The Park Maniac

The Park Maniac of 2024 on Prime Amazon. The story revolves around a person who works for a food/parcel courier company. He is a champion of scates and achieve his targets set by his boss much in advance of the rest of the staff. He has a mental craze for young girls. He lures these girls under some pretext takes them to woods rapes and kill them.

There is a young girl working for a news paper, follows these murders closely and manages to find out the delivery man. She gives a name of The Park Maniac, to this man and prints a write up with pictures in the news papers. This Maniac reads about his article and destroys all his belongings runs away to Argentina. But while attacking a lady, the police comes and catches him. The film is good till here. Thereafter the pace slows down and the film becomes boring.

"The Park Maniac" hit streaming with a promise of historical redress, aiming to build a narrative centered on the impacted people and their perspectives, leaving the criminal in the background. But this noble intent doesn't really come through in the end. Instead, the film slips into a contradiction: despite the director's repeated claims in interviews that the focus would be on survivors' and families' stories, the film is drawn to explore Francisco's dark charisma, the killer. This promise of redress falls flat; the title and promotions highlight the criminal, creating expectations that are undermined on screen, where the focus frequently shifts back to the actions of the maniac, who's being tracked by a fictional journalist-the real protagonist-rather than on the aftermath for his victims. As a result, what could have been a tribute to the memory of the murdered women instead turns into a film that wavers between respect and exploitation.

Maurício Eça attempts a critique of sensationalist journalism through the young reporter Elena (Giovanna Grigio), who would theoretically bring a female perspective on the tragedy. But Elena's character is weak: she's little more than a caricature of 90s journalism, capturing only superficial, stereotyped aspects. Instead of a well-rounded character who could guide us through a newsroom filled with ethical conflicts, she's portrayed as the "ideal journalist," facing a toxic environment in a predictable, almost didactic way. This setting, dominated by grotesque male figures, ends up as a distorted mirror of a real issue but represented in such a limited way that it borders on cartoonish. The film clearly wants to take a stand against toxic journalism, but by creating shallow and predictable characters, it ends up diluting any impactful critique of media sensationalism or sexism.

This didactic tone peaks with the introduction of Martha (Mel Lisboa), Elena's sister. As a psychologist, she's reduced to a two-minute monologue explaining "what psychopathy is" in simplistic terms, like a walking encyclopedia just rattling off information. Instead of adding a deeper, human perspective, her character feels more like a manual entry, underutilizing a talented actress and missing the chance to delve into the complexities of psychopathy. The script opts for the cliché that equates mental disorders with crime, perpetuating stereotypes and limiting the discussion on the roots of violence-an essential topic in true-crime productions.

The violent scenes, a controversial aspect since the film's release, reflect this project's moral ambiguity. Rather than restricting violence to what's essential for the story, the director chooses explicit scenes that leave the audience uncomfortable. These moments are reminiscent of the media spectacle the film claims to criticize, bringing to the screen the same sensationalized image that has already scarred viewers who follow such cases. Even though rape scenes are omitted, the way violence is depicted suggests that "realism" must be shocking and graphic. This choice, however, places the film on delicate ethical ground, especially considering it deals with a real and recent case in collective memory. Instead of sensitizing viewers to the impact of the crimes, the film reduces victims to harsh and insensitive images, leaving audiences to question the necessity of these scenes.

Despite the focus on victims in the marketing, the narrative often shifts back to the criminal himself. Silvero Pereira, who plays Francisco, is, in fact, the only actor able to bring out the nuances of his character. His performance captures a man torn between an apparent normalcy-the everyday delivery guy-and the predatory nature of the killer. He navigates these two sides with notable skill, highlighting the paradox between the ordinary and the monstrous. Meanwhile, Giovanna Grigio's portrayal of Elena has moments of intensity, especially in scenes where she confronts her newsroom's toxic environment, reflecting the charged, sensationalist world of journalism. But her talent is limited by a shallow character arc that doesn't allow her to fully explore her emotional layers or inner struggles in a satisfying way.

It's clear that "The Park Maniac" drew inspiration from works like "Silence of the Lambs," which explores the psychological and emotional impact of an investigation on those involved. But unlike Jonathan Demme's film, Elena's journey here is riddled with easy solutions and predictable outcomes, resulting in a shallow narrative. Her ethical dilemmas and challenges lack depth and are resolved without much effort, diminishing the strength of her supposed "victory." The climax, where Elena leaves the newsroom in a supposedly triumphant exit, feels artificial. Though visually designed to be memorable, it comes off as a flashy but empty gesture, more focused on aesthetics than on genuinely resonating with the audience, draining the scene of any impact it might have had.

In the end, "The Park Maniac" gets stuck in uncomfortable ambiguity, unsure whether it wants to critique sensationalism or perpetuate it. By trying to give equal weight to both the criminal and the protagonist, the film loses its initial purpose of honoring the victims, delivering a narrative that seems uncertain about its own morality. What could have been a respectful homage ends up becoming just another chapter in the morbid spectacle it tries to denounce.

Terrible script, actress Giovana Grigio does not convince with her forced performance. The story is not real and still treats the viewer as an idiot. Once the maniac is arrested, he asks her for an interview, and she goes there so he can confess to the crimes. That's ridiculous, that doesn't happen. The script and actors act by "imitating" Americans in police series. But in Brazil this doesn't make sense. This one deserves to go in the trash. I feel sorry for the main actor who didn't deserve to be in a film like this. Because he is a good actor. Silverio Pereira should receive extra money for taking part in a shameful film. I felt treated like an idiot watching an absurdly untrue film. And the police and investigators being treated like idiots while the journalist is treated like the investigator of the case.

The Park Maniac is a movie based on the true story of Francisco, a Brazilian serial killer who lived in São Paulo in the 1990s.

As the movie begins, his entire arc quickly becomes secondary to the plot and feels rushed. You don't get to learn his full story or how he began killing. Instead, he has already killed many women, and there is no development of his character.

The spotlight shifts to the story of Elena, a journalist on a quest to discover herself while struggling against machism in the brazilian press and society.

My main criticism is that you never feel connected to her story. If the intention was to highlight the struggles of women during that time, I believe focusing on the victims would have made for a much richer and more compelling story.

The whole film misses the point, and in the end, you feel cheated, expecting a serial killer story but getting something completely different.

I am Brazilian and I totally remember the story back in the end of the 90's about this guy. Famous Brazilian serial killers are rare, we do have some. We also have a sort of them disguised as "congressmen", because what they do is continuously steal, embezzlement, corruption, and that in the end totally take away lives. But that is another story. Back to this movie, it really seems it was rushed all the way. The movie is a flop. The producers added a character that did not exist. A movie has to be a story very well told, this is not. This movie has never captured the horror of the real victims, the family, what was the killer's thinking process. I love going to the movies, even writing about it, this was so amateur it hurts me as a Brazilian movie theater goer. Not really half -a** made. I'd say 1/3-a** made maybe. A real shame these people missed an opportunity to make a great movie despite the category. It looks like a bunch of cinema students, not even senior ones, went out for a happy hour.], and after some drinks, they decided they could join and make a movie. Rating this movie 4 is fair but I am not sure it is not a "3". I understand that budget in Brazil is a challenge, but hey, it looks like they made this movie out boy and girl scouts cookies sales.