George A. Romero's Resident Evil

Missed opportunity from an inexperienced director. Narration seems AI created, talking head interviews have no name Kyron's to identify. Long meandering voiceover scenes, explaining story ideas with game footage, make for an uninteresting experience. Disappointing.

Missed opportunity from an inexperienced director. Narration seems AI created, talking head interviews have no name Kyron's to identify. Long meandering voiceover scenes, explaining story ideas with game footage, make for an uninteresting experience. Disappointing.

Missed opportunity from an inexperienced director. Narration seems AI created, talking head interviews have no name Kyron's to identify. Long meandering voiceover scenes, explaining story ideas with game footage, make for an uninteresting experience. Disappointing.

It was a beautiful humane story of George Romero's stance; his core values outweighs what could've been. A fun directorate role from Brandon Salisbury, takes a re-watchable trip through not only memory lanes but unexplored areas. This is absolutely a much watch. As a fan of the original Biohazard/Resident Evil, it's insanely nice to see something relevant about the movie ideas from that 1996 masterpiece.

For those who don't know, this movie stars Norman England (author of Behind the Kaiju Curtain) and James Rolfe makes a cameo as well. I appreciate the modern day influences taking place on this movie.

The first half of this documentary is mostly setup for the main subject. You get an overview of Romero's career, an overview of the creation of Biohazard/ Resident Evil, and then a segment on where the two intersect with the Biohazard commercial that Romero directed. This half is fine, has some interesting tidbits, but it is long (nearly an hour) and has some tedium as well. It's a little "in 1968 George Romero made Night of the Living Dead, and then he did ___, and then he made ____, and then he went on to make ____. In the 1990's Capcom did ____, and then they did ____." I'm oversimplifying but outside of some interview clips and visuals to go along with the info that's the short of it. The best part was the section on the Biohazard 2 commercial, it had interesting bits on Brad Renfro's contract stipulations and I do think it accomplished showing the viewer how Romero's involvement evolved into Romero working on an RE film proper. It wasn't the most surefooted journey but it got us there.

The second half focused on Romero's scripts and ended with a tribute of sorts to the man. The doc really picked up speed here, maybe a little too much speed. There's someone briskly reading through the main beats of Romero's RE scripts and, while fascinating, it comes at you fast enough to make what you're hearing/reading hard to process and appreciate. I'll have to rewatch this part. I feel like there's a missed opportunity here as well. Throughout the doc you're treated with some pretty decent reenactment type of footage that was shot at a mansion that looks pretty close to the Spencer mansion. There's actors resembling STARS characters and some Zombie makeup as well. When Romero's script is being read off, it would have enhanced the viewing experience greatly to get some representations of what you're hearing other than game footage. Even just one or two moments from the script given a little more time and examination would've deepened the experience greatly.

Overall, I think this is worth checking out if you're a fan of both Romero and the classic RE games. If you're not invested in both of those things, I don't think this documentary has enough generally interesting stories or information to carry you through for 1hr 50min. I've read reviews saying that most of what this doc says is already out there in the public, that doesn't bother me though. This is a very niche subject and there is no way that this is common knowledge for casual fans so it's nice to have it all compiled and given a narrative. It has a cool presentation, and if it is a little tedious or rushed at times I think it basically accomplished what was promised. The director clearly cares about the subject which comes across well enough. I'll give it a 7.

This doccumentary is not only great for George Romero's and Resident Evil's fans, it's also a great incentive for those who haven't seen all of George Romero's films, it revisits Romero's most iconic films like Dawn of the dead and Day of the dead, while giving interesting facts you may not know about the making of his most-known movies and of course, of his canceled adaptation of Resident Evil. The ending makes you reflect on how much impact Romero has in the zombie genre.

It also portrays the audience's reaction during that time toward the constant problems Romero's Resident Evil adaptation had, and how it all led to the badly adapted Resident Evil movie saga we all know.

As a fan of Resident Evil, zombies and Romero, this documentary took me by surprise. I didn't know of its making, so faced with the news it had just been released piqued my curiosity. It proves to be moderately interesting, but diluted by uninspired structure and is ultimately unsure as to what it really is about.

Just to prove my Resident Evil chops, I was well aware of the near mythological tales of what-could-have-been Romero's Resident Evil and even read his script for it back in the day. I'm also in the camp of those who think Paul W. S. Anderson's take on the franchise is an abomination that should never have had any tangent to the Resident Evil universe. This means that I've often ruefully wondered about why Romero wasn't allowed to bring his considerably more faithful version to life.

Brandon Salisbury's take on the matter is a scattered one, diluted with narration and script read outs, but not without moments of charm and intrigue. It definitely tells a story, covering a lot of ground on both the RE franchise and Romero's legacy. After briefly introducing Romero as a creator, it goes on to the origin of the Resident Evil series. For about twenty minutes it then delves into what I thought the main topic would be about, how Romero's Resident Evil came to (not) be, before becoming a full-on ode to Romero himself.

The homage to Romero is the best part of the film and, to its merit, it does also answer the question of why his version of Resident Evil didn't come about.

Part of the reason why the tribute works best, is because of the colour brought by many of the people who were interviewed, obviously touched by Romero not only as an artist, but also as a person. This works well, even if there's very little from Romero himself in this film. It also delves into some interesting curiosities about the latter part of his career and his legacy, which leaves the distinct feeling that a movie focused on Romero would have had more to say.

Like the Resident Evil franchise, this documentary is torn between finding a commercial niche and telling something worth watching and listening to. It's going to be kind of interesting for fans of Resident Evil, but anyone who cares about this particular intersection of history, will probably know most of the things GA Romero's Resident Evil has to say.