kandy5001
Jan. 2003 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen2
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen256
Bewertung von kandy5001
Rezensionen9
Bewertung von kandy5001
Not bad. This movie is well put together in plot, characters, and pace.
This family, caught in a somewhat dystopian world where sound is taboo for surprising reasons, lives in a "soundless" world (right down to their shoes or lack there of).
Real life wife/husband Emily Blunt and John Krasinski do a terrific job playing the careful parents. The story starts off with excellent use of exposition and pulls you into the story background (and current context) without forcing anything.
The best part about this movie: the atmosphere of the quiet world that it creates. The logical details are quite impressive. I felt like I understood the forced lifestyle.
The bad(?) part about this movie: the ending seemed a bit rushed, but I see lots of ways there could be an even better sequel (if done with the same devotion to detail and logic that this movie does a valiant effort in doing).
Please see it.
This family, caught in a somewhat dystopian world where sound is taboo for surprising reasons, lives in a "soundless" world (right down to their shoes or lack there of).
Real life wife/husband Emily Blunt and John Krasinski do a terrific job playing the careful parents. The story starts off with excellent use of exposition and pulls you into the story background (and current context) without forcing anything.
The best part about this movie: the atmosphere of the quiet world that it creates. The logical details are quite impressive. I felt like I understood the forced lifestyle.
The bad(?) part about this movie: the ending seemed a bit rushed, but I see lots of ways there could be an even better sequel (if done with the same devotion to detail and logic that this movie does a valiant effort in doing).
Please see it.
It's amazing how, even though you love a character all you life, you refuse accept just ANYTHING given to you as media interpretation. That's how I feel about his movie: amazingly disappointing car that just can't get started...
I never was that fond of how they handled Superman since Reeve's 80's movies blew out in Superman III and IV after the superb Superman and (especially) Superman II. Superman Returns was rather boring, but I liked it (go figure)...while Man of Steel was trying to be like the Marvel superhero movies. Too much gloss, but not enough story to keep up with Iron Man or The Avengers...because Supes is not that kind of character.
I thought the actors were fine as their characters, but where was the story? There are sooooo many Batman/Superman comic book stories that the writers could have used for inspiration...or just plain adapted verbatim. I still am not sure why Batman and Superman needed to be adversaries in this movie. It was strange.
I...guess...that this is just a precursor to the REAL movie: The Justice League movie in which the true nature of Superman and the new Batman will be fleshed out. As it stands, though, as much as I am a "DC, Not Marvel" Fan....they have a long way to go with these iconic, franchise characters compared to what movie makers have done with Iron Man and Cap and Spidey (two times actually).
If you don't see this movie, you're not losing out. Try the older Superman movies with Reeves, Batman from the '60's, Keaton's Batman movies form the 80's (especially the first two), and, of course, Bale's AFI bound versions of the 2000s.
I never was that fond of how they handled Superman since Reeve's 80's movies blew out in Superman III and IV after the superb Superman and (especially) Superman II. Superman Returns was rather boring, but I liked it (go figure)...while Man of Steel was trying to be like the Marvel superhero movies. Too much gloss, but not enough story to keep up with Iron Man or The Avengers...because Supes is not that kind of character.
I thought the actors were fine as their characters, but where was the story? There are sooooo many Batman/Superman comic book stories that the writers could have used for inspiration...or just plain adapted verbatim. I still am not sure why Batman and Superman needed to be adversaries in this movie. It was strange.
I...guess...that this is just a precursor to the REAL movie: The Justice League movie in which the true nature of Superman and the new Batman will be fleshed out. As it stands, though, as much as I am a "DC, Not Marvel" Fan....they have a long way to go with these iconic, franchise characters compared to what movie makers have done with Iron Man and Cap and Spidey (two times actually).
If you don't see this movie, you're not losing out. Try the older Superman movies with Reeves, Batman from the '60's, Keaton's Batman movies form the 80's (especially the first two), and, of course, Bale's AFI bound versions of the 2000s.