2 Bewertungen
- nandakumaran_suriapragas
- 15. Mai 2014
- Permalink
Why would Prithviraj do such a blunt project is beyond my understanding. But I pity each and every person of the crew to have coughed up such a poor show as an example for cinema. They should understand, a film just cannot become great if its shot entirely in London.
The story is pure cliché. A greedy guy falls for two women and then chooses the helpless one because he has ounces of sympathy for her. Height of commonplaceness. The likes of Prathap Pothan, whose speech is as inaudible as a seagull in every single film, or Mukesh don't help the film at all. Then we have Andreah Jeremiah, who is hot, all right, but not a good role to portray; she's wasted. Then there is the main actress who doesn't know what acting is at all. She seemed to be standing and reading her lines all the way.
The screenplay is horrible, with experimental cinematography and useless songs. The sequences lack coherence and with 140 minutes of torture, London bridge fails to convey any point. A pure example of lack of imagination at filmmaking.
BOTTOM LINE: Not recommended!
The story is pure cliché. A greedy guy falls for two women and then chooses the helpless one because he has ounces of sympathy for her. Height of commonplaceness. The likes of Prathap Pothan, whose speech is as inaudible as a seagull in every single film, or Mukesh don't help the film at all. Then we have Andreah Jeremiah, who is hot, all right, but not a good role to portray; she's wasted. Then there is the main actress who doesn't know what acting is at all. She seemed to be standing and reading her lines all the way.
The screenplay is horrible, with experimental cinematography and useless songs. The sequences lack coherence and with 140 minutes of torture, London bridge fails to convey any point. A pure example of lack of imagination at filmmaking.
BOTTOM LINE: Not recommended!