West Side Story

My first thought in hearing about this ... a thought I'm sure was shared by many ... was WHY? Why remake a movie that was done so well the first time. Still, I went to the theater and found a wonderful, well-made movie. I hadn't read anything about the movie before seeing it and I went in wondering if they would update it to present day. They didn't, but I think that might have worked too.

Discussing the movie with my twenty-something son, I brought up the "why remake a nearly perfect film" question and his response was ... for a new generation. People his age were never going to see the 1961 version in the theater and most would never see a 60 year old movie at all. This movie allows a new generation (or two or three) to experience the magic on the big screen. Ultimately, the appeal of the movie lies in the music and the dance ... even more than the story. But the story is still powerful even after there have been so very many Romeo and Juliet adaptations.

A fun movie to see on the big screen.

I was hesitant to go after hearing some negative reviews and stories of disapppointing box office after release.

But he music treatmeant of Bernstein's score, the choreography, the cast, were reallyjust excellent. Tony and Maria have more chemistry and talent than the originals (movie version), and I was blown away by the "I Want to Be in America" street scene. Not woke, not lame. See it.

I'm not a huge fan of remakes, but this was a welcomed and really well executed exception.

The amazingly talented and vibrant cast brought new life and vigor to the story while still paying homage to the original.

Musical fan or not, this is a wonderfully represented piece of historical New York and Puerto Rican art and culture.

I highly recommend this film.

Living up to the highly praised 1961 movie musical of the same name, you'd think it would be hard for a reimagining to capture the same type of amazement that the original West Side Story movie had. But the 2021 version of this film is just as amazing as the original! Having director Steven Spielberg doing what he does best, you know you're in for a treat!

This one had a very talented cast as well from Ansel Elgort, Rachel Zegler, Mike Faist to name a few, and of course Rita Moreno herself! This version wasn't afraid to explore the inner workings of these characters. Which made for a very captivating experience.

Although it's not without it faults, the pacing felt a little strange in a few places. But it wasn't super noticeable as the story continued.

A benefit that this version has over the now 60-year-old original, there's more cultural awareness for the Puerto Rican characters that don't feel caricatures of what Hollywood believes all Puerto Ricans should appear. The use of Spanish dialogue allowed for a more authentic view into the lives of those characters when they weren't surrounded by members of the Jet's gang. Since this movie has been made well after the days of the strict guidelines of the Hays production code that took over Hollywood films from the 1930's to the late 60's, it allowed for this version to take more creative freedom and allow swearing, address racial issues, portray harsher violence, and display an emotionally darker tone that the 1961 version was unable to explore.

If you're "on the fence" about seeing this in theatres and waiting until it comes out on home video or streaming services, I suggested you should see it in theatres. This will give the most spectacular experience possible!

It's not a remake. This has absolutely nothing to do with the 1961 film. They are completely separate adaptations of the stage musical. This is not rocket science. New versions of West Side Story are made every year around the world. The 1961 film has literally zero ownership over this story and characters.

It's as simple as this.. anyone crying about this film being "woke" - has not seen it. The extremely short passages of Spanish dialogue are deliberately written to not need subtitles. The performances make the context of the speech obvious - and everything is repeated in English anyway. Anybodys is presented exactly the same as the 1961 film - no reference to "non-binary" is ever made. Ergo the people moaning about the casting have (again) not even seen the film. Nothing about the main plot is changed, but the backstory is developed with great success. Chino especially is a huge improvement from earlier adaptions. Tony's more genuine past is a big asset to the film as well. Rita Moreno's new role is wonderful.

It's an incredible ensemble performance. The dancing is amazing, and the singing is breath-taking. And there's no miming here - many of the songs were even recorded live on set! The work behind the camera is equally impressive. Stunning cinematography and direction. Tony & Maria didn't have perfect chemistry, but the rest of the performance more than makes up for that.

Why are people acting invested in how much money this film makes, as if that has anything to do with it's quality. For a reality check I will remind you Steven Spielberg is literally the richest film director is the history of cinema. The guy is a multi-billionaire. Some people make a success of their lives while internet trolls waste away. Make better choices. And I realise I'm shouting into the void here - this page has clearly been completely lost to those trolls. Or should just say "troll" - on the first page alone I count 6 users that are all literally the same person. That's the extent of my patience, but no doubt this bizarre person has dozens more fake accounts if I could be bothered to check. Why someone would waste their life trolling a film website 24/7 is beyond me - but whatever, it's a free country.