Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA viral video shows a mysterious figure walking along the edge of the woods each day, and filmmaker Bill Howard sets out to spend a night there to find out exactly what it is.A viral video shows a mysterious figure walking along the edge of the woods each day, and filmmaker Bill Howard sets out to spend a night there to find out exactly what it is.A viral video shows a mysterious figure walking along the edge of the woods each day, and filmmaker Bill Howard sets out to spend a night there to find out exactly what it is.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Hurley Paul
- Deputy
- (as Paul Hurley)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This FICTIONAL movie just goes to show that if you've got $50 spare bucks in your pocket, you too can make a lousy movie. Just label it as a "documentary", and you might even get it picked up by a streaming service. Seriously, it's an hour and twenty minutes of your life youll never get back. The script is nonexistent (It's essentially just a poorly made YouTube vlog.). The cinematography is rank amateur quality, with several long sequences filmed completely out of focus and/or grossly overexposed. But the show does have one redeeming quality; the CGI face in the flash during the end sequence is hilarious! It's at around 14:07 from the end of the movie (though it may take a few tries to get a still-frame of it, keep trying!).
Full of contradictory dialog and actions while severely lacking in any interesting actions or events. The event being investigated takes place on the edge of private property, bordering a busy public road just before sunset every day. So the investigator waits 3 weeks (21 sunsets not investigated) to secure permission from the property owners to spend one entire night (long after the event already happened somewhere off camera), deep in the woods (far from the "ghost walker"). WTH? After that stupid setup it doesn't get any better. The "wait for it moment" is the ending. I mean for the entire thing to be over. I give it 1 star above the bottom because he didn't have a wildly swinging camera POV like most mockumentaries. So you will not get motion sickness while being bored.
I like the premise behind this film and the erieness that encompases it. It has a very raw vibe and so with that said you must prepare to spend a good deal of time waiting for things to happen. I enjoyed the fact that the opening took you right into things and we got a glimpse of "something walking in the woods". I secretly wanted to see more of it. I personally feel there are sections that linger a bit much, and some of the performances near the end fell just a tad flat, but that's just me. The camping scenes felt very real to me and when stuff started to unfold, I felt in the moment the most. All in all it was a fun watch with some very creepy and original moments!
The fact that the figure stopped moving and was visibly standing still when it reached the end of its walk. It's particularly visible when he shows the clip that he "ran through " some unnamed software.
When you see the wood's interior, it's really easy to see why the figure was able to move so fluidly. Those woods are very open.
The tent pitching scene is fairly entertaining, being in fast forward.
It's a little, "Blair Witchy", only on a lower budget.
There's even an actor in the credits for the, "figure walking".
It looked fake and I'm calling it as listed incorrectly as, "Documentary".
I mentioned a couple of things in the movie, but I wouldn't call them spoilers.
Bit boring for me.
When you see the wood's interior, it's really easy to see why the figure was able to move so fluidly. Those woods are very open.
The tent pitching scene is fairly entertaining, being in fast forward.
It's a little, "Blair Witchy", only on a lower budget.
There's even an actor in the credits for the, "figure walking".
It looked fake and I'm calling it as listed incorrectly as, "Documentary".
I mentioned a couple of things in the movie, but I wouldn't call them spoilers.
Bit boring for me.
Well, if you've seen it, congrats to you! You either enjoyed it or wondered who you need to talk to about getting that time back for watching it. I am on the fence, so I am not thrilled, but didn't hate it either. It won't watch it a second time, but I won't say I wasted my time because I found it interesting at first. My real gripe is that I was invested in the Figure in the beginning and it did delve further. I have another one at the end, but for the sake of spoiling it, I won't mention it. I'll say, there is some over-acting. The effects were meh, but get an A for effort.
Not much for substance and there are many better mockumentary films out there, but I have seen much much worse mockumentaries. 5/10 maybe C grade movie.
Not much for substance and there are many better mockumentary films out there, but I have seen much much worse mockumentaries. 5/10 maybe C grade movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIn the library scene, Bill Howard starts his research with the book "The Fabulous History of the Dismal Swamp Company." This is a call back to Howard's first feature film, The Great Dismal, which is a story about a series of creature sightings in the Great Dismal Swamp.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Something Walks in the Woods?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 21 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Something Walks in the Woods (2023) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort