IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,8/10
12.391
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Die Geschichte spielt neun Jahre nach einem apokalyptischen Ereignis, das Millionen tötete und die Welt von Geistern bewohnt zurück ließ.Die Geschichte spielt neun Jahre nach einem apokalyptischen Ereignis, das Millionen tötete und die Welt von Geistern bewohnt zurück ließ.Die Geschichte spielt neun Jahre nach einem apokalyptischen Ereignis, das Millionen tötete und die Welt von Geistern bewohnt zurück ließ.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
David Lawrence Brown
- Principal Pescatelli
- (as David Brown)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I really liked underlying premise of this movie, specifically that the millions of people killed by a cataclysmic event became ghosts, or remnants. In addition to this novel concept, the acting was good, and the characters' motivations and actions were logical and intelligent. In fact, I can't think of a single instance where extremely poor decision-making was used to advance the plot, setting this apart from most horror/thriller movies.
On the minus side, there were a number of plot holes and cheesy bits. Although they weren't bad enough to ruin the movie, there were enough of them that I can only give it a 7/10.
Overall, it was an enjoyable movie, and I would recommend it.
On the minus side, there were a number of plot holes and cheesy bits. Although they weren't bad enough to ruin the movie, there were enough of them that I can only give it a 7/10.
Overall, it was an enjoyable movie, and I would recommend it.
Great premise, interesting visuals and good pacing up until the second half.
The story itself is kinda similar to Otherlife (2017), but much more predictable, yet the film feels complete in the end.
I wish it was just a little more emotionally packed and paced more naturally. In its current state, the film feels more lika a long TV show pilot, the ending is a clear evidence of that.
Still an ok watch for sci-fi fans, but nothing mind-blowing.
The story itself is kinda similar to Otherlife (2017), but much more predictable, yet the film feels complete in the end.
I wish it was just a little more emotionally packed and paced more naturally. In its current state, the film feels more lika a long TV show pilot, the ending is a clear evidence of that.
Still an ok watch for sci-fi fans, but nothing mind-blowing.
I watched this at home on DVD from my local library. My wife chose to skip, not her kind of movie.
Bella Thorne is the main character, high schooler Veronica (Ronnie) Calder. Every morning at the breakfast table she witnesses exactly the same thing, her father sitting there, reading a newspaper, smiling and nodding to her, then his image dissolves and disappears. The title is a reference to this.
Some ten years earlier in the Chicago area an incident during experiments with a heavy particle accelerator causes a flash that killed hundreds, including Ronnie's dad, and their images return every day.
But that just sets the story up. The meat of it becomes the search for a person who may be a serial killer, and may be tracking Ronnie so that an "exchange" can be made to bring someone else back from the dead.
It is a pretty interesting take on the ghost theme and I enjoyed watching the movie, although I will not count it among my favorites.
Bella Thorne is the main character, high schooler Veronica (Ronnie) Calder. Every morning at the breakfast table she witnesses exactly the same thing, her father sitting there, reading a newspaper, smiling and nodding to her, then his image dissolves and disappears. The title is a reference to this.
Some ten years earlier in the Chicago area an incident during experiments with a heavy particle accelerator causes a flash that killed hundreds, including Ronnie's dad, and their images return every day.
But that just sets the story up. The meat of it becomes the search for a person who may be a serial killer, and may be tracking Ronnie so that an "exchange" can be made to bring someone else back from the dead.
It is a pretty interesting take on the ghost theme and I enjoyed watching the movie, although I will not count it among my favorites.
I don't agree with the reviews that say that the script tries to pack too much in, I really don't get that criticism. It's fine. The problem that brought this movie down from a 7:00 to 6:00 for me is a disappointingly common plot development toward the end, such a cliche that it pulls the movie down from good to just fair. I haven't read the novel it's based on but I suspect the same thing happens there. If that's correct you can't blame the script for following the novel.
My own rule of thumb is that a 6 is a decently entertaining movie and a 7 is worth watching more than once. I probably will never watch this movie again but it was an entertaining way to spend 100 minutes.
My own rule of thumb is that a 6 is a decently entertaining movie and a 7 is worth watching more than once. I probably will never watch this movie again but it was an entertaining way to spend 100 minutes.
I totally understand if you already voted not useful. I can't always explain what I think or what goes on ... thought process and all that. I just type what comes to mind. Now I'm not suggesting the scriptwriter here had the same inclinations. Especially because this is based on a novel that I have not read yet (so no comparisons I can make to that).
Interesting premise, interesting story to say the least. Gets way cliche towards the end, so a bit of letdown. At least I felt that way. I would have gone higher rating, if it didn't try to just ... do the easy way out. But still for the very powerful beginning and a lot of visual and otherwise treats this serves you, I think one can watch this and be entertained (if you are into horror science fiction stuff).
Interesting premise, interesting story to say the least. Gets way cliche towards the end, so a bit of letdown. At least I felt that way. I would have gone higher rating, if it didn't try to just ... do the easy way out. But still for the very powerful beginning and a lot of visual and otherwise treats this serves you, I think one can watch this and be entertained (if you are into horror science fiction stuff).
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film is based on the 2012 novel "Break My Heart 1,000 Times" by Daniel Waters.
- PatzerWhile Ronnie and Kirk are talking next to his car, the water tower in the background clearly says CARMAN. This is the town in Manitoba where some filming took place, though the movie's primary setting is fictional Jewel City, Illinois.
- Zitate
Dr. Martin Steiner: The laws are lies, Miss Calder... bedtime stories for children to shut their eyes.
[chuckles]
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is I Still See You?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Break My Heart 1000 Times
- Drehorte
- Winnipeg, Manitoba, Kanada(Abandoned Factory)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 1.359 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 815 $
- 14. Okt. 2018
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.620.637 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 38 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What is the Japanese language plot outline for I Still See You - Sie lassen dich nicht ruhen (2018)?
Antwort