Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe world-famous singing preteen chipmunk trio return to contend with the pressures of school, celebrity, and a rival female music group known as The Chipettes.The world-famous singing preteen chipmunk trio return to contend with the pressures of school, celebrity, and a rival female music group known as The Chipettes.The world-famous singing preteen chipmunk trio return to contend with the pressures of school, celebrity, and a rival female music group known as The Chipettes.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 wins total
Justin Long
- Alvin
- (Synchronisation)
Matthew Gray Gubler
- Simon
- (Synchronisation)
Jesse McCartney
- Theodore
- (Synchronisation)
Amy Poehler
- Eleanor
- (Synchronisation)
Anna Faris
- Jeanette
- (Synchronisation)
Christina Applegate
- Brittany
- (Synchronisation)
Anjelah Johnson-Reyes
- Julie
- (as Anjelah Johnson)
Chris Warren
- Xander
- (as Chris Warren Jr.)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I asked my 11 year old and 7 year old daughters what they thought of this film. They both loved it.
The 3 on IMDb is a bit misleading. This is a film for children, not a campaign to win an Academy Award! Obviously there are people out there who take things a little toooooo seriously when rating kid's movies.
My 11 year old daughter writes the following: the movie was great. i love the sounds of those little voices. why are kids films usually getting a 2,3,4? the film the music, adventure,scenes were all entertaining for me.
Remember folks, this is a film for children, the chipmunks have been around for more than 30 years so they must be doing something right. If you want to over analyze a film then do a search on the French new age section and go your hardest, on the other hand if you are looking for pure entertainment for your under 12's then go no further.
The 3 on IMDb is a bit misleading. This is a film for children, not a campaign to win an Academy Award! Obviously there are people out there who take things a little toooooo seriously when rating kid's movies.
My 11 year old daughter writes the following: the movie was great. i love the sounds of those little voices. why are kids films usually getting a 2,3,4? the film the music, adventure,scenes were all entertaining for me.
Remember folks, this is a film for children, the chipmunks have been around for more than 30 years so they must be doing something right. If you want to over analyze a film then do a search on the French new age section and go your hardest, on the other hand if you are looking for pure entertainment for your under 12's then go no further.
I don't understand the severely low rating for this film. 2.7?
I was prepared for something awful but wanted to do something with the 4 younger kids before they headed back to school.
This is the movie they wanted to see.
I've seen a lot of kids' movies and this is definitely among the funnier ones I've seen.
My 8-year-old and I sat next to each other and had a hard time controlling our laughter on a few occasions.
I told my husband he definitely has to see this when it comes out on video. I can't wait to watch it with him!
Give it a try - maybe even risk raising your expectations a little!
I was prepared for something awful but wanted to do something with the 4 younger kids before they headed back to school.
This is the movie they wanted to see.
I've seen a lot of kids' movies and this is definitely among the funnier ones I've seen.
My 8-year-old and I sat next to each other and had a hard time controlling our laughter on a few occasions.
I told my husband he definitely has to see this when it comes out on video. I can't wait to watch it with him!
Give it a try - maybe even risk raising your expectations a little!
Let's face it: "The Chipmunks" is a pretty thin premise. Once you get past the novelty of squeaky voiced animated rodents, there's really not much there. So this movie's straight-line, A to B to C story is a serious drawback.
Director Betty Thomas doesn't get a whole lot out of the cast (although, to be honest, I don't expect much in the way of high-caliber acting in movies like this), and the whole thing has a bit of a TV-movie feel, but the animation is rather good, and the film moves moves along at a pretty good clip, so even adults won't get too bored.
Certainly, for some reviewers, a film like this, in the final analysis, is perfectly acceptable, since it's "for kids," and thus the only thing that counts is whether it's "entertaining" on some basic level, regardless of its actual quality. That's a pretty common attitude toward kids' films, and one that really sells children short, as if they have no interest in character or story. They do, just like anyone else, albeit on a less sophisticated level than (most) adults. For example, I know that a lot of reviewers hated "Hotel for Dogs" but that film had an engaging story, well-drawn characters and a story that, while ultimately predictable, still held a few twists and turns. It wasn't particularly good, but it was better than this film.
Director Betty Thomas doesn't get a whole lot out of the cast (although, to be honest, I don't expect much in the way of high-caliber acting in movies like this), and the whole thing has a bit of a TV-movie feel, but the animation is rather good, and the film moves moves along at a pretty good clip, so even adults won't get too bored.
Certainly, for some reviewers, a film like this, in the final analysis, is perfectly acceptable, since it's "for kids," and thus the only thing that counts is whether it's "entertaining" on some basic level, regardless of its actual quality. That's a pretty common attitude toward kids' films, and one that really sells children short, as if they have no interest in character or story. They do, just like anyone else, albeit on a less sophisticated level than (most) adults. For example, I know that a lot of reviewers hated "Hotel for Dogs" but that film had an engaging story, well-drawn characters and a story that, while ultimately predictable, still held a few twists and turns. It wasn't particularly good, but it was better than this film.
Today I had to sit through this movie several times. :-(
As an adult, it wasn't funny or entertaining. But what amused me was the reaction from the kids in the audiences. Almost none of the kids laughed out loud during the matinée viewing (the showing with the most kids in attendance).
Some take away comments from the mouth of babes: "Is it over YET?" "I'm bored" and my personal favorite "That wasn't so funny at all." (poor kid said it over and over again with the "big" jokes.) Plus, I had never seen so many kids ready to leave after the first 15 minutes.
It didn't get better over the course of the evening.
As an adult, it wasn't funny or entertaining. But what amused me was the reaction from the kids in the audiences. Almost none of the kids laughed out loud during the matinée viewing (the showing with the most kids in attendance).
Some take away comments from the mouth of babes: "Is it over YET?" "I'm bored" and my personal favorite "That wasn't so funny at all." (poor kid said it over and over again with the "big" jokes.) Plus, I had never seen so many kids ready to leave after the first 15 minutes.
It didn't get better over the course of the evening.
You know this still works for the little ones, but will appall a lot older viewers, than say the first one did. It's basically more of the same, even with the addition of some Chipmunks "rivals" (another group of talking ...). The little ones won't mind (I watched it with my nephew and he enjoyed it), but what about the parents? There are other movies that can please both.
Still not really that bad, you can watch this in its own right or at least put the kids there and let them enjoy it. It's like the Chipmunks won't grow up (literally and physically that is), but again it's only us grown-ups that will think about things like that.
Still not really that bad, you can watch this in its own right or at least put the kids there and let them enjoy it. It's like the Chipmunks won't grow up (literally and physically that is), but again it's only us grown-ups that will think about things like that.
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesJason Lee was meant to have a larger role in this film, but his screen time was rewritten shorter than planned due to scheduling conflicts with My Name Is Earl (2005). Most of his scenes were filled in with Zachary Levi's character, Toby Seville.
- Patzer(at around 58 mins) At the sing-off, when the Chipettes are singing, Ian uses his phone to make a video. He says "If you like what you see, call Ian Hawke...." however, when the video is seen on a website by some record executives, Ian says "If you're interested..."
- Crazy CreditsAfter the very last credit scrolls off the top of the screen, there is one more little scene.
- Alternative VersionenWhen the movie is aired on Freeform in, Ian Hawke's phone number is muted (which is odd, since the number doesn't exist in the first place) and references to "The Donald" (as in Trump) are removed entirely.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Trailer Failure: Legion, Transylmania, Avatar & The Squeakquel (2009)
- SoundtracksYou Really Got Me
Written by Ray Davies
Featuring Honor Society
Honor Society performs courtesy of Jonas Records/Hollywood Records
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Alvin y las ardillas 2
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 75.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 219.614.612 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 48.875.415 $
- 27. Dez. 2009
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 443.140.005 $
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen