IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,6/10
3510
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Frau, die nach einer Überdosis an einer mysteriösen Krankheit leidet, kehrt in das Haus ihrer Kindheit zurück, um sich ihren persönlichen Dämonen zu stellen, doch stattdessen entdeckt s... Alles lesenEine Frau, die nach einer Überdosis an einer mysteriösen Krankheit leidet, kehrt in das Haus ihrer Kindheit zurück, um sich ihren persönlichen Dämonen zu stellen, doch stattdessen entdeckt sie einen echten Dämon.Eine Frau, die nach einer Überdosis an einer mysteriösen Krankheit leidet, kehrt in das Haus ihrer Kindheit zurück, um sich ihren persönlichen Dämonen zu stellen, doch stattdessen entdeckt sie einen echten Dämon.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Intriguing beginning. Story contains good mix of mystery with supernatural horror for the first 4/5ths, but the end and the story is very unsatisfactory. The draw-in is good but Is almost as if they ran out money and concluded amongst poor lighting and severely curtail final scenes. Another way to put it was that critical scenes near the end are missing. Also, on a fear/suspense scale it's falls flat all throughout. I enjoyed the pace of the mystery and unraveling backstory. The acting is ok to good. The few special effects probably were poor so they resolve it by by under exposing, the problem is that I couldn't tell what happened in the the in the climax and the parts we do see clearly, there's no explanation.
Wasn't sure what to make of this, and in many ways it's a few different films put together. It's a mother/daughter relationship drama, it's an addiction drama, it's a folk horror and it's a body horror.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
The actors are tremendous - Kate Dickie is always good value and is deliciously insincere.
Jemima Rooper manages to make a pretty unsympathetic character somewhat likeable, though that is a bit of a flaw in the film.
The cinematography is lovely - the British countryside has never looked so desolate or haunting.
The music and sound design is incredibly atmospheric, and works in conjunction with the editing to really keep you uneasy throughout.
Perhaps by the end of the film one too many ideas have been thrown into the pot, but I really enjoyed the journey and would happily recommend it.
It's a different attempt. But a very unpleasant movie to watch. Writing is okish. Not every character is well defined. But this movie isn't about character arc and stuff.
Not exactly sure what is the mental trauma the writer / director went into to make such a movie? I can keep abusing this movie
But funny part is - I kept watching it :D. When a movie keeps you engaged then it is a success.
Ignore the negative reviews. Keep your mind very broad and go into this movie's atmosphere and it will give you some unpleasantness back. I would say that is also a kind of entertainment.
Make sure no kids are there nearby when you watch this movie.
Not exactly sure what is the mental trauma the writer / director went into to make such a movie? I can keep abusing this movie
But funny part is - I kept watching it :D. When a movie keeps you engaged then it is a success.
Ignore the negative reviews. Keep your mind very broad and go into this movie's atmosphere and it will give you some unpleasantness back. I would say that is also a kind of entertainment.
Make sure no kids are there nearby when you watch this movie.
To get that out of the way .. i rate this movie to be a bit above average.
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
If i wanted to describe a feeling in one word .. i would probably go with : uncomfortable
A bit like a Lars von Trier movie, but only half way.
Acting is good - although not very nuanced. Cinematography is sometimes good .. but not stellar - and characters act in a very artificial way .. only to support the plot, not in any way realistic (on the basis of the supernatural that is going on)
The CGI was poor ... i mean, Playstation 2 cutscene poor. It was kind of rare .. and i wonder why the movie did not use practical effects .. those would not have been too hard .. and may not have broken immersion as much as those really terrible CGI scenes.
All in all, it was worth watching - for me. But other than that ... a fairly forgettable movie without much depth or meaning (well, unless you are into rural folklore of that region or so .. maybe than there is more to get from it)
There's a really great core idea here and an overall solid story that with just a few minor tweaks could've made an absolute classic, but there's something hard to define that's not quite worked.
I can't figure out if it's the characters, the acting, the editing, or what, but for some reason I couldn't connect and wasn't absorbed on an emotional level - there was no character I was rooting for, none I was rooting against. Someone died and it was acknowledged, but I didn't care.
And if I'm not feeling something emotionally, it loses a major part of the battle for me. The brain parts of the people behind this got everything just about right, but the heart parts I think got left at home.
I can't figure out if it's the characters, the acting, the editing, or what, but for some reason I couldn't connect and wasn't absorbed on an emotional level - there was no character I was rooting for, none I was rooting against. Someone died and it was acknowledged, but I didn't care.
And if I'm not feeling something emotionally, it loses a major part of the battle for me. The brain parts of the people behind this got everything just about right, but the heart parts I think got left at home.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film's original title was "Wormeater", but was changed to "Matriarch" after network executives felt it would put off the female audience.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Matriarch?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 25 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen