Charles Dickens' Große Erwartungen

maybe it is not the best adaptation. but it has the flavor of novel. Douglas Booth is , maybe, a too modern Pip, more interesting as Romeo or Lancelot but almost strange for this role. the good part - Gillian Anderson who is the inspired choice for Lady Havisham and a huge surprise for many viewers. a series who is more than seductive or beautiful. it is not exactly an adaptation but useful support for remember parts from book. that is its basic virtue - a film like a travel. not just extraordinary but special. not only for atmosphere but for a kind of flavor who is not only part of a great cast or script innovations. a film for remember. that could be the definition. beautiful and correct.

I suppose, a noble job, result of good intentions , with some ambition to impress. Not a bad result. Only a seductive story in not , always, proper clothes. But it has the chance to give fair atmosphere and few beautiful to admirable examples of construction of characters.

The mistake - Douglas Booth can be a beautiful Romeo but not the fair Pip. His good intentions are , maybe the main handicap in this sense.

The great good point - Miss Havisham proposed by Gillian anderson. I admitt, Great Expectations is a novel who I love . Miss Havisham is the character who i admire. So, Mrs. Anderson has the inspired art to give new nuances, interesting at whole, to a character who seems so simple to define.

While I have read 'Great Expectations' probably about three times in my life and am blown away every single time I do- I find that I have yet to find a film that captures the importance and reverence that the book generates. I understand that film is not suppose to replace the book- but interpret for the screen, it becomes troublesome when certain aspects are not done properly and therefor the story suffers- this occurs in books, just as is does in film. The BBC adaptation is not a disappointment, necessarily, but it lacks in certain areas that cannot be over looked.

I start with what was good- First, the scenery and cinematography was spot on, from the home of childhood Pip, to the streets of London, it was close to what I experience when I read the book. Miss Havisham's home was perfect. It was a ghost of a home, just as she represents a ghost of a woman. There was just enough creepiness and sorrow with a dash of destruction. It may seem silly, but the scene- is almost a character in film- there is a deep impact or lack that can come from how something is represented visually.

Everything from Pip's transformation from blacksmith to gentlemen was well done. Douglas Booth's (Pip) physical appearance did not change, but using clothes, there is a reality to his progression that is necessary to the story and was handled well. I am constantly blown away with regard to BBC Masterpiece Theaters ability to take me to a different place and time so masterfully and 'Expectation' was no different.

Second, Jillian Andreson's Miss Havisham was great. I thought she captured how love is a true destroyer well. When she was in any scene she was the center- she hold the audience with her use of voice and appearance. It was amazing. Shaun Dooley was also very good as Pip's uncle and teacher, Joe Gargery. I thought that he played the 'father figure' well and when he confronted Pip about his behavior and new life-he demanded attention to not only Pip's choices, but as the book captures so well, the deeper themes of social class struggles, family versus money and honesty all took center stage. His performance was a joy to watch. The minor characters, such as Able Magwitch (Ray Winstone), Herbert Pocket (Harry Lloyd) and Jaggers (David Suchet) were also very good and fit nicely into their individual roles.

The bad was really not all that bad for all intensive purposes, but I felt that a few things just brought down the film adaption.

Pip. Oh, Pip. Played by Douglas Booth, who is perfectly wonderful to look at was flat. I never felt the passion that he carried for Estella, which is suppose to be the center of the tale. At its foundation 'Expectations' is a story about love and desire, and I do not think that it was captured here. Since it was clear early on in this adaptation that Estella and Pip encompassed the main theme, it was on the shoulders of Booth to carry the film and he struggled. Perhaps he was too young of a choice to play Pip, while he is close to the actual age of Pip in the book, but he seemed to struggle with how to emphasize his desire, his call for greatness. Booth's performance was not terrible, but it was not great and that was what it needed to be.

The same problem occurred with the female lead, Vanassa Kirby, who played Estella. I understand that she is mean to be a destroyer of men, but she came off as if she was a robot. Seriously, there was nothing to her and that is NOT how she is suppose to be. Ugh, I just do not even want to think about it.

Overall, this adaption was not bad, but it failed where it mattered and left me skeptical of how many more Dicken's classics will be interpreted. Keep the cinematography guys, the music, the costume, the adult actors- but find young actor who can act- not just look the part, but be the beloved character.

The film is a decent adaptation based on Charles Dickens's novel, being very fine directed by Brian Kirk. In the movie there's drama, a love story , emotion, tragedies and results to be pretty enjoyable. The TV miniseries deals with an orphan child called Pip (Douglas Booth) meets on the dark moor an escaped convict hiding out in the Victorian English countryside called Magwitch (Ray Winstone) and helps him. A kindness that will change the course of Pip's life, though he doesn't realize it . Magwitch escapes and is aided by young orphan Pip; then Magwitch discovers a fortune. Later on, at a musty mansion Pip meets an old woman, Miss Havershan (Gillian Armstrong), and a beautiful girl called Stella (once grown-up Vanessa Kirby) who has been raised by the eccentric Miss Havershan. Pit suddenly becomes an elegant gentleman with the support of an unknown benefactor and his advocate. But his enemies would like to get Pip's inheritance for themselves . Meanwhile , Pip befriends Herbert Pocket (Harry Lloyd) and Dolge Orlick (Jack Roth). Everything can change in a heartbeat !.

The miniseries in three episodes is an alright adaptation based on Charles Dickens's novel, being pretty well directed by craftsman director Brian Kirk (The day of Jackal (2023), 21 Bridges (2019), Game of Thrones (2011) and Luther (2010)). In the movie there is dramatic events, romance and betrayals, though I has more style than substance. The images and settings are compelling and really luxurious, though the filmmaker should have learned that beauty on the surface isn't all essential. This is a respectable but sometimes slow-moving recounting about notorious novel, being competently performed, splendidly staged with adequate sets, stunning visuals and interesting drama of a well known story . Brian Kirk's professional retelling of Dickens tone but easily dwarfed by the classic 1946 David Lean's version. Well-acted by all , but especially by Gillian Armstrong's slightly pathetic and mad Miss Havishan decided to wreak havoc on the male gender. Douglas Booth's enjoyable acting as starring, he's romantic , friendly , attractive but also vulnerable and memorable. And David Suchet as lawyer Jaggers is top notch, as well as a large and fine secondary cast, such as Jack Roth, Tom Burke, Paul Rhys, Shaun Dooley, Mark Addy, Harry Lloyd, Charlie Creed-Miles, Susan Lynch, Paul Ritter, Perdita Weeks, Frances Barber. Special mention to Ray Winstone as the unknown benefactor who becomes himself a wealthy man with a big fortune, which he decides to use to make good purports. It contains glamorous as well as colorful cinematography by Florian Hoffmeister. Evocative and sensitive musical score by Natalie Holt and Martin Phipps. Rating : 7/10. Above Average . Well worth seeing for Charles Dickens lovers .

There are many adaptations about this famous novel, they turn out to be the following : ¨Great expectations¨ (1934) by Stuart Walker with Phillips Holmes , Henry Hull , Jane Wyatt , Florence Reed. ¨Great expectations¨ (1946) by David Lean considered to be the greatest version of the Charles Dickens novel with impressive black and white cinematography by Guy Green, starring John Mills, Alec Guinness, Jean Simmons, Finlay Currie, Anthony Wager. ¨Great Expectations¨(1974) by Joseph Harvey with Michael York, Sarah Miles, James Mason. ¨Great Expectations¨ (1998) recent rendition by Alfonso Cuarón with Ethan Hawke as Pit , Gwyneth Paltrow as Stella and Anne Bancroft as Miss Havershan, it is deemed average. ¨Great expectations¨ (2012) by Mike Newell with Ralph Fiennes, Ewen Bremner , Olly Alexander , Sally Hawkes , Holliday Grangier, Jason Fleming. And several TV adaptations and miniseries such as : 1981 with Bratford Jones and John Hickson ; 1987 The untold story with John Stanton , Sigrid Thornton , Anne Louise Lambert , 1989 by Kevin Connor with Anthony Hopkins , Jean Simmons , John Rhys Davies , 1999 by Julian Jarrold with Ioan Gruffudd, Justine Waddell, Charlotte Rampling, Bernard Hill .

I don't want to go into too much detail or else it will be thoroughly spoiled. I anticipated this adaptation for months, being a great Dickens fan, especially after the BBC's magnificent adaptation of Bleak House.

Similar problems always arise in these adaptations, both suffered from an absence of some key characters (although the latter had more episodes, and didn't suffer as a result) so here as a result the character development is not as it should have been.

I was impressed however by how much of the plot they fit into just 3 episodes over Christmas, and the pace was terrific. There were flaws in the script, where Bleak House took plenty of quotes from the novel, this didn't and therefore doesn't feel as fleshy or ultimately, Dickensian. Why change the best form?

I commend the cinematographers. One really felt the setting as it was written. Now onto the major successes and faults; casting.

Douglas Booth as the protagonist tried but came off as a bit too wooden. He also looked far too attractive (which of course is not an insult) but it didn't really work.

It is nice to see Claire Rushbrook again. Not seen her since Secrets & Lies. She was very convincing as Mrs Joe. Shaun Dooley was excellent as Joe Gargery, as were Harry Lloyd as Herbert Pocket, Jack Roth as Orlick, David Suchet as Jaggers and Ray Winstone definitely brought great life and humanity to the dreaded Magwitch.

My hat though must go off to Gillian Anderson, although many have thought her wrong for the part, let me explain why she was so good and right for the role.

Although Miss Havisham has been typically played as elderly, and her age is never specified really in the book, she was almost married as a teenager, and the time passing would place her in her forties, to early fifties. This makes Anderson, if anything, TOO YOUNG for the role, and the original "best" Martita Hunt, was only some years older. Of course she has been aged by her style of existence. Anderson did look more worn and ethereal as the series progressed. People also seemed to have a problem with her voice.

I see the childish voice as her being trapped in her 18 year old self, which presumably is the age she was jilted, so like the rest of the house, time stopped at that point, which is why she had a similar childish outburst when her relatives visited. I think Anderson's performance therefore is rather genius. One can really feel the angst, anger, regret she feels. I would have preferred a more dramatic apology to Pip in the end, but I suppose it was more subtle. Anderson again impresses in a Dickensian role, showing something completely different to her outstanding portrayal of Lady Dedlock.

It is her impressive work which for me gives this a 7 over 6. Oh and the intro sequence was quite beautiful. Slightly disappointing but overall an engaging adaptation, with a brave effort by Anderson which should really be recognised by BAFTA.

Dooley, Roth, Winstone and Lloyd should all create some buzz too.