Baby Cat

First you need to find and watch the absolutely worst movie Ed Wood Jr. Ever made. Then imagine a movie three hundred times worse than that and you will have Baby Cat.

It's absolute junk disguised as a movie. It's so bad that about a quarter of it is filmed in front of a green screen with images added to pretend to be the out doors, or other stuff. And people in their basement on youtube do a better job.

The direction is the pits. Some scenes are actually edited to zoom in on the action AFTER they were filmed. It's disorienting and unprofessional.

To be fair, the cat is hot, even if she does the worst cat impersonation on the planet Earth. But hot isnt enough to get over the horrible production "values," the lack of professional direction, the poor script and the lack of acting on a level above 3rd grade.

People who are giving this 10's or even 8's either didnt see the movie, or worked on it. There is no way anyone can give this a good score. It's dismal filmmaking at it's worst.

That would be a better name. Because the final cut of this movie is so bad.

• They (probably the editor) zoomed very noticable in on de material in some shots. That's just not done. Because you lose your quality. As is seen in this movie. The zooming was done so bad, you'd think the editor accidently fell asleep on the keyboard en never noticed what he just did.

• Than the keying. Are there even application that don't have an instand key-effect in the effecten bin. (Drop on clip and select color.)

In one instance they open a door and there is something going in the shot wich could have easely been prevented by a simple mask.

• The most amateurish is the fact that the editor left a flash frame. Around the 17th minute.

• And never use a moving background when you a going to key a shot over that (moving) shot.

So why did I watch the whole thing and why the two stars?

The two main girls. They were great. In their own way.

A woman falls in love with a female who acts and dresses like a cat??!!!

Let's break down how I got to 6 stars:

Special effects - 0 stars. I've never seen worse green screens.

Plot - 2 stars. It actually made more sense (which is saying absolutely nothing) as it went along

Actors - 8 stars. They owned their roles, no matter how outlandish they might be. And it takes a special kind of courage to:

A. Dress and act and "speak" like a cat for an entire movie

B. Pretend to fall in love with a person who dresses, acts, and "speaks" like a cat for an entire movie.

Honestly, I could have stopped 10 minutes in and not think I missed anything. But the longer I watched, the more I appreciated what they we're trying to do.

Also, extra stars for the Lisa London appearance.

If you can look past the worst green screen work I've ever seen, the acting, script, nonsensical dialog , and non-story...you may enjoy this "movie" . There's a hot actress as the "cat" and that's about the only redeeming factor. If its meant to be a softcore porno, it's def not that...its more like a mishmash of scenes that make little to bo sense.

All the bad editing and sfx are soo distracting and if it was done slightly better it would make up for this.

Clearly a production with no real experience or eye for filmmaking...I would avoid this unless your having a "bad movie night" then it may be just right!

Nothing can prepare you for this movie. Nothing.

Your five year old cousin's son could operate a camera with more ability than the operator/s on this film.

The writer/director was either on drugs or undergoing rectal adjustment surgery during the process of writing and making this film.

The acting - I'm just kidding, there's no acting going on here. The cat chick is hot, that's about it.

Watching this film makes me wonder what its real purpose is because it was not made to entertain or engage an audience. It must be some kind of cover up job tax write-off thing.

Incredible. One of a kind. Unprecedented. Use this part of the review on the cover.