MikeHunt1075
Juni 2005 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen9
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen4709
Bewertung von MikeHunt1075
Rezensionen232
Bewertung von MikeHunt1075
On paper this looked to be a great idea for a game. Have a bunch of different ships/vehicles/jet packs you can select and go into battle with each other like most any other multiplayer shooter. However the end result shows the development wasn't quite there yet, or not enough went into it.
Controlling your choice of battler is what brings the game to a screeching halt. Being able to manouver around is a painful task in itself that even with practice does not improve over time.
Each selected mode of transport feels very much the same, apart from the AT-ST which I personally say is the worst choice to use as it gets stuck and very much in need of a reverse walk, instead of getting stuck in corners and needing to be walked forward in a half circle to get back out.
Each transport feels very grounded. You'd expect you'd be able to fly up or down using flying crafts, but no, it acts like a road vehicle with no visible wheels.
The weapon targeting is a joke. Auto aim is unreliable, and you have to be facing your target to hit it... there's no free aim, just auto lock and tap the shoot button. You can't even hold down the button for auto fire, each shot has to be triggered.
It's hard most of the time to even be able to tell what your secondary weapon does. But you basically are only given the option of fire a laser or drop a bomb. Pretty boring for a game like this.
The graphics of the game are pretty good for 1998. The sounds excellent, there's no problem with any of the visuals or audio, its all in the poor controls that let this game down, and also lack of transport choice.
I guess they had to keep it to smaller transports to keep it a battle type of sandbox shooter, but I'd say it was more limitations of the day that prevented it from being expanded into a battle with a choice of larger ships, but there's no excuse why taking control of the Imperial Walkers is not an option. They're in the game, they function, so why can't we take control? Was it because they'd be too slow, or devs lack of imagination to implement something different to the main game, that comes off feeling overall like it should be a couple of mini-games slapped on as bonus content to a much bigger and better game?
Controlling your choice of battler is what brings the game to a screeching halt. Being able to manouver around is a painful task in itself that even with practice does not improve over time.
Each selected mode of transport feels very much the same, apart from the AT-ST which I personally say is the worst choice to use as it gets stuck and very much in need of a reverse walk, instead of getting stuck in corners and needing to be walked forward in a half circle to get back out.
Each transport feels very grounded. You'd expect you'd be able to fly up or down using flying crafts, but no, it acts like a road vehicle with no visible wheels.
The weapon targeting is a joke. Auto aim is unreliable, and you have to be facing your target to hit it... there's no free aim, just auto lock and tap the shoot button. You can't even hold down the button for auto fire, each shot has to be triggered.
It's hard most of the time to even be able to tell what your secondary weapon does. But you basically are only given the option of fire a laser or drop a bomb. Pretty boring for a game like this.
The graphics of the game are pretty good for 1998. The sounds excellent, there's no problem with any of the visuals or audio, its all in the poor controls that let this game down, and also lack of transport choice.
I guess they had to keep it to smaller transports to keep it a battle type of sandbox shooter, but I'd say it was more limitations of the day that prevented it from being expanded into a battle with a choice of larger ships, but there's no excuse why taking control of the Imperial Walkers is not an option. They're in the game, they function, so why can't we take control? Was it because they'd be too slow, or devs lack of imagination to implement something different to the main game, that comes off feeling overall like it should be a couple of mini-games slapped on as bonus content to a much bigger and better game?
Hasn't the world got enough of these damn family sit-com shows where each week it's one issue solved after the other to maintain the perfect family?
This one's just The Winslows, only instead of Urkle, its a dimwit stereo type white couple who play the over the top dumb neighbours who pop by every single day of their lives and tip-toe around some racial topic that is the only time Cedric the "Entertainers" family remind everyone theyre black, the rest of the time you wouldn't recieve any argument that theyre your typical family of any color written by a white Hollywood writer who has never stepped foot into the real world before.
Many I see complaining say the show tries to get racist... no, doing that might actually produce some laughs, instead we get dumb typical sitcom lite issues like a dimwit white woman goes to a black hairdresser and doesn't notice till its completed that she's been givin a black woman's hair style (according the shows words, not mine) and the hairdresser says nothing, no obe in the salon says nothing, but when she goes to her "thank you for awarding me for not being a racist" speech, suddenly a few coloured ladies speak up about it? Lol. They follow it up with how its actually ok, she can wear it like that, she still hides it for her dumb speech.... seriously, this is supposed to be considered funny? Sounds more like someone asked AI to write the humor. An impossible task if you've never tried.
The show is also just like every other typical PG rated sitcom. It's not funny. It relies on a laugh track to trick an audience into thinking something said was meant to be funny, but just like Friends and Seinfeld, no one can ever qoute you a funny line that was ever said. I guess Friends and Seinfeld managed to create memorable qoutes their moronic fans repeat over and over because they heard a laugh track over something stupid like "How you doing?" or "No soup for you" but when you really think about it its more a stupid line than anything actually funny... but even The Neighbourhood doesn't have that going for it. I dare anyone to give me a famous qoute, line, catch phrase or even a classic moment?
It's just another play-it-safe overrated sitcom in the cesspool of the 100s of other shows just like it.
This one's just The Winslows, only instead of Urkle, its a dimwit stereo type white couple who play the over the top dumb neighbours who pop by every single day of their lives and tip-toe around some racial topic that is the only time Cedric the "Entertainers" family remind everyone theyre black, the rest of the time you wouldn't recieve any argument that theyre your typical family of any color written by a white Hollywood writer who has never stepped foot into the real world before.
Many I see complaining say the show tries to get racist... no, doing that might actually produce some laughs, instead we get dumb typical sitcom lite issues like a dimwit white woman goes to a black hairdresser and doesn't notice till its completed that she's been givin a black woman's hair style (according the shows words, not mine) and the hairdresser says nothing, no obe in the salon says nothing, but when she goes to her "thank you for awarding me for not being a racist" speech, suddenly a few coloured ladies speak up about it? Lol. They follow it up with how its actually ok, she can wear it like that, she still hides it for her dumb speech.... seriously, this is supposed to be considered funny? Sounds more like someone asked AI to write the humor. An impossible task if you've never tried.
The show is also just like every other typical PG rated sitcom. It's not funny. It relies on a laugh track to trick an audience into thinking something said was meant to be funny, but just like Friends and Seinfeld, no one can ever qoute you a funny line that was ever said. I guess Friends and Seinfeld managed to create memorable qoutes their moronic fans repeat over and over because they heard a laugh track over something stupid like "How you doing?" or "No soup for you" but when you really think about it its more a stupid line than anything actually funny... but even The Neighbourhood doesn't have that going for it. I dare anyone to give me a famous qoute, line, catch phrase or even a classic moment?
It's just another play-it-safe overrated sitcom in the cesspool of the 100s of other shows just like it.
I wasn't expecting this to be much. But it turned out a bitter better than I did expect, but like every Happy Maddison project, it's unsurprisingly a bunch of recycled jokes attempting to homage the original in an unnessercery sequel Sandlers only doing for the money with a rather weak plot line that only the comedy is going to be its saving grace.
Pro Tour:
Paying tribute to the original cast members no longer with us.
Might ease up the people who always scream out lines and things at Christopher "Shooter McGavin" McDonald on the street and see him in a bit more of a positive light.
Swing & Miss:
Bad casting choice hiring both of Sandlers daughters to play non-sister roles, as one plays his daughter, the other plays a girl in his AA meeting. They look too similar, and it's too distracting to tell them apart. Especially when they look underage and neither look old enough to have a drinking problem.
The Gilmore family just seems to be a watered-down rip-off of the sons of Jim Carey in "Me, Myself & Irene" (2000), and all their jokes are based on their fathers work dances from the original film... as well as a Smokey & The Bandit II (1990) vibe for Happy himself.
Completly pointless casting of Lavell Crawford as Chubbs (Carl Weathers) son who adds nothing of value to either the comedy or plot of the film.
Too much Ben Stiller being his normal overrated self, plus Post Malone? Blurghh.
Pointless Sandler humour that wasn't funny 100 years ago in both Rob Schneider and John Dalys characters. (Enough already)
Overall, it's passable as just an OK film. It's not boring and has a couple of laughs, but nothing classic or memorable. It left me feeling it's not something I'll ever watch again, and it really did not need to be made. It definitely falls into the "MemberBerries" category. It's sure to be found collecting dust right next to Beverlly Hills Cop 4 and Coming 2 America.
Pro Tour:
Paying tribute to the original cast members no longer with us.
Might ease up the people who always scream out lines and things at Christopher "Shooter McGavin" McDonald on the street and see him in a bit more of a positive light.
Swing & Miss:
Bad casting choice hiring both of Sandlers daughters to play non-sister roles, as one plays his daughter, the other plays a girl in his AA meeting. They look too similar, and it's too distracting to tell them apart. Especially when they look underage and neither look old enough to have a drinking problem.
The Gilmore family just seems to be a watered-down rip-off of the sons of Jim Carey in "Me, Myself & Irene" (2000), and all their jokes are based on their fathers work dances from the original film... as well as a Smokey & The Bandit II (1990) vibe for Happy himself.
Completly pointless casting of Lavell Crawford as Chubbs (Carl Weathers) son who adds nothing of value to either the comedy or plot of the film.
Too much Ben Stiller being his normal overrated self, plus Post Malone? Blurghh.
Pointless Sandler humour that wasn't funny 100 years ago in both Rob Schneider and John Dalys characters. (Enough already)
Overall, it's passable as just an OK film. It's not boring and has a couple of laughs, but nothing classic or memorable. It left me feeling it's not something I'll ever watch again, and it really did not need to be made. It definitely falls into the "MemberBerries" category. It's sure to be found collecting dust right next to Beverlly Hills Cop 4 and Coming 2 America.
Kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen
26 Gesamtzahl der durchgeführten Umfragen