roumen-ad

No, not the story in the film, there is no any story there at all. What makes me sad is all that hype about it, more than 20 years later. Today there are 1.2M people given more than 8.2 stars to this pathetic piece of ... whatever. I understand that there are many which just know, this is the best film ever, just because some authority tell them. Do you think I feel lucky? That makes me really really sad. Well, whatever, I have to gave it some credits, though. This is maybe the solely film I found unwatchable in the first 10 minutes, I switched it off. 20 years later I saw it, full length, and that didn't change my mind. I give it 2 stars, though, because I wanted to reserve the 1 for vol. 2, which is even worse (I couldn't wait till it very end, it was a torture). If there was negative notes, I just put them both about minus 10, without hesitate, because I gave 1 star much better films, of the Asylum productions, for example. They are stupid, but hilarious and Lott of fun to watch. Just to be sure, I what to state, that I am not fan of Quentin Tarantino, despite I find some her stuff still watchable.

Well, first of all, I am not Tarantino aficionado, not at all, but that, hm, movie?, move me down under. I don't even remember if I saw the end. And I have jumped back and forward to see if it does better, or to try to understand what is that all about and who is named hm, Blue, Pink etc. Plus noch Blondy; who is who was difficult to separate from the big ball of mud. Easy forgetable, except one, forget about Tarantino. The monologues was lame, dead boring and mindfree. Classic? Well, just 32 years later it seems completly obsolete. Rating? Everything over 3/10 is a shame for the person who give it. Hey, we are not YMCA!