Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAs her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I'd like to preface my post by stating this is my first post. I say that not to be like that corny Facebook troll who gets a hard on with having no life, but to let you understand I created an account ONLY to review this movie in the hopes that I save your eyes the massacre that is this movie. Just like the previous user, I was swindled into watching this movie after hearing buzz about M Night Shamalyan's new thriller, and sat through this Snapchat story of a movie confused waiting for a genius plot twist to make sense of this keyboard mashing of a script. The characters are creepy enough that you're waiting for a murder and the writing is so odd you are anticipating some sort of mental hospital twist. I felt like this was a high school project idea as a scheme to make a quick buck in hopes of pulling the old bait and switch. I've watched paint dry with more character development. I urge you to stub your toe repeatedly for an hour and a half, listen to nails on a chalk board for 90 minutes, or even listen to a Donald Trump press conference as all are somehow a more enjoyable use of your time. I wholeheartedly agree with the previous user's comment that the positive reviews on this post must be friends, family, or blackmailed on a golden shower tape because it is preposterous to conceive any human who could type a review could process this soccer dad trying out his new camcorder of an eye f*ck as anything other than cruel and unusual punishment deserves some sort of an investigation.
P.S. John Oliver, if you see this, I'd love an interview #NatesMovieReviews #HireMe
P.S. John Oliver, if you see this, I'd love an interview #NatesMovieReviews #HireMe
I was very surprised when I received this movie, thinking it was a horror/thriller .. And I was presented with a light comedy that at some points had me in stitches with laughter.
The reality of weird nerds obsessed with bowling and movies, to the mixed up emotions of life being single at 30 . Leaves you relating to the movie on multiple levels.
Each of the characters are not only believable with its wonderful acting, but I found myself being able to put friends of my own in each character.
Jamie Buckner left little lacking in this light amusing flick, leaving me thinking "Another Chick Flick I Love .. DARN YOU!!" I gather the reason why most people rated this so low is because there was no high action, blood splatter moments. Just a bunch of friends, getting drunk, and giggling with each other .. what else is needed ?
The reality of weird nerds obsessed with bowling and movies, to the mixed up emotions of life being single at 30 . Leaves you relating to the movie on multiple levels.
Each of the characters are not only believable with its wonderful acting, but I found myself being able to put friends of my own in each character.
Jamie Buckner left little lacking in this light amusing flick, leaving me thinking "Another Chick Flick I Love .. DARN YOU!!" I gather the reason why most people rated this so low is because there was no high action, blood splatter moments. Just a bunch of friends, getting drunk, and giggling with each other .. what else is needed ?
Like many others I thought I was the movie Split as part the unbreakable, split trilogy but after 10 mins I guessed it wasn't gonna be "that" movie.... But I have a thing for watching a random films and watched it to the end and enjoyed it.... Worth a watch for sure especially if you enjoy watching humans being humans
I hate how people are leaving negative reviews because they made the mistake to watch the wrong movie. Its already hard enough for them making a movie with a budget not as big as the Split film some where expecting. This is more of a comedy film than a thriller film. The best of luck to this films producer and actors/actresses. Watch this film if you expect comedy not suspense.
This a great example of a film where everyone working to make tried so very hard to make it that they forgot to keep track of the pages of the script resulting in 1) Enormous plot holes, 2) opened story elements that are never closed or developed, and 3) cappers on story elements that never reached the final cut.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesOne of three movies to be released in 2016 to be titled Split.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 30 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen