Saul: The Journey to Damascus

The motif is its profound honesty. the courage to be more than a religious film in the frame of pietism but one about discover of truth, fear and faith. its realism is one of great good points. the decent performances, the smart script, the accuracy, the costumes and dialogues are more than interesting but parts of proposition to build a Biblical film not only for a precise target. Saul of Kyle Schmid is a nice surprise. and the force of image and story are the solid pillars of this real special film about the change of world.

So much accuracy traded for dramatic effect when it is not necessary. The story has its own drama without having to resort to fictionalization.

How can you even hear the voices with all the stupid music playing all the time? I wanted to watch this but would have to on subtitles due to the stupid music.

This is the closest I have seen in a movie to the story of Paul and Stephen. I would say the production was B rated, but the acting was surprisingly good. The story followed scripture fairly well and presents a good representation of Paul and also our Jesus.

Saul, becoming Paul as the believer, is well presented in this movie. I would recommend it for any believer. As stated this is the closest I have seen, but I am sure there could be better. But, thankfully we have this movie.

Some of the cast to me were a little unbelievable. For example Mary of Magdelene was Spanish, that is not accurate. Others were very European, still not right. But they did act well and the story was well told.

Don't waste your time unless you want to watch a fantasy. I don't know where they came up with this stuff! The only true parts were that the priests liked Saul, but they didn't like Paul. And Saul was afflicted on the road to Damascus. It would have been so easy to make this true to life. All they had to do was open the Bible. But I'd venture to say they're few and far between in Hollywood.