Eine Gruppe von Aktivisten überfällt die Jahresversammlung eines Energieunternehmens und nimmt 300 Personen als Geiseln.Eine Gruppe von Aktivisten überfällt die Jahresversammlung eines Energieunternehmens und nimmt 300 Personen als Geiseln.Eine Gruppe von Aktivisten überfällt die Jahresversammlung eines Energieunternehmens und nimmt 300 Personen als Geiseln.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Taz Skylar
- Noah
- (as Taz Skyler)
- …
Sol E. Romero
- Halina
- (as Sol E Romero)
Rebecca Bellavia
- Mother
- (as Rebecca Bellevue)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The plot feels like a recycled version of something that's been done countless times before, with the only twist being a nerdy character carrying a "Thor hammer," as if begging for mercy from the younger audience. There's little to no effort put into character development, so we couldn't care less about the protagonist or any of the characters, for that matter. There's no suspense, no mystery, just a predictably failed attempt at being a pure action film, which also fell flat. It's hard to find anything positive to say, but here's an attempt: the villain and the cop lady somewhat tried to carry the rest of the cast, but their efforts hardly made a difference. Picture quality was good, lol. You can invite a girl over and play this when you are not really interested in watching. This is one of those movies where you wonder why they even bothered making it, and you're relieved it wasn't any longer.
I'm a big fan of Daisey and also Clive Owen and the Director Martin Campbell (Casino Royal) - but this lame rip off script has little character development or arc - and instead it's just another Hollyweird movie that swaps out Bruce Willis for a chick with a gun. Daisey definitely deserves better scripts as this B script is a direct to video with no real substance and the actors cleaned out Hollywood for a nice pay check. Maybe the suits will learn to make original scripts instead of more rip offs. What's next Ramba - the female Stallone warrior.
At least Clive Owen was smart enough to take a fast paycheck and disappear early in the story so go in with super low expectations and just laugh at the preposterous plot but the action is solid if you can stop laughing at how silly the story actually transpires with one dimensional main character and silly eco terror villains from a cracker box. Maybe AI generated script.
Good news is that Michael Stratham ( Mechanic series) or Charlize Theron ( Atomic series) has nothing to worry about from competition from this lame film.
5 stars for the lead actors and director.
At least Clive Owen was smart enough to take a fast paycheck and disappear early in the story so go in with super low expectations and just laugh at the preposterous plot but the action is solid if you can stop laughing at how silly the story actually transpires with one dimensional main character and silly eco terror villains from a cracker box. Maybe AI generated script.
Good news is that Michael Stratham ( Mechanic series) or Charlize Theron ( Atomic series) has nothing to worry about from competition from this lame film.
5 stars for the lead actors and director.
Corporate greed, eco-activism, terrorism, and a window-cleaner ex-military girl taking down the bad guys who seized her building.
I'll be brief.
This movie is neither particularly fun nor satisfying. The premise shows promise but reveals its hand too early and quickly loses steam. The action is serviceable, the villains are a yawn, and the characters, their motivations, dialogue, and their resolution are all too generic to leave a lasting impression. On top of that, the pacing drags in places, the ending fails to deliver, and the emotional beats between the siblings never quite land. Does it attempt to make a statement about environmental destruction and corporate accountability? If so, it does so in the dullest way possible.
Die Hard, this is not, so the comparisons are moot. Here, the villains hold all the cards (they control the police, the building, and the hostages) and yet the heroine somehow becomes an inexplicable problem for them. There's a script issue, but also an execution problem, as Miss Ridley is competent in the role, but her casual attitude while committing "action" feels jarring and undermines any sense of real danger.
At least it is short (90 minutes, and it feels even shorter). Watch if you want a generic action movie.
I'll be brief.
This movie is neither particularly fun nor satisfying. The premise shows promise but reveals its hand too early and quickly loses steam. The action is serviceable, the villains are a yawn, and the characters, their motivations, dialogue, and their resolution are all too generic to leave a lasting impression. On top of that, the pacing drags in places, the ending fails to deliver, and the emotional beats between the siblings never quite land. Does it attempt to make a statement about environmental destruction and corporate accountability? If so, it does so in the dullest way possible.
Die Hard, this is not, so the comparisons are moot. Here, the villains hold all the cards (they control the police, the building, and the hostages) and yet the heroine somehow becomes an inexplicable problem for them. There's a script issue, but also an execution problem, as Miss Ridley is competent in the role, but her casual attitude while committing "action" feels jarring and undermines any sense of real danger.
At least it is short (90 minutes, and it feels even shorter). Watch if you want a generic action movie.
While I had indeed not heard about the 2025 action thriller "Cleaner", when I stumbled upon it by random chance, of course I had to check it out. Especially since the movie had Clive Owen on the cast list.
The storyline in the movie was adequate. Sure, it was a watchable action thriller, but I have to say that I was left with an overwhelming sensation of having just watched a 2025 take on the 1988 movie "Die Hard". It was a bit odd that writers Simon Uttley, Paul Andrew Williams and Matthew Orton collectively couldn't muster more than a remake of the 1988 "Die Hard" movie. But hey, "Cleaner" was a watchable movie, nonetheless.
I was only familiar with leading actress Daisy Ridley and Clive Owen on the cast list. And it was a shame that Clive Owen wasn't given a bigger part to play in the movie, because he could definitely have spruced up the movie quite a bit.
There is a fair amount of action throughout the course of the movie, and it looks good. And I will say that it definitely helped to lift up the movie.
"Cleaner" is a movie worth checking out if you enjoyed the 1988 movie "Die Hard". But this time it is with a female lead.
My rating of director Martin Campbell's 2025 action thriller "Cleaner" lands on a six out of ten stars.
The storyline in the movie was adequate. Sure, it was a watchable action thriller, but I have to say that I was left with an overwhelming sensation of having just watched a 2025 take on the 1988 movie "Die Hard". It was a bit odd that writers Simon Uttley, Paul Andrew Williams and Matthew Orton collectively couldn't muster more than a remake of the 1988 "Die Hard" movie. But hey, "Cleaner" was a watchable movie, nonetheless.
I was only familiar with leading actress Daisy Ridley and Clive Owen on the cast list. And it was a shame that Clive Owen wasn't given a bigger part to play in the movie, because he could definitely have spruced up the movie quite a bit.
There is a fair amount of action throughout the course of the movie, and it looks good. And I will say that it definitely helped to lift up the movie.
"Cleaner" is a movie worth checking out if you enjoyed the 1988 movie "Die Hard". But this time it is with a female lead.
My rating of director Martin Campbell's 2025 action thriller "Cleaner" lands on a six out of ten stars.
TL;DR, not great but okay, but man do some things get to me.
Look I've seen my fair share of bad action films, believe me I'm a sucker for poorly written films.
This movie isn't good narrativly, I'll say that, but it atleast managed to do some things right that made it a step above other bad action films. It tried to take time to build its characters, it wasn't incredibly one-note, and it didn't just jump straight into the action/fights but took the time to build toward it.
The one thing that really gets me is the final confrontation. It doesn't feel like one at all. Just a quick little fight, and boom, the movie ends. Also, not really a fan of the depiction of Autism in the film. It kind of plays into the stereotype that people with Autism are just infantile.
Overall, not great but okay, but man do some things get to me.
Look I've seen my fair share of bad action films, believe me I'm a sucker for poorly written films.
This movie isn't good narrativly, I'll say that, but it atleast managed to do some things right that made it a step above other bad action films. It tried to take time to build its characters, it wasn't incredibly one-note, and it didn't just jump straight into the action/fights but took the time to build toward it.
The one thing that really gets me is the final confrontation. It doesn't feel like one at all. Just a quick little fight, and boom, the movie ends. Also, not really a fan of the depiction of Autism in the film. It kind of plays into the stereotype that people with Autism are just infantile.
Overall, not great but okay, but man do some things get to me.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe hammer Michael (Matthew Tuck) carries is the same shape as an asteroid blaster seen in Star Wars: The Last Jedi, which stars Daisy Ridley
- PatzerJoey spends a lot of effort desperately trying to get into the building when she could easily have climbed in the broken window from which Marcus was originally thrown out. As an alternative she later had the option of climbing in the enormous holes made by the explosive that was lowered to the cleaning stage.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Threat: CLEANER | Film Threat Reviews (2025)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Everything New on HBO Max in June
Everything New on HBO Max in June
Looking for something different to add to your Watchlist? Take a peek at what movies and TV shows are coming to HBO Max this month.
- How long is Cleaner?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Клінер
- Drehorte
- Winnersh Film Studios, Vereinigtes Königreich(1020 Eskdale Road Wokingham RG41 5TS)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 25.000.000 £ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 794.091 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 403.560 $
- 23. Feb. 2025
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.314.073 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen