aretel
März 2014 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen2
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen27
Bewertung von aretel
Rezensionen23
Bewertung von aretel
Good period film with dissatisfying outcome. Doesn't put the Edwardian English middle class in a complementary light. Disgusting actually, which begs me to ask the question, "was British society in those days completly void of empathy and moral ethics?".
Great cast and cinematography.
Great cast and cinematography.
This film lacks any original plot and or sub plots. The opening scene was the only redeemable part of this film. From there, the story goes nuclear.
In short, it was a RIP off from the film Christine, instead of a car the writer tried to update it by using a cell phone instead. Add a few slasher scenes and that is all you really have; a cheap horror wannabe remake.
I would write further about the lack of character development, the bad acting and writing, but that would take too much effort and would just add to minutes I would never get back.
In short, it was a RIP off from the film Christine, instead of a car the writer tried to update it by using a cell phone instead. Add a few slasher scenes and that is all you really have; a cheap horror wannabe remake.
I would write further about the lack of character development, the bad acting and writing, but that would take too much effort and would just add to minutes I would never get back.
I had high hopes for this film, however, within the first five minutes I knew it was going to be an arduous experience.
There is a term in the film industry call "a slow burn", which describes a film as slow moving, but with a plot that is palatable and engaging. This film did not have the spark big enough to create a "slow burn" that was needed. Simply said, this film was a dud.
This was Alex Pettyfer's first attempt at directing and I know personally, but indirectly, how challenging this can be. Someone should have warned Alex that directing and starring in your first film, unless you are experienced in both capacities, is a recipe for failure and watching this film proves my point.
So why did this film fail? The film's very slow pace and disjointed plot did not provide the viewer with a coherent sense of engagement. The film's slow pace made it difficult to understand the basic premise of the plot, as it was not clear how each scene was significantly related to the next. Sex scenes were "parachuted" into the film without any context or significance, adding to the disjointedness of this film. However, more disturbing to me was that it wasn't clear if all the sex scenes were consensual, which in the "me too movement" doesn't exactly convey the right message. If this film was expected to be cerebral and thought provoking, then it failed miserably.
In fairness to Alex Pettyfer, the film's failings had nothing to do with his acting performance, which was admirable, strong and convincing, and he was rightly cast for the part. In general, the whole cast gave very good performances, which leads me to believe that either the writing or the directing was this film's Achilles heel.
Disclaimer: I only managed to make it through 49 minutes of this film, so my review is based on the first 49 minutes. If you do decide to watch this film and make it past the 49 minute mark, then kudos to you for having more patience and stamina than I did.