imdb-jeroen

I was moved by this film in many ways (even though I saw it dubbed over in German in a German cinema), but one quality stood out to me: the care that had been given to really portraying music in the making: The rehearsal scenes of both the orchestras seemed very real to me, no-one was mimicking to play an instrument, they could all really play and apparently seemed to do so. For real! This is quite exceptional, for it isn't easy to find people who can both act and play an instrument.

The composing scene, with the 'composer' working with pencil and paper on the piano, was the only scene that musically struck me as a bit unrealistic, for it would be hard to find a composer under 50 that doesn't use a computer to write the notes.

It was also really moving to see how even the most different styles in music can travel straight to the heart and have an important function in peoples lives.

For the rest I found the story moving, original and well performed.

Of course it's not always a compliment when someone calls a movie courageous, but in this case it really is. It shows some darker sides of gay culture with a bluntness that we seldomly see, without any judgement, just observing.

To me it also showed that these 'darker sides' of gay eroticism can have their own function in a persons life.

And there's the courage of the two actors that play the main characters, to take on with such intensity parts that have such explicit gay sex and nudity.

I'm particularly impressed with the very subtle, naturalistically introvert acting of Josh Lavery. In my opinion he would very well function in a scala of roles, from action hero to romantic interest, but apparently up until now he has mainly been in what we call 'gay' movies. He also has a very impressive voice.

In one other review the term gaysplectation is mentioned. I can see why, there's a lot of scarcely dressed or bare naked young man to be admired. But I think the term doesn't do right to the movie, because of the intense acting and the venturous parts of the story.

The music of this film just seems weird every once in a while, as if taken from some low-budget 70ies movie.

This unvoluntary-spy-movie is exciting, engaging, well performed and looks beautiful. But I feel a bit pummeled to learn that between the real two men that the book was inspired upon there was a one-sided platonic gay fling going on. Why leave that out in a movie made in 2021?

I know it was left out in the novel the movie was based upon, but I don't see why the movie couldn't be more historically accurate in that sense. It would have made the story much more interesting, and it seems to me that it's usefull to show homosexuality is a thing of all eras and societies.