feverdeang
Nov. 2000 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen2
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Rezensionen9
Bewertung von feverdeang
Why aren't there more comments and viewers for this disturbing little gem? The best conspiracy movie(JFK, PI or otherwise) in may a year hits all the right notes technically and plot wise. Filmmed digitally (SONY PD-150) with such skill that you'll be checking your TV/DVD resolution in the first five minutes, the filmmakers use every advantage and disadvatage of the digital format to their benefit. The camera work begins static, rigid local TV news style then slowly takes on a subtle impressionistic style that blurs the line between docudrama and fiction. Viewers not interested in film as a meta-(self referential) text need not apply. After starting with the formal aspects of the JFK mystery, camera angles, do pictures lie, tampered
evidence and conflicting witnesses the film then seems to turn on the viewer so that we are put in the position of one of those unlucky witnesses who were
bribed, intimidated, bullied, framed or killed for seeing just a little too much. The performances are uniformly great, starting with the ballistics man who plays his part so straight I had to mentally check and remind myself this wasn't a
documentary. The ex-wife was brilliant. All the actors were just realistic to the point of surrealism. I'm now babbling, SEE THIS MOVIE
evidence and conflicting witnesses the film then seems to turn on the viewer so that we are put in the position of one of those unlucky witnesses who were
bribed, intimidated, bullied, framed or killed for seeing just a little too much. The performances are uniformly great, starting with the ballistics man who plays his part so straight I had to mentally check and remind myself this wasn't a
documentary. The ex-wife was brilliant. All the actors were just realistic to the point of surrealism. I'm now babbling, SEE THIS MOVIE
Hey... It's not all bad but it's that kind of bad that you shouldn't pay to see, rent or own. It might warrant watching on TV if it's on for free and you don't get too bored. I'm an artist, a filmmaker, comics and literature fan and this movie fails on so many levels it's barely worth looking. The production design, costumes, sets and SPFX are all top notch. Peta Wilson and Stuart Townsend seem to be in another movie; one closer to the comic
book, that allows them to act, show feelings, character development and
subtlety. Sean Connery is wasted and as Executive Producer he should have
fired Norrington and the screen writer as soon as he saw the first week of
daillies. The problem is the script is leaden and is so full of illogical plot holes only very little kids won't notice. Director Norrington is so lost he can't even put together a fight scene with continuity let alone a world spanning quest movie. A final comment on the comic book to screen translation. Why would you throw out a perfectly good, well reviewed, easily adaptable book? With the current
level of SPFX technology combined with the modern movie audience's
increasing level of tolerance for long films, it was possible to do justice to Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neil's brilliant work. Once again Hollywood thinks all the
viewers want is the surface explosions when what makes the classics (Raiders
of the Lost Ark, The Three Musketeers, The Great Escape, Kelly's Heroes) great is the character's individual strength's and weaknesses combining to give the audience something to identify with. This movie's faux father and son symbolism was shallow and insulting to the intelligence.
book, that allows them to act, show feelings, character development and
subtlety. Sean Connery is wasted and as Executive Producer he should have
fired Norrington and the screen writer as soon as he saw the first week of
daillies. The problem is the script is leaden and is so full of illogical plot holes only very little kids won't notice. Director Norrington is so lost he can't even put together a fight scene with continuity let alone a world spanning quest movie. A final comment on the comic book to screen translation. Why would you throw out a perfectly good, well reviewed, easily adaptable book? With the current
level of SPFX technology combined with the modern movie audience's
increasing level of tolerance for long films, it was possible to do justice to Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neil's brilliant work. Once again Hollywood thinks all the
viewers want is the surface explosions when what makes the classics (Raiders
of the Lost Ark, The Three Musketeers, The Great Escape, Kelly's Heroes) great is the character's individual strength's and weaknesses combining to give the audience something to identify with. This movie's faux father and son symbolism was shallow and insulting to the intelligence.
the funniest movie at Sundance 2001 Scotland PA brought the house down. Maura Tierny and James Legross like a modern Morticia and Gomez Adams can't keep their hands off each other or any one in the way of their fast food takeover bid. Done in high seventies style with amazing detail( roach clips, polyester everything, muscle cars and Pabst Blue Ribbon)the film is faithful to Shakespeare and to fans of over the top satire. Toss in Andy Dick as the leader of the witches and you've got a crowd pleasing, gut busting , high-brow comedy.