Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuCovers the short period the two master painters spent as roommates in Van Goghs house and tensions and personality conflicts that ensued.Covers the short period the two master painters spent as roommates in Van Goghs house and tensions and personality conflicts that ensued.Covers the short period the two master painters spent as roommates in Van Goghs house and tensions and personality conflicts that ensued.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
It is the autumn of 1888 and artist Paul Gauguin has finally agreed to come to stay in the four rooms rented by Vincent Van Gogh in his yellow house in the countryside. The aim is to build an artists retreat together where they can create and express themselves freely. However as the pair become closer they also disagree over the nature of the artistic process, disagreements which gradually become more and more aggressive, damaging their relationship.
I will resist the urge to make a joke based on the presence of John Simm (is Van Gogh mad? In a coma? Or back in time?) but instead focus on the content of this film. The story will be familiar to many viewers even with a passing knowledge of art history if only because of the final, violent event of the time they spent together. The script expands on this well and creates characters that are interesting while still existing within the context of the story. Although it is basic this is enough to hold the interest as the characters are not too deep but not too simplistic in their actions. Durlacher's direction is good despite the fact that he is clearly working with a fairly limited budget.
The two male leads are more than up to the solid script. Simm enjoys himself away from Life on Mars and gives an impressively turbulent performance that spills out over the edges. He doesn't really get to the heart of his character but he lives up to the script well. I want to say that Lynch is not as good as Simm but I only felt this because he had a less engaging character. If anything the fact that Lynch does so well with the difficult and unattractive character given to Gauguin shows that he has done a better job. They work well together although the script does rather limit them in what they can do because it isn't ever really a subtle affair.
Overall then a solid film that delivers an interesting story with two good performances to the fore. It isn't as clever as I would have liked and it doesn't really delve much below the surface of events and characters but it is engaging enough to be worth a look once.
I will resist the urge to make a joke based on the presence of John Simm (is Van Gogh mad? In a coma? Or back in time?) but instead focus on the content of this film. The story will be familiar to many viewers even with a passing knowledge of art history if only because of the final, violent event of the time they spent together. The script expands on this well and creates characters that are interesting while still existing within the context of the story. Although it is basic this is enough to hold the interest as the characters are not too deep but not too simplistic in their actions. Durlacher's direction is good despite the fact that he is clearly working with a fairly limited budget.
The two male leads are more than up to the solid script. Simm enjoys himself away from Life on Mars and gives an impressively turbulent performance that spills out over the edges. He doesn't really get to the heart of his character but he lives up to the script well. I want to say that Lynch is not as good as Simm but I only felt this because he had a less engaging character. If anything the fact that Lynch does so well with the difficult and unattractive character given to Gauguin shows that he has done a better job. They work well together although the script does rather limit them in what they can do because it isn't ever really a subtle affair.
Overall then a solid film that delivers an interesting story with two good performances to the fore. It isn't as clever as I would have liked and it doesn't really delve much below the surface of events and characters but it is engaging enough to be worth a look once.
10patsvr
...I have ever watched! EVER!! Don't even think about watching this movie before you go to bed...especially, if you live alone. Guaranteed to have you hearing bumps & noises, not natural, to a house. Don't worry about nightmares...you won't be able to sleep. I can't believe I've never heard of this movie until just recently. It definitely starts out a little slow, but believe me, the reward is worth the wait. I don't want to spoil any of the shock scenes, so you'll just have to trust me. Exorcist, shmexorcist...this will have you ready to vomit or maybe even faint.
Don't say you haven't been warned!
Don't say you haven't been warned!
This film has already had some good, accurate and concise reviews. It is well written, well acted and well filmed. The research that has gone into it seems considerable, and then used in an intelligent way to produce a piece of drama, rather than a dull documentary. Whilst some of VG's works are dismissed in what appears to be a clichéd manner, ("childish"), this is a point that has to be made.
The film also reminds us of just how much work VG produced in such a short space of time - indeed, what we now we regard as some of his finest.
I'd suggest that some of the films finest moments pass almost without us realising the true meaning of the very carefully chosen dialogue.
In particular the line "It was you - you made me do it" after a scene of destruction will resonate with anyone who has ever worked with anyone with mental health problems, and contains enough different meanings to write a book about.
This work is a fine attempt to explain the unexplainable, whilst at the same time holding it's audience.
The film also reminds us of just how much work VG produced in such a short space of time - indeed, what we now we regard as some of his finest.
I'd suggest that some of the films finest moments pass almost without us realising the true meaning of the very carefully chosen dialogue.
In particular the line "It was you - you made me do it" after a scene of destruction will resonate with anyone who has ever worked with anyone with mental health problems, and contains enough different meanings to write a book about.
This work is a fine attempt to explain the unexplainable, whilst at the same time holding it's audience.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- A sárga ház
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 13 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen