Ming-Na Wen is just flawless in everything that she does. Glitter & Doom, though, played by new to me actors definitely make the movie. Which is good because it's all about them.
As someone with both walls & scars, their story just hits all the feels. There really are not alot of movies I consider 10 out of 10. I can always find something to criticize or take a point off for & I could do that here, but I simply don't want to. I just loved this movie. I'm in tears, mostly happy crying, but crying nonetheless. It was such an experience to watch. I hesitated because I thought the song use may be cringe, but it was perfect. This is the kind of story I would 5 star & have the ebook & physical copy of if it were a book. Instead it's a movie & I'm going to need a Blu-ray release so it can never be lost to me on streaming. I'm going to turn right around & watch it again now. It may not be for everyone but it was just the kind of movie that I didn't know I needed right now.
As someone with both walls & scars, their story just hits all the feels. There really are not alot of movies I consider 10 out of 10. I can always find something to criticize or take a point off for & I could do that here, but I simply don't want to. I just loved this movie. I'm in tears, mostly happy crying, but crying nonetheless. It was such an experience to watch. I hesitated because I thought the song use may be cringe, but it was perfect. This is the kind of story I would 5 star & have the ebook & physical copy of if it were a book. Instead it's a movie & I'm going to need a Blu-ray release so it can never be lost to me on streaming. I'm going to turn right around & watch it again now. It may not be for everyone but it was just the kind of movie that I didn't know I needed right now.
I knew it wasn't going to be good, but could never have guessed it would be this bad. Two stars for the fire effects, but 0 stars for any/everything else. This is embarrassing to watch for anyone with any understanding of firefighting, so it just fails in every way it tries to be a drama involving firefighting.
So let's ignore that it's pulling viewers in with the title, like it's anything really to do with the Notre Dame fire. Let's ignore all the "firefighting" scenes spliced in with the melodrama of the characters. The characters are unlikeable. No idea if any of them are based on real people, but I cannot believe that these are the most compelling stories from that day. Everyone has a story from that day and I do not care about any of these. This is the first thing I've ever watched sped up on Netflix and it still didn't end soon enough. It's is so painfully, needlessly drawn out. I hate the editing. I hate the heavyhandedness of the opening and close. I'll be here forever if I go into detail about the storylines I hated. It's not that it's a non-linear, interconnected storyline kind of show. It's how it is written, acted and put together -all fails. Depending on how you view it, you either have firefighting scenes breaking up the character stories or stupid character stories breaking into the action. Why put it together like that? Every single episode has the same issues, it's not even building toward one big event like the fire. The fire is burning all the way through along with the melodrama. The music video montage at the beginning just sets the stage for the confusing multitude of editing choices. I get what they're trying to say with "momentous events." I absolutely do. Why they chose Michael Jackson's death, I have no clue, other than I guess the November 13, 2015 Paris attacks were too recent and sensitive a subject for the overall theme of the series. I've watched the docuseries about those attacks, I know everyone has a story from that night and I feel that's more relevant than MJ's death, but whatever. At the end of this series, Max has replaced his guest book for stories about "Where were you when Michael Jackson died" with "Where were you were you when Notre Dame burnt" then Alice and Max just stare into the camera like "Please clapping now." It is not, for me, the impactful ending they wanted it to be. It just feels more disrespectful to victims and survivors of the 2015 attacks to have this show focus on a celebrity death from 2009 in the US like a pivotal moment in Paris then nothing else of significance happened until the 2019 cathedral fire. I actually think these scattered stories would have come together better among the backdrop of the attacks, but I absolutely agree that that would have been in poor taste to do, but it is in equally poor taste to use the Notre Dame fire in such an overly fictionalized way when they could have created any kind of fictional scenario to tell these stories if it's the stories that mattered. If the fire was meant to be of real importance to the story then it needed to be focused on better and all the other stuff cut down. It could, and should, have just been a movie and I am going to go find the movie other viewers have recommended people watch instead of this. I'm sure they're right.
So let's ignore that it's pulling viewers in with the title, like it's anything really to do with the Notre Dame fire. Let's ignore all the "firefighting" scenes spliced in with the melodrama of the characters. The characters are unlikeable. No idea if any of them are based on real people, but I cannot believe that these are the most compelling stories from that day. Everyone has a story from that day and I do not care about any of these. This is the first thing I've ever watched sped up on Netflix and it still didn't end soon enough. It's is so painfully, needlessly drawn out. I hate the editing. I hate the heavyhandedness of the opening and close. I'll be here forever if I go into detail about the storylines I hated. It's not that it's a non-linear, interconnected storyline kind of show. It's how it is written, acted and put together -all fails. Depending on how you view it, you either have firefighting scenes breaking up the character stories or stupid character stories breaking into the action. Why put it together like that? Every single episode has the same issues, it's not even building toward one big event like the fire. The fire is burning all the way through along with the melodrama. The music video montage at the beginning just sets the stage for the confusing multitude of editing choices. I get what they're trying to say with "momentous events." I absolutely do. Why they chose Michael Jackson's death, I have no clue, other than I guess the November 13, 2015 Paris attacks were too recent and sensitive a subject for the overall theme of the series. I've watched the docuseries about those attacks, I know everyone has a story from that night and I feel that's more relevant than MJ's death, but whatever. At the end of this series, Max has replaced his guest book for stories about "Where were you when Michael Jackson died" with "Where were you were you when Notre Dame burnt" then Alice and Max just stare into the camera like "Please clapping now." It is not, for me, the impactful ending they wanted it to be. It just feels more disrespectful to victims and survivors of the 2015 attacks to have this show focus on a celebrity death from 2009 in the US like a pivotal moment in Paris then nothing else of significance happened until the 2019 cathedral fire. I actually think these scattered stories would have come together better among the backdrop of the attacks, but I absolutely agree that that would have been in poor taste to do, but it is in equally poor taste to use the Notre Dame fire in such an overly fictionalized way when they could have created any kind of fictional scenario to tell these stories if it's the stories that mattered. If the fire was meant to be of real importance to the story then it needed to be focused on better and all the other stuff cut down. It could, and should, have just been a movie and I am going to go find the movie other viewers have recommended people watch instead of this. I'm sure they're right.