mohan59
Apr. 2008 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen3
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Rezensionen29
Bewertung von mohan59
Pixar has cultivated a strong reputation amongst adult filmgoers, discerning critics and young audiences for seamlessly blending captivating stories with astonishing visuals. As a member of the first group who originally started in the third, I have never felt let down by Pixar, barring one exception (The Good Dinosaur). Now, sadly, there is one more to that list.
The premise is bold: to tell the origins behind what made this Andy Davis' favorite toy in 1995. With sensibilities and technology having advanced far since then, I'd thought Pixar had more resources (and not less) to paint a canvas that is not only richly rewarding but also pays generous homage to an iconic franchise. With the added element of space adventure, the science fiction angle offers excitement and terror of the unknown in equal measure. Unfortunately, all of these ingredients are not used well at all and the dish falls flat.
The screenplay is the biggest disappointment. It starts on a confident note, suitably establishing the atmosphere but by the third act, it whimpers and staggers, leaving the parallel timelines ushering more questions than answers. The normally super-reliable Michael Giacchino also underperforms, the score nowhere near memorable an iconic character truly deserves. I also felt the tell-tale signs of studio executive interference in some scenes that Pixar usually hits out of the park.
On the positive side, Chris Evans and Taika Waititi are standout performers. The visuals are gorgeous and rich in colors. But that's about it.
Very disappointed 4/10.
The premise is bold: to tell the origins behind what made this Andy Davis' favorite toy in 1995. With sensibilities and technology having advanced far since then, I'd thought Pixar had more resources (and not less) to paint a canvas that is not only richly rewarding but also pays generous homage to an iconic franchise. With the added element of space adventure, the science fiction angle offers excitement and terror of the unknown in equal measure. Unfortunately, all of these ingredients are not used well at all and the dish falls flat.
The screenplay is the biggest disappointment. It starts on a confident note, suitably establishing the atmosphere but by the third act, it whimpers and staggers, leaving the parallel timelines ushering more questions than answers. The normally super-reliable Michael Giacchino also underperforms, the score nowhere near memorable an iconic character truly deserves. I also felt the tell-tale signs of studio executive interference in some scenes that Pixar usually hits out of the park.
On the positive side, Chris Evans and Taika Waititi are standout performers. The visuals are gorgeous and rich in colors. But that's about it.
Very disappointed 4/10.
Inside Job is well-written, full of clever plot devices that take delightful aim at pop culture trends and contemporary affairs. The characters are quite colorful and serve the overall premise with aplomb. The voice cast is also superb, with Christian Slater being an inspiring selection. The humor is what makes this show so refreshing - the jokes are frenetic and range from slapstick to splendid.
Will be looking forward to season 2.
Will be looking forward to season 2.
Kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen
7 Gesamtzahl der durchgeführten Umfragen