Benutzerrezensionen

While the judge, bailiff and professional consultants are REAL,the PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT are POORLY TRAINED ACTORS... 😠😠

Just seen an episode where the plaintiff was awarded almost $300,00 for her ignorance at a concert sound check. Common sense is to not stand beside a 6 ft speaker during sound check as well as wear earplugs which were available! It was on the back of her VIP badge and she neglected to read it yet she was awarded the full amount of her complaint because of her irresponsibility. Not the worst ruling on this show but in the top 5.

Yes, this is fake. Yes the plaintiffs and defendants are actors and actresses. The award, usually in the hundreds of thousands, tend to be problematic. I would think such high amount would require lawyers and juries to present the case. Plus prior to the court, the judge tends to determine if there is plausible suit before allowing it to go forward. So it's not a one day type of incident unless you're going to a small claims court where the maximum is usually set to 5,000 or so.

Most of the cases on this show involve a one-time incident where the plaintiff enters the defendant's property and somehow gets injured. Such things like getting attacked by an animal, getting hit by something or somehow falling down. Most of the judgement are very simple and too simple for the value of which is awarded. Most of the fitness related cases are obviously fake. Many gyms and facilities make you sign a waiver which is impossible for the courts to assign fault unless the fitness place did something obviously different from just offering fitness. Plus nearly every single house related incident in this show would be covered by your home owners insurance. There is no way they can double sue you after getting money from the insurance company and then in turn to sue you. The case would most likely be thrown out unless you didn't pay for your insurance or your insurance found you at fault and refused to pay.

If you don't believe these are fake, try looking up some of the cases name. There was one episode of a singer doing a stage dive and ending up drop kicking a fan in the back of the head. The singer does not exist anywhere despite the supposedly popularity of the singer having a tour.

Regardless, the show is rather interesting. I like the end where the lawyers come on and explain their opinions on the results. I do believe these are real lawyers but their opinions are based on the fake show. They do have a number listed under their name and they seem to exist but they are all personal injury lawyers.

This is very disappointing to know that all Litigants are not real and are actors Only. Very disappointing to know. Ugh 😐.

Frivolous lawsuits + dramatic fever + bad acting + ridiculous awards = total waste of airtime.

The only entertainment we ever got from watching this show was betting on how many thousands of dollars would be awarded to the plaintiff.. Stupid decisions; no rhyme or reason for the decisions. Who awards someone with $ 170,000 for zits they got from someone's hot tub? I find it hard to believe that this episode is a reenactment of a real court proceeding that occurred somewhere in this country.

bad acting, very flakey actors, it's laughable. There must be something with more credibility that could be aired. This show insults the intelligence of reasonable people.

Very badly acted.This is not a real show.It is ridiculous.

The judge's verdict awards are laughable and completely unrealistic. None of the defendants would come close to being able to pay these excessive, comical verdict amounts. THAT is not mentioned; the plaintiffs have to actually COLLECT those outlandish verdicts - not likely. I'm in the Personal injury biz and know. I do get a good laugh out of the show.

If you're in a sad or bad mood, take a look at this show. It's unbelievably funny! I really didn't want to believe it, but I just had to Google the show and found that the cases are re enactments. That's fine, but the actors are just the bottom of the barrel.

Okay so i see most reviews saying his program is nothing but fake well if you dont go in looking for realness you might find you enjoy this show cause real or fake its extrmely fun to watch happy watching

I been watching the show, some of the people are so fake in there crying, there is never tears, and they over react, and another thing some of these people i think are out for the money, some of them put them2 in harm way them turn around and sue, come on u put yourself in a bad situation and u know u r at fault and have the nerve to sue someone there is something wrong with that picture and as for the judge some of your verdict is so wrong and the plaintiffs dont deserve a win in their case. Just like the show i watched the lady spills sour cream and leaves never reports it, then comes back and sees that it is still there, and she walks through it and wins what the heck, if she reported the mess it would of got cleaned up, how was the workers or owner know that there was a spill, if the plaintiff saw that it was still there why would she go down that aisle she was out for money and in my eyes that was her fault she was hurt. To the judge your ruling was wrong in so many ways. There are other cases that people shouldn't of won. The judge tocme only hears what he wants to hear.

I and and another family member love Personal Injury Court. Judge Gino is always fair and leaves me wondering how he's going to rule. He abides by the law and hears each litigant ample opportunities to plead their case. I wish more judges handled cases as he does.

I'm his number one fan and appreciate his fairness and honesty even when I want the outcome to be otherwise.

Thank you Judge Gino for your sincerity and forthrightness when hearing the cases that come before you. Some of the injuries presente sixes are so horrific and yet you review all ensuring fairness. I love your show and wish you had more than 2 hours of showtime.

Don't care if it's fake. It's fun to watch Judge Gino Bronson is a good funny judge that being said I give it 8 Stars if they didn't show the same episode everyday I've seen the same episodes over and over I saw there's 120 some episodes y do they only play a few episodes over and over. Someone's looking at these reviews that can do something about this please stop showing the same episodes over and over on Bounce TV.

While most TV shows are indeed scripted to some extent, the Executive Produce refuses to admit it, saying he wouldn't personally use the terms "scripted" or "actors". Since each episode is based on headline cases and not real parties, those individuals mu be represented by... actors. In order to properly represent the cases they were not personally involved in, those actors must then follow a... script.

I get it - a lot of shows have scripts! It is just very hard to take the show seriously. What could perhaps be a great competitor to the likes of other daytime court shows, Personal Injury Court takes overacting and wild judgements (many cases are split liability with no explanation of division) to a whole new level. Dramatic scenes of near-fainting in court, wild "crying" episodes without a single tear shed - it is all just too much.

The people look like they are acting. Their injuries bandages sometimes looks like cosplay.

If they are hurt physically, emotionally and financially then why are there so much laughter coming from the judge, audience, def and plaintiff.

Maybe it's real and they are just mocking the people by loose exaggerating and being jokey about almost every case. Iunno?

The show is beyond fake and obviously fake. The injured party is always still injured with an arm in a sling, on crutches, bandages, etc Even if the injury supposedly happed months ago. I watched one where a doctor vacationing at a resort fell off a cliff near the hotel. Well i googled the doctor. No info on him. Most doctors would have some mention somewhere on a hospital staff list or personal site. The resort does not exist. Closest thing i found to it has no hiking trails anywhere near it. So what resort is not on google maps nor has a website?

The acting is terrible. This is more of a train wreck type of watch. You want to look away but can't.

Lol omg, like really? The only reason I'm giving 1 star is because it REALLY GOES BASED ON THE LAW & ACTUAL LITIGATION! Because the actual litigation and laws are true. And the other star is for the comedy of the acting of these people (kmsl) that go on this show I've been involved in accidents before before you even get to court for personal injury you're not wearing a brace anymore you're not wearing a fake horrible make up black eye... You're not in a wheelchair unless you're paralyzed it's like they take them straight off the street say I'll give you $a couple of hundred dollars if u have "any skills with bad acting" Like I said the other star is because of how much I laugh.. The preposterous acting and fake make up really entertain me. Like who would really come on the showof this show cause if you watch closely they aren't looking at him in his eyes,speaking to the "JUDGE ".. So it's like I'm watching a bad movie that that is portraying to be true. ALSO THEIR injuries are fresh! And movie makeup. BAD MOVIE MAKEUP because of it were good then I wouldn't be able to tell,not to mention their still fresh scars and in body braces. In reality by the time you get to court Your injuries have healed and generally you have a personal injury lawyer. Just saying. Like I said I gave it 1 star only because it is actual litigation that's That's true to the law books of whatever State that the case comes from.

It's mostly a "He-Said-She-Said" kind of scenario, and the one who were able to convince the judge somehow gets a favorable ruling. The factors such as some people are not as Articulate or as Coherent as others are totally disregarded. The judge only allows third party resources that will help him understand more the nature of injury, or how some things work. Take the case of the aged dog lover that "slipped on a puddle of dog pee". It could have been settled with an invitation to the first aid responder to verify IF there was or there wasn't a puddle of pee that caused the old woman to slip. I'm just sorry for those defendants who don't get to articulate themselves more.

This is the only show I get to watch at work on lunch. Love it so fun Gino the best

This show has gross acting is pathetic. The only reason I watch nothing better on at the time shown. Lol. Got like 200 channels. Nothing better lol.

I have always enjoyed the show. Judge Gino, however, needs to get better control of his courtroom. Litigants should not be talking to each other or speaking out of turn.

I had a feeling this show was fake, but I Googled it anyways...and it is. How is this ok? I hadn't watched in a while, but today I did and there was this case about bats attacking some lady...and no lie, she "came to court" with somehow bright red, fresh-looking cuts and scratched on her arms...and face! I had to look this show up after that. At first I thought it was a show for people who wanted to straight milk their injuries for everthing they're worth. But after I saw those red Sharpie marks all over her body, I knew it was bs. For shame, it's like they're not even trying to make it believable.

They should put a 0 rate star because that is what my actual rating is, 0. There's nothing i like about this show.