Benutzerrezensionen

It's safe to say this is far from argento's best work but certainly not his worst. One or two good kills and some decent cinematography. Plus the soundtrack is a good listen. Overall no classic but worth tracking down.

The past 15 years have been really hard on Dario Argento fans. Dracula 3-D & Giallo were the lowest of the low and Dark Glasses is a faint improvement. The biggest issue with recent Argento films seem to be the low budgets. It's not as if his early work was mega budgets but the past few movies he seems to be working from the biscuit tin. The style and flair that went with his earlier work is just not there any more. This movie has a nice soundtrack and is Argento all over however that appears to be the only thing remaining.

Ilenia Pastorelli is the lead role and it's not unfair to say she isn't the best actress in the world. Asia Argento is in this and is given nothing to do and makes you wonder if she would have been the lead if this movie was made in 2002 when Dario Argento wanted to film it.

The movie climaxes with a typical ridiculous killer reveal and goes full on Cujo remake. Anyone watching this would perceive this as someone doing a bad Argento movie and not the great man himself. People would be best off watching Deep Red again.

I have seen Occhiali neri last night at FEST - International Film Festival, Belgrade . It's a very strange Iittle thriller, very bizarre and very low budget. The plot is extremely silly, with water snakes and other over-the-top decisions, but that's Argento for you. We don't expect logic in his films. Do we? There is warmth in it as well, it's very character driven. It feels rushed in places and acting is so-so, but overall you should definitely see if you're Argento fan. It's his best since Nonhosonno, fast paced and never boring. And yes... it's very gory. The third act reminded me of the begining of Rob Zombie's Halloween 2, because it's basically a long chase scene in the countryside. The OST is great.

I've already seen this movie twice in a 3 days time.

The first time i mostly noticed what was NOT there:

• many choreographed murders
• the surprise/shock of finding out who the killer is
• the close ups of gloved hands and weapons to kill the victims

And in a Dario Argento's movie, for anyone familiar with his style, that is A LOT missing.

But the second view made me appreciate more the film in its own right to "exist".

I recognized in it the same sort of empathy towards the main character that i felt in Phenomena, Opera, Trauma.

Technically thumbs up for the score and cinematography.

Good performance from Asia Argento.

Nov 22

So here we have Dario Argentos latest film, with the english title of "Dark Glasses".

I has seen all the average reviews, so was pleasantly surprised to find it pretty decent and definitely above average.

Dario would of been 81/82 years old making this, and he has still got it, and hopefully will continue to make more.

I must confess i knew Asia Argento was in it, but it took me awhile to spot her.

Of course it isnt upto his great giallos of the 70s and 80s, but its worthy in this day and age.

I cant see me watching 40 or 50 times but i will watch it again.

Deserves a much better IMDB score.

7.5 from me.

Went into this with high hopes since it was Argento but unfortunately it is like recent disappointments from Argento which blotch his legendary name. The high points of this film is the extreme Argento gore we have come to all love. This does have some very interesting and unusual camera work and visuals. I wouldn't recommend going out and buying this unless you are an extreme Argento fan, I would wait until it goes on to some streaming site or The Horror Channel. I am still at a loss why this is advertised with They Live homages in the poster as it has nothing to do with They Live in the actual film.

I don't know what the bad reviews are about. I was pleasantly surprised with this. I love horror but giallo isn't my favorite, although Suspiria is in my top 10. To me giallo is gore and bad character development. This had what was missing in most other Italian horror films that I couldn't seem to get into. Real human connection, but it was still an obvious Argento movie. I actually cared wether these people lived or died, the dog too. This was a great film from a great director who's grown with time. Stop living in the past. I look forward to his next, and if this is his last, it's a great movie to end on.

As a well-documented Dario Argento fanboy, I really rooted for the film to be on par with his 70s and early 80s cult classics. The opening sequences (and most of act one) were indeed made up of beautifully colour saturated- and uniquely constructed scenes; shot in an elevated 'Profondo rosso' style. However, the too thin storyline, lack of suspense and ridiculous snake- and mauling sequences did not work at all and merely made "Occhiali Neri' another Argento homage to his earlier work. It's worth watching solely as a beautifully shot example of classic (albeit toned down) Argento Giallo, which makes it still deserving of a 7/10.

This movie follows the style and the problems of the last films of the famous Italian director, the first ones were brilliant, and then a series of failures. The most astonishing thing is the terrible acting and the few ideas with an extremely simple plot, and easy to predict.

I guess you could call Dark Glasses a return to form for Dario Argento in the sense that it's better than Dracula 3D. It more or less feels like an actual film, and while it's a bit too simple and not particularly exciting, outside a couple of brief moments here and there, it's arguably competent enough to be sort of watchable. It's certainly not a return to form in the sense that it rivals the filmmaker's best stuff, even if the premise here is something that's easy to imagine Argento tackling in the 1970s or 80s.

I've been on a bit of a binge of the filmmaker's work for research/writing purposes, but I think I might bow out gracefully here. I've seen about 80% of his features, I think? It feels like enough for me, because while the only genuinely bad one I've seen has been Dracula 3D, the majority of his 1990s to 21st-century stuff has done very little for me. But it's been somewhat worthwhile to watch most of his stuff, and I think doing so will make me appreciate his earlier movies even more, should I revisit any of them one day.

I found the film a little bit lacking. This is a slasher film and not Citizen Kane! Dario has done some great innovative stuff over the years and while this not being one of them I found it entertaining.

'Dark Glasses' is the latest project from legendary filmmaker Dario Argento that showed up as a Shudder original with little to no fanfare. The 82 year old director is best known for the films he made from 1970 into the late 80's and for helping to popularize the Italian genre of the "giallo" thriller. His fame mostly comes from his extremely inventive choices and daring camera work. Very much an artist who valued style over substance, he made some great movies ('Suspiria,' Deep Red'), some bad ('Inferno,' 'Mother of Tears') and a few truely bizarre ones ('Phenomena'). After 1987's 'Opera' many argue that his career went downhill fast. It's true that going into the 90's the quality of his output greatly decreases. There are a couple of projects that aren't terrible ('The Stendhal Syndrome,' 'Trauma') but that's about it.

'Dark Glasses,' his first movie in ten years, does mean that his last film won't end up being 'Dracula' - which was pathetic and embarrassing on every single level. That's the good news, however his latest is hardly a spectacular comeback. The story is very "giallo-esque" in nature featuring a mysterious killer who targets prostitutes. Our main character Diana (Ilenia Pastorelli), a lady of the night, crosses paths with said killer resulting in a car accident that takes her eyesight. It also results in an unlikely friendship with a young boy named Chin (Andrea Zhang). She is also helped during her recovery process by a professional blind person therapist (?) played by Asia Argento. So the scene is set for a 'Wait Until Dark' type thriller as the maniac remembers that he wants to kill her and then kind of tries to do that sometimes..

The film isn't really concerned with the mystery aspect of the story, it only gives you one red herring so it's pretty easy to figure out who the killer is. Much of the run time is dedicated to Diana's relationship with Chin, creating a certain amount of heart that's usually absent in this type of film. It's kind of touching in spots although mostly forgotten as everybody starts running away from the murderer because they don't want to get murdered. Once the movie settles into the thriller aspects it loses steam, becoming pretty routine. There are some trademark lapses in logic as well, like why the killer doesn't try try to finish the job during Diana's weeks (or months, possibly years?) of rehabilitation where she's vulnerable and alone much of the time, only striking when there's lots of police officers hanging around.

Some of the positives: The performances are pretty good, they use practical effects instead of CGI for most of gags and the musical score captures past Goblin vibes fairly well. The main problem with 'Dark Glasses' is that it's so average. There are some Argento touches like the tracking shot along a wall lit by primary colors panning down to actors running down an ally, or a brief shot from a dog's point of view but there's nothing much here to remind us of the great talent behind the camera. It's good to see him back with this, as well as his recent lead performance in Gasper Noe's 'Vortex.' Hopefully we're experiencing a late career renaissance for Argento, I also hope his next picture is a true return to form. 5/10.

As with most Argento films this one has a handful of plot holes. The actors are not that good. The scenery is a bit like in a TV movie. Nothing new for Argento fans so far.

Now the good things: the murder scenes are gruesome and the music terrorizes the viewer even more. The idea to have a buddy movie between a blind prostitute and a child orphan in a horror film is something refreshingly new. The dog scenes are great and the car driving action scenes are suspenseful. This is obviously one of his better films. Loved the cinematic experience, might watch it again.

Americans like to say they like Giallo, mainly because they know what an influence on the slasher film those films had. But really, other than a sampling of Bava, Argento, and Fulci, and only them because they saw their other work, it hasn't been a huge sell in the states.

But if you've watched enough of it, Dark Glasses fits right in with say Knife of Ice, or the Killer Reserved Nine Seats.

Is it Argento's finest hour? If you expected an 82-year-old man to make a film partially funded by the Italian public broadcasting system and with only an hour and 25 minutes to work with that would top Suspiria...... I just don't know what to tell you.

If you wanted to watch a master filmmaker make a relatively safe and standard enjoyable Giallo film, this has got you covered.

Not even watchble. I think Dario Argento should stop to make this rubbish.

Framing is even worst than his old movies, and also old in stile Dialogues are not even close to be acceptable. A teen can write better.

Actors ...no way...

No comments.

I was totally expecting to be let down, to the point that I almost didn't watch this. I'm glad I did. While it's never going to be mentioned in the same sentence as the classics from his prime, Dark Glasses is quite good. Most of Argento's hallmarks are there: Some graphic violence, a smidge of gratuitous nudity, dream logic craziness (water snake attack!) and something which is not an Argento hallmark; actual character development. What it lacks, unfortunately, are those insane Argento camera angles. A legitimate gripe but, not unforgivable. The last film Argento made that was remotely watchable was Mother of Tears. Dark Glasses is substantially better. If, at 82 years old, this is Argento's last film, it's not a bad note to go out on at all. 8 out of 10. Recommended.

I'm a Indian & admire Dario Argento's earlier works which were flag beares for gialo films. The latest addition of the master of horror get some of it right but the plot seems very thin. The colour grading is all good & makes it's atmospheric but story has many plot holes. The killer does not seems to facinate the audience & the face reveal is done quiet early for the story. The acting seems to be quiet ridiculous to me me even though the main lead has an artistic body to display. The movie is a small budget movie & is quite evident from the beginning. The movie ain't that bad, give it a watch without any expectations & you'll enjoy it.

As an Italian, as a horror fan and as a Dario Argento fan of the early years I say that I am baffled, this film is aberrant, perhaps one of the director's worst (I have not seen, Dracula 3d, the five days and you like hitchcock), the plot makes no sense, the direction and photography are worse than those of a soap opera, the cast is embarrassing, above all the always bad, hateful (even in real life) and pathetic Asia Argento, Ilenia Pastorelli is a good actress, I loved her in They call me Jeeg, but unfortunately she fails to emerge, everything lines up against her, a stupid and involuntarily comic story, my god the killer motive is something ridiculous ..... I can say with certainty that Argento is a bluff, he has been bluffing for 20 years and he absolutely has to withdraw and I find it absurd that this film has an average of 5, it is too high an average, this film deserves a 2 as a rating.

Did not get the reason for a master like Dario to get in such a no sense movie. No plot, terrible acting, low quality music, irrealistic and casual events. Why such an artistic suicide???

We all know that Argento's later films have been a let down in comparison to his earlier work, apart from Non Ho Sonno which I think is a great film on par with his work in the 70s and 80s and certainly a wonderful riff on some of his greater hits ... You need to go into this without comparing its style and structure to his early days ... Its a totally different beast ... I think Asia was very good in it and so is Ilenia Pastorelli ... The film is definitely WtF at times ... But that what we love about Argento ... Were those snakes ? ... Or eels ? ... Bloody weird anyway : )) ... I enjoyed it and will watch it again as I'm bound to have missed stuff ... This is a lot better than some of the dismal failures that have flopped out over the last couple of plague ridden years and cost the income of a small country to produce and still been so bad you can't even sit through them ... So thank you Dario.

Music - awesome. Photography - decent.

Everything else - lame.

Still better then Argento's Dracula, though.

All in all - for diehard Argento fans only.