Eine antike Prinzessin wird in ihrem Sarkophag unter den Sandmassen der Wüste wieder zum Leben erweckt und bringt im Verlauf der Jahrtausende gewachsene Böswilligkeit und Terror mit sich, de... Alles lesenEine antike Prinzessin wird in ihrem Sarkophag unter den Sandmassen der Wüste wieder zum Leben erweckt und bringt im Verlauf der Jahrtausende gewachsene Böswilligkeit und Terror mit sich, denen die Menschen nicht gewachsen sind.Eine antike Prinzessin wird in ihrem Sarkophag unter den Sandmassen der Wüste wieder zum Leben erweckt und bringt im Verlauf der Jahrtausende gewachsene Böswilligkeit und Terror mit sich, denen die Menschen nicht gewachsen sind.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 Gewinne & 18 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I'm a fan of this "type" of movie, i.e. Indiana Jones, clean cut fun. I liked the '99 Mummy version (Brendan Fraser & Rachel Wiesz) a lot, but this movie is not in the same vein. It is not meant to be campy, but it still light hearted.
I like the stories arch, and how it was told. Though Sofia Boutella, Ahmanet, was actually quite good in her role.
Maybe people we expecting a remake of the '99 version, or maybe people didn't expect this from Cruise. Whatever the reason, count me as someone who wasn't disappointed.
I like the stories arch, and how it was told. Though Sofia Boutella, Ahmanet, was actually quite good in her role.
Maybe people we expecting a remake of the '99 version, or maybe people didn't expect this from Cruise. Whatever the reason, count me as someone who wasn't disappointed.
One of the biggest blockbusters to come out in the summer of 1999 was an Egypt-set action thriller starring Brendan Fraser. While the film was pretty campy and over-the-top, it worked well and resonated with audiences. Fast-forward 18 years and we have a film of the same title - 'The Mummy' - only starring Tom Cruise in the role of Nick Morton, a treasure hunting renegade who stumbles upon a 5,000-year curse.
The only problem is, this film is far inferior to the original. Whether it's Cruise's schtick not jiving with the plot, or the lackluster CGI, or the wooden script, it's hard to say. There's really nothing thrilling about 'Mummy,' as everything feels borrowed, used or broken - nothing is shiny and new. Even fresh faces like Jake Johnson and Sofia Boutella aren't enough to up the excitement factor, and vets like Russell Crowe come off as looking to be in need of a paycheck rather than delivering a performance to be happy with. The action sequences are boring, the "comic relief" is far from funny and the acting itself is nothing to marvel at.
Cruise can usually find a way to make his films at least somewhat entertaining, but he fails here. There is no chemistry between any of the characters, including Nick and his love interest, Jenny Halsey (Annabelle Wallis), so the onus is really on Cruise to shoulder everything. In this case, it's an insurmountable task.
'The Mummy' is a half-hearted attempt to revive a franchise that started strong and has since faded, so it's likely it will be put back in a sarcophagus.
The only problem is, this film is far inferior to the original. Whether it's Cruise's schtick not jiving with the plot, or the lackluster CGI, or the wooden script, it's hard to say. There's really nothing thrilling about 'Mummy,' as everything feels borrowed, used or broken - nothing is shiny and new. Even fresh faces like Jake Johnson and Sofia Boutella aren't enough to up the excitement factor, and vets like Russell Crowe come off as looking to be in need of a paycheck rather than delivering a performance to be happy with. The action sequences are boring, the "comic relief" is far from funny and the acting itself is nothing to marvel at.
Cruise can usually find a way to make his films at least somewhat entertaining, but he fails here. There is no chemistry between any of the characters, including Nick and his love interest, Jenny Halsey (Annabelle Wallis), so the onus is really on Cruise to shoulder everything. In this case, it's an insurmountable task.
'The Mummy' is a half-hearted attempt to revive a franchise that started strong and has since faded, so it's likely it will be put back in a sarcophagus.
Heading out of the theater I was dissapointed to say the least....
Of course Tom Cruise killed it as an actor in this film. But the story is Boring, it doesn't have the same feel as the 1999 and 2001 one and it has a pretty dull ending. Alot of people may enjoy it and I get that but for me it was just a "Whatever" movie. If you want a good movie which entertains you I recommend staying away from this and choosing another Movie. Overall pretty poor start to Universals "Dark Universe".
Of course Tom Cruise killed it as an actor in this film. But the story is Boring, it doesn't have the same feel as the 1999 and 2001 one and it has a pretty dull ending. Alot of people may enjoy it and I get that but for me it was just a "Whatever" movie. If you want a good movie which entertains you I recommend staying away from this and choosing another Movie. Overall pretty poor start to Universals "Dark Universe".
"When this movie came out, there was an awful lot of fuss from people. I honestly don't think it's as bad. This was supposed to be a new trilogy series that Universal was making called the Dark Universe, and they were remaking all the original Universal horror movies-The Mummy, Frankenstein, The Wolfman, and Dracula. I'm honestly more disappointed because of the bad reception this got that they shut that down.
I definitely think Tom Cruise was not exactly the right pick for the leading actor in this movie, though. Not saying he wasn't terrible, but all I could think about was it feeling like a Mission Impossible movie.
The one thing about this movie I would have loved to see more of was Russell Crowe as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; he was fantastic!
To wrap things up, personally, this is nowhere near as good as the Brendan Fraser remake, and everybody knows that, but I certainly don't think this movie deserved all the criticism it got."
I definitely think Tom Cruise was not exactly the right pick for the leading actor in this movie, though. Not saying he wasn't terrible, but all I could think about was it feeling like a Mission Impossible movie.
The one thing about this movie I would have loved to see more of was Russell Crowe as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde; he was fantastic!
To wrap things up, personally, this is nowhere near as good as the Brendan Fraser remake, and everybody knows that, but I certainly don't think this movie deserved all the criticism it got."
It's never good when you have to say "It's not that bad!" but I think the Mummy is being treated to harshly by critics. It has a 15% on Rotten Tomatoes. Really? It's not a great movie, but it is fun to watch and I thought the ending was very good. It felt a bit like a B- Movie in the beginning, but I still enjoyed it.
7 out of 10
7 out of 10
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe zero gravity scene took sixty-four takes and was shot for two days in a special plane that was lined in padded green fabric covered in reference marks The plane would fly to a high altitude then dive along a parabolic path, falling at the same rate as the gravitational pull. This has been used for several films in the past, including Apollo 13 (1995) 22 years earlier. It was invented by NASA, where it was used for zero-G training for astronauts. Reportedly, a lot of the crew got nauseous during the scene and vomited, except for the main stars, Tom Cruise and Annabelle Wallis, who were really proud of the stunt.
- PatzerThe god Set is referred to as the god of death, but in Egyptian mythology Set was the god of chaos and violence while Anubis, who was later replaced by Osiris was the god of death.
- Zitate
Dr. Henry Jekyll: Welcome to a new world of gods and monsters.
- Crazy CreditsAfter the Universal logo appears, the world goes dark and a "Dark Universe" title appears.
- Alternative VersionenThere are three distinct versions available: the worldwide theatrical release, with a runtime of "1h 51m (111 min)", a U.S. theatrical release running "1h 50m (110 min) ", and a special cut for India, with a runtime of "1h 50m (110 min)".
- VerbindungenFeatured in Monster Vision: A History and Analysis of Horror Cinema (2016)
- SoundtracksBang Bang You're Dead
Written by Didz Hammond (as David Hammond), Carl Barât (as Carl Barat), Gary Powell, Anthony Rossomando
Performed by Dirty Pretty Things
Courtesy of Mercury Records Limited
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 125.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 80.227.895 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 31.688.375 $
- 11. Juni 2017
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 409.231.607 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 51 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen