Keatonics
Mai 2000 ist beigetreten
Willkommen auf neuen Profil
Unsere Aktualisierungen befinden sich noch in der Entwicklung. Die vorherige Version Profils ist zwar nicht mehr zugänglich, aber wir arbeiten aktiv an Verbesserungen und einige der fehlenden Funktionen werden bald wieder verfügbar sein! Bleibe dran, bis sie wieder verfügbar sind. In der Zwischenzeit ist Bewertungsanalyse weiterhin in unseren iOS- und Android-Apps verfügbar, die auf deiner Profilseite findest. Damit deine Bewertungsverteilung nach Jahr und Genre angezeigt wird, beziehe dich bitte auf unsere neue Hilfeleitfaden.
Abzeichen8
Wie du dir Kennzeichnungen verdienen kannst, erfährst du unter Hilfeseite für Kennzeichnungen.
Bewertungen5305
Bewertung von Keatonics
Rezensionen30
Bewertung von Keatonics
A: You try to remake it.
Take a masterpiece from the master of suspense and the king of storytelling and mash it up by making the leads a pair of ridiculous, badly comedic, bumbling bumbkins. Next, you rewrite the story to include things that the original never talked about and never intended. Then you give it a beautiful score that takes the mystery out of the film, and add a poorly written script that butchers the original dialogue.
And lastly, for those of you who are Hitchcock fans will understand, you take his "Maguffin," the plot point that is never revealed and is irrelevant, and is used only to drive the story and characters, and then you expose it as though it has importance, which it never does.
If you are not a Hitch, you might love it. I am, and I do not.
Take a masterpiece from the master of suspense and the king of storytelling and mash it up by making the leads a pair of ridiculous, badly comedic, bumbling bumbkins. Next, you rewrite the story to include things that the original never talked about and never intended. Then you give it a beautiful score that takes the mystery out of the film, and add a poorly written script that butchers the original dialogue.
And lastly, for those of you who are Hitchcock fans will understand, you take his "Maguffin," the plot point that is never revealed and is irrelevant, and is used only to drive the story and characters, and then you expose it as though it has importance, which it never does.
If you are not a Hitch, you might love it. I am, and I do not.
Film is first and foremost a story-telling medium. Film is at its best when it has straight forward story, strong characters, a linear plot that is easy to follow, and a theme you don't have to search for. If this had any of these, it went over my head.
When people go into an art gallery, there are those who look at the art on the walls and ponder, and (with honest sincerity, or the need to show pretentious artistic knowledge) say, "Hmmm, very deep. It truly moves me." Then there are those who look at it, with head askew, and say "Huh?" I am the latter. I don't know, maybe I am just a landscape and flowers kind of guy. I could never pretend that I understood and liked wine, either. I am more of a coffee guy, with just a little cream and sugar to take the bitter out.
This film seemed slow, drawn out, plodding, and all over the place with unintroduced characters, a story that roamed, and a theme that never penetrated for me. The beautiful cinematography simply could not make for for what it lacked. I had to strain to hear what little dialog there was, I had to strain to see through the persistent darkness, and I had to strain just to understand what it was about. Maybe it was a cultural thing, but when we strive today for a cross-cultural awareness, I felt left behind.
Film as art for art sake has never interested me. I just wondered what the point was, and that question was never answered...for me.
When people go into an art gallery, there are those who look at the art on the walls and ponder, and (with honest sincerity, or the need to show pretentious artistic knowledge) say, "Hmmm, very deep. It truly moves me." Then there are those who look at it, with head askew, and say "Huh?" I am the latter. I don't know, maybe I am just a landscape and flowers kind of guy. I could never pretend that I understood and liked wine, either. I am more of a coffee guy, with just a little cream and sugar to take the bitter out.
This film seemed slow, drawn out, plodding, and all over the place with unintroduced characters, a story that roamed, and a theme that never penetrated for me. The beautiful cinematography simply could not make for for what it lacked. I had to strain to hear what little dialog there was, I had to strain to see through the persistent darkness, and I had to strain just to understand what it was about. Maybe it was a cultural thing, but when we strive today for a cross-cultural awareness, I felt left behind.
Film as art for art sake has never interested me. I just wondered what the point was, and that question was never answered...for me.
Kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen
58 Gesamtzahl der durchgeführten Umfragen
