Ein Serienmörder bringt ein ahnungsloses neues Opfer auf einen Wochenendausflug mit, um eine weitere Leiche in seine ständig wachsende Liste aufzunehmen. Sie verfällt seinem falschen Charme,... Alles lesenEin Serienmörder bringt ein ahnungsloses neues Opfer auf einen Wochenendausflug mit, um eine weitere Leiche in seine ständig wachsende Liste aufzunehmen. Sie verfällt seinem falschen Charme, und er giert eifrig nach Blut.Ein Serienmörder bringt ein ahnungsloses neues Opfer auf einen Wochenendausflug mit, um eine weitere Leiche in seine ständig wachsende Liste aufzunehmen. Sie verfällt seinem falschen Charme, und er giert eifrig nach Blut.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
It is a dark horror comedy comprised of separate 'acts'. The first two 'acts' are set-up. The remainder of the movie is the pay-off, featuring psychedelic gobblydegook that is purposefully weird and pretentious.
The classical art/art snob/art dealer scene is what is being mocked/sent up here, and very well. Josh Ruben brilliantly portrays a maniac who has wholly immersed himself in art snob culture, and it is that lifestyle, and his attempts to evade blame for his evil actions, that lead to the hallucinations he experiences throughout the film.
One hallucination involving the owl figure towards the end crossed the line from amusing to outright ridiculous for me, but overall I was really into it.
Also, the entire film is tied together very neatly with an excellent end scene that continues into the end credits.
If you view this movie with the above perspective--this is what a pretentious art snob foodie who happens to be a serial killer sees--then I think you'll like it more than either just trying to enjoy a horror film or trying to find some deeper meaning.
The surprise element here is whether it's the killer's mind playing games with him (after he gets hit in the head) or if he's really in a purgatory-like place where he's being psychologically tortured as punishment for the deadly sins he's committed. What also works are the two lead performances. Both Sarah Lind (as Meredith) and Josh Ruben (as Bruce) are pretty effective. While the film loses a little momentum in Act Two, the much-talked-about end credits sequence is a winner (akin to Pearl), both from the perspectives of storytelling and performances.
Writers Nathan Faudree and Travis Stevens, with the latter also directing the movie, put together a fair enough script and storyline. It was pretty straightforward, if actually not somewhat generic and predictable. But the added elements of supernatural horror definitely helped to spruce up the movie. It was an adequate movie, but nothing outstanding really.
I was not familiar with the cast ensemble in the movie, but I will say that leading actress Sarah Lind (playing Meredith Tanning) and leading actor Josh Ruben (playing Bruce Ernst) put on good performances and carried the movie quite nicely.
Visually then "A Wounded Fawn" was okay. It was not a movie that made use of an abundance of special effects or CGI, not that it really required such. Whatever effects were in the movie were fairly okay, and helped to promote whatever they were intended to do, so that means it was effective.
Director Travis Stevens makes use of some dark imagery throughout the course of the movie, especially in the last quarter of the movie, which adds something unique to the movie. And the costumes with the masks and the wardrobes definitely added a layer of oddity to the movie.
Watchable for what it was, however "A Wounded Fawn" is hardly a movie that I will ever return to watch a second time. If it worth sitting down and watching it, if you are an avid horror fan.
My rating of "A Wounded Fawn" lands on a five out of ten stars.
Even if i was not a Greek, i would still like it. There is a 70's aesthetic, great cinematography, it's a stylish and "sophisticated" movie but its not pretentious or artsy in a bad way. I have watched many "style over substance" movies, this is not one of them. But if you prefer your horror movie to be more straightforward, scarier or grittier, maybe you won't like this one. First part is intense though, more "traditional horror". But the second part is something else. It gets crazy, weird, bizarre, original and creative, paranoid, like a hallucination.
Josh Ruben's acting seems kinda awkward but it's exactly as the director asked from him. At least, i think so. In a way, this weird acting fits perfectly in this weird movie. Lind is great, too.
I am not saying that it's a perfect movie. There is a thin line between originality and ridiculousness, and balancing in this line, is difficult. There are many people that won't like it because they will find it nonsensical, ridiculous, artsy. I can see why this is polarising. As i said, it's not an easy balance. In my opinion though, this movie succeed. And there is the most strange/unexpected ending i have watched recently, but i like it too. In any case, it is satisfying.
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe statue is of The Wrath of the Erinyes
- PatzerDespite using an Android phone, Meredith's text messages play sounds from Apple's iMessage.
- Zitate
Meredith Tanning: Wow. This is...
Bruce Ernst: I said it was remote. Don't worry.
Meredith Tanning: I'm not worried. It's just...
Bruce Ernst: What?
Meredith Tanning: It's dark as hell.
Bruce Ernst: Well, yeah. That's just the woods.
Meredith Tanning: Yeah. No kidding.
- SoundtracksNothing's Gonna Hurt You Baby
Written by Greg Gonzalez
Performed by Cigarettes After Sex
Courtesy of Partisan Records
Top-Auswahl
- How long is A Wounded Fawn?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Im Kopf des Killers
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 31 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1