edula
Juni 2009 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen6
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Rezensionen7
Bewertung von edula
I've been a bit vocal in my urging for people to go and watch this film, purely as I feel that someone with the balls to make a movie for under a grand deserves to have their film noticed. Still, though, after finally getting to see it, I think that it could have been much more. Instead, could someone please explain to me how something so recent can feel like it has aged so terribly?
It felt dated like a late 80's TV play that may once have had something, but the years have worn away at its impact. A real shame, as with a little more care and attention, there could have been so much more power. Whilst I have nothing but admiration for McMahon's punk rock take on the "let's do the show right here" ethos, I just wish that the final result had been as powerful as his post-festival-screening campaign to divide the viewers and rile the critics.
The script had some wonderful moments, admittedly, but for my tastes came over a little stagy in places. However, despite this, Emmett Scanlan's delivery and performance were very deserving of all the accolades that have since come his way. Terry McMahon definitely has a way with actors, and gets the best out of his cast. Unfortunately his direction appears to be more towards what the cast do, and less to what we actually see in the frame. In the hands of another director, there may have been a different outcome - dialogue-heavy scripts are not always stagy, and can often provide an electric energy when combined with intense visuals (just look at the early films of Andrzej Zulawski for great examples of this). Perhaps it was due to budgetary constraints after all, but then again wasn't that one of 'Charlie Casanova's big selling points? Did adopting the punk ethic unwittingly sap it of all its punk energy?.
Maybe if the funding had come Terry's way before shooting, then this film might have delivered tenfold, with a little more time and a little more care. I've no doubt whatsoever that Terry McMahon is a great writer, and has a gift for directing actors. I'm sure that one day he will also be able to add great filmmaker to that list, and will one day make a film that delivers on all its promises. It's just a shame that this wasn't it. It could have been, and I really wish it had been...
It felt dated like a late 80's TV play that may once have had something, but the years have worn away at its impact. A real shame, as with a little more care and attention, there could have been so much more power. Whilst I have nothing but admiration for McMahon's punk rock take on the "let's do the show right here" ethos, I just wish that the final result had been as powerful as his post-festival-screening campaign to divide the viewers and rile the critics.
The script had some wonderful moments, admittedly, but for my tastes came over a little stagy in places. However, despite this, Emmett Scanlan's delivery and performance were very deserving of all the accolades that have since come his way. Terry McMahon definitely has a way with actors, and gets the best out of his cast. Unfortunately his direction appears to be more towards what the cast do, and less to what we actually see in the frame. In the hands of another director, there may have been a different outcome - dialogue-heavy scripts are not always stagy, and can often provide an electric energy when combined with intense visuals (just look at the early films of Andrzej Zulawski for great examples of this). Perhaps it was due to budgetary constraints after all, but then again wasn't that one of 'Charlie Casanova's big selling points? Did adopting the punk ethic unwittingly sap it of all its punk energy?.
Maybe if the funding had come Terry's way before shooting, then this film might have delivered tenfold, with a little more time and a little more care. I've no doubt whatsoever that Terry McMahon is a great writer, and has a gift for directing actors. I'm sure that one day he will also be able to add great filmmaker to that list, and will one day make a film that delivers on all its promises. It's just a shame that this wasn't it. It could have been, and I really wish it had been...
I must admit that I was looking forward to watching 'This Must Be The Place' as one of the highlights of the current crop of Irish funded (or part-funded) feature films. The quality of films either shot by International directors in Ireland, or by Irish directors themselves, has risen so much over the last few years (such as Urszula Antonia's 'Nothing Personal', and Terry McMahon's 'Charlie Casanova') that it is fast becoming a hotbed of great up-and-coming productions. Looking at the names appearing in 'This Must Be The Place', you would automatically assume that this was going to be yet another fantastic film. Well, assumptions are not always correct...
Whilst I cannot deny that this film is beautifully shot, this is where my positive points end. I would compare watching this film to watching a well photographed feature length music video for a song that has no redeeming features. I usually enjoy slow-paced films (the aforementioned 'Nothing Personal' is by no means a rattling roller-coaster), but the pace here was so leaden that it was impossible to become emotionally connected with any of the characters because none of them could hold your interest for such a drawn-out length of time. The performances from the high-profile cast suggested 'autopilot'. Altogether, it was a bit of a chore to sit through. Not recommended.
Whilst I cannot deny that this film is beautifully shot, this is where my positive points end. I would compare watching this film to watching a well photographed feature length music video for a song that has no redeeming features. I usually enjoy slow-paced films (the aforementioned 'Nothing Personal' is by no means a rattling roller-coaster), but the pace here was so leaden that it was impossible to become emotionally connected with any of the characters because none of them could hold your interest for such a drawn-out length of time. The performances from the high-profile cast suggested 'autopilot'. Altogether, it was a bit of a chore to sit through. Not recommended.
Kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen
7 Gesamtzahl der durchgeführten Umfragen