rosco29
Mai 1999 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen5
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen15
Bewertung von rosco29
Rezensionen12
Bewertung von rosco29
This is a documentary mainly aimed at the casual fan, and trying to condense 75 years into three hours is always going leave holes. Let's start with the good stuff.
Liev Schreiber is a great host and narrator. He sets the tone well. Not all actors are good narrators, but Schreiber delivers.
The interviews are an excellent cross-section of folks from across the years. In this time where superheroes dominate the culture, it's eye-opening to remember the humble beginnings.
The odd stuff: For a film that seems to want to be an overview for the masses, it does dive deep into the weeds at times, notably with an extended focus on 1986, and the one-two punch of Dark Knight and Watchmen. Yes, those are two utterly pivotal books, but I'm not sure they require as much screen time as they were given. This also leads to one of the omissions: We should at least have a passing mention of Camelot 3000, the 1982-1985 DC maxi series that paved the way for the direct market. Since the documentary spends time talking about the collecting bubble of the '90s, it's surprising to leave out this book.
The omissions: In addition to ignoring the direct market, there is no mention made of the black-and-white indie explosion of the '80s. I think there is one brief glimpse of an Eastman/Laird TMNT cover. Not a mention of Dark Horse comics. In fact, the only modern company mentioned outside of DC and Marvel is Image.
While some mention is made of Black Panther and Luke Cage in the 70s, not mentioning Milestone seems odd. After all, Static Shock brought that universe into the mainstream, and that's kind of the point of the series: comics gone mainstream.
I could go on, but every documentarian has to make choices. Suffice to say this: what's on the screen is superbly done. But there's more to tell. Hey, Ken Burns! I've got an idea for you...
Liev Schreiber is a great host and narrator. He sets the tone well. Not all actors are good narrators, but Schreiber delivers.
The interviews are an excellent cross-section of folks from across the years. In this time where superheroes dominate the culture, it's eye-opening to remember the humble beginnings.
The odd stuff: For a film that seems to want to be an overview for the masses, it does dive deep into the weeds at times, notably with an extended focus on 1986, and the one-two punch of Dark Knight and Watchmen. Yes, those are two utterly pivotal books, but I'm not sure they require as much screen time as they were given. This also leads to one of the omissions: We should at least have a passing mention of Camelot 3000, the 1982-1985 DC maxi series that paved the way for the direct market. Since the documentary spends time talking about the collecting bubble of the '90s, it's surprising to leave out this book.
The omissions: In addition to ignoring the direct market, there is no mention made of the black-and-white indie explosion of the '80s. I think there is one brief glimpse of an Eastman/Laird TMNT cover. Not a mention of Dark Horse comics. In fact, the only modern company mentioned outside of DC and Marvel is Image.
While some mention is made of Black Panther and Luke Cage in the 70s, not mentioning Milestone seems odd. After all, Static Shock brought that universe into the mainstream, and that's kind of the point of the series: comics gone mainstream.
I could go on, but every documentarian has to make choices. Suffice to say this: what's on the screen is superbly done. But there's more to tell. Hey, Ken Burns! I've got an idea for you...
What sets this version of "A Christmas Carol" apart from so many others is the sheer believability of Scrooge's transformation. So many times, Scrooge is played as a cartoon character, all miserly and mean, and then POOF, all is well at the end.
With Sim, you see Scrooge as a fully realized character. His descent takes time. Even his seizing of the counting house seems nothing more than an incredibly shrewd business move. Fittingly. his redemption also occurs slowly over time. Even when the final Spirit has left, you can tell he's not quite sure he deserves this second chance. His glee in the "morning after" meeting with Bob Crachit is palpable, particularly as it's mixed with his confusion over his newfound state of grace.
Grace. That's at the heart of this tale. Another reviewer tried to paint this as "socialist propaganda." Completely off-mark. Nowhere is it said in the movie that Government should help out. The appeal is to the individual. That's not a governmental appeal. That's a suggestion from a Higher Authority.
Watch the original B&W. It's gorgeous. Every year I revel in watching Alastair Sim rescue Scrooge from all the bad versions out there, and restore him to his place as one of our classic characters.
With Sim, you see Scrooge as a fully realized character. His descent takes time. Even his seizing of the counting house seems nothing more than an incredibly shrewd business move. Fittingly. his redemption also occurs slowly over time. Even when the final Spirit has left, you can tell he's not quite sure he deserves this second chance. His glee in the "morning after" meeting with Bob Crachit is palpable, particularly as it's mixed with his confusion over his newfound state of grace.
Grace. That's at the heart of this tale. Another reviewer tried to paint this as "socialist propaganda." Completely off-mark. Nowhere is it said in the movie that Government should help out. The appeal is to the individual. That's not a governmental appeal. That's a suggestion from a Higher Authority.
Watch the original B&W. It's gorgeous. Every year I revel in watching Alastair Sim rescue Scrooge from all the bad versions out there, and restore him to his place as one of our classic characters.