[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
Zurück
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
IMDbPro
Scarecrow Gone Wild (2004)

Benutzerrezensionen

Scarecrow Gone Wild

45 Bewertungen
2/10

Watch. Laugh. Cry.

Wow! Here comes another straight-to-video scarecrow movie to keep the cinematic masochists happy. If the cheap-looking opening credits don't tell you you're in for quite a ride, then the diabolically tragic "writing" sure will.

A diabetic kid gets tied on to a legendary scarecrow as part of his initiation onto the baseball team. Then the scarecrow goes nuts and starts offing people. Need I say more? This movie consists greatly of cheap effects that makes it look like it was edited with iMovie (note that spooky color inversion) and actors who apparently weren't good enough to show up on some late-night Cinemax special. Actually, thats not fair, as the actors didn't have much room to work around the abysmal script. Parts of this movie really seem like parody, especially when one character picks up his guitar and starts playing the worst song ever conceived by humans, with the worst lip-synching ever performed to go along with it. The "gore" here is also a major disappointment. In most B-movies such as this, there is a thick layer of cheap gore FX to make up for what the story and acting lacks. Here, the stuff is so cheap that it's not even fun. This movie actually makes "Jack Frost 2" look like lots of fun in comparison.

If you think this movie is the "worst one you've ever seen" then you probably haven't gotten deep into the world of straight-to-video B-horror. Regardless, this movie will cause you a great deal of mental anguish, no matter what your background.
  • SpansonCrackle24
  • 8. Sept. 2005
  • Permalink
4/10

ridiculous

I supposed 'Scarecrow Gone Wild' is a dull slasher flick. Yes, it have some good point, but it's a rehash from another flick. The acts is so awful nor the plot.

The story goes from a legend about a living scarecrow on the cornfield. When an initiation become a prank and cause the life a boy in jeopardy, the scarecrow comes alive and start a killing frenzy. Sound familiar, right? It's derived from Scream, Friday the13th, Jeepeer Creepers, Children of the Corn, you name it!

'Scarecrow Gone Wild' is so below average film. Barely have a scary moment. Even the final scene is laughable! Sadly, we still could enjoy it as our time killer. But I prefer you to watch something else instead. Unless you're a big fan bad and cheesy movies, off course.

4/10
  • gila_film
  • 14. Okt. 2004
  • Permalink

What's up with all these scarecrow movies?

The spirit of a comatose hazing victim inhabits a scarecrow and takes revenge on his tormentors. First question: What's up with all these scarecrow movies? I think I missed the beginning of the trend. Are they all inspired by the opening sequence of 'Jeepers Creepers 2'? Sadly, none of the ones I have pulled down from the shelves of my local Blockbuster have lived up that sequence. This one, however, seemed to start well. The opening sequence, where a young woman is stalked in the cornfield by the scarecrow works reasonably well. It is helped by the fact that the scarecrow is only seen sparingly. When used sparingly, the scarecrow makeup works well, but, as a result of overuse, it begins to look like a cheap mask. It looked as fake as the breasts of the woman who plays the nurse. Gratuitous nudity aside, this film has little to compliment. I was inclined to praise the video photography until I watched the 'making of' documentary that revealed it was shot on film. For video it looked good. For film it sucked. The performances were both overwrought and overripe. Granted, there really wasn't much actors could do with the script. It was stupid. The overheated relationships were never believable. Still, it might've worked on the most visceral level if the film was scary, but it wasn't. One of the things that hurt it was a whistling theme that revealed the presence of the scarecrow. At first I thought the theme existed only on the soundtrack, but later characters in the film started hearing it. I found it funny, and I would start snickering every time I heard it, which effectively undermined all the thrills. This might not be the worst horror film out there, but it does lurk dangerously near the bottom of the barrel.
  • moviemanic07
  • 1. Okt. 2004
  • Permalink
5/10

Awful? Absolutely. Campy fun? Absolutely.

  • jimbob121686
  • 30. Okt. 2005
  • Permalink
5/10

Typical B Movie Horror

This is a typical direct to video horror movie, with the exception of Samantha Aisling, the acting is pretty bad (especially Ken Shamrock). I thought Samantha Aisling was very attractive and a pretty good actor, especially considering that according to IMDb this is her only film. Hopefully we'll be seeing a lot more of her in the near future. This isn't a horrible movie, but I don't think anyone renting this should be expecting award winning movie making. If you go realizing it is a low budget horror movie it's pretty good. I thought the special effects were pretty good, the scarecrow looks fairly scary as long as they don't show close-ups of it. When they show close-ups it looks like what it is... I guy in a Halloween mask. One of the things I did like about it was that, in most every horror movie, the monster waits until each person is alone then kills them one by one. The scarecrow actually attacks them as a group, nothing really special, just something different. I liked it, it's good for a minor scares and a couple of laughs. I gave it a 5/10
  • Eagles409
  • 30. Okt. 2004
  • Permalink
1/10

No Words Can Describe! Very awful film!

  • reilly_902
  • 10. Juli 2004
  • Permalink
1/10

I've finally found a movie that I thought was worse than Napoleon Dynamite

My roommate and I have another friend that works at a local Blockbuster Video. He finds truly awful movies for us and tells us about them. One of them was a "Christmas Horror" film starring former professional wrestler Bill Goldberg as a killer Satna Claus. We didn't watch it immediately, but we didn't think there could be anything worse. Apparently, we were wrong. We were shown this slasher film "starring" Ken Shamrock versus a murderous scarecrow. At first we thought Ken would actually BE the killer scarecrow, and that's why we wanted to watch, but he wasn't, and that made the movie even worse. What absolutely RUINED the movie was the teen drama. If you want to save your brain cells from trying to escape from your head, NEVER EVER WATCH THIS MOVIE.
  • WeezeL365
  • 17. Mai 2006
  • Permalink
5/10

Stylish, low budget, old fashioned "creature feature"

Clearly, the film makers had NO budget to make this movie... but it still works... It reminded me of all those creature feature old fashioned monster movies I saw on TV as a kid. Not much blood or gore compared to modern horror flicks, but plenty of hot girls, freaky moments and a definite wink-wink factor. The tongue is planted firmly in cheek when a character breaks out into song, 1960's Beach Blanket Bingo style, only to get gored moments later when the Scarecrow makes the point that he doesn't like modern music. Come on... it features an evil homicidal SCARECROW! What did you expect. Definitely the best in the Scarecrow series.
  • Telemachos
  • 11. Juni 2004
  • Permalink
3/10

Scarecrow Gone Wild

  • Scarecrow-88
  • 11. Juli 2007
  • Permalink
4/10

He's the Death of the Party!

  • Lawyergurl64
  • 4. Juni 2007
  • Permalink
10/10

The perfect make-out movie

Two words - GAS FREAKIN' CAN TO THE FACE When that kid got laid out I was certain that this was the best movie since Starship Troopers. In all seriousness, this movie should've been called Gas Can Gone Wild. It's a real shame they didn't peg more kids from the inside of their SUV. Imagine if the Scarecrow got 'canned while he was fighting Ken "Ken Shamrock" Shamrock in deadly hand-to-hand UFC combat.

This movie changed my life. I've taken to hazing diabetic kids in cornfields almost weekly since seeing this great film.

The Scarcrow is like Jason, but worse. But like good worse, like when being badder would be better.
  • jhbrad
  • 8. Aug. 2005
  • Permalink
6/10

Things I have learned from SGW

The things I have learned from this movie are remarkable, things I never would have guessed otherwise. I do warn you though, there are spoilers.

1) Spring Break doesn't consist of many people on a beach, but instead a small group friends...

2) Daylight is a tricky thing and can disappear to night, then dawn, then night again within a period of five minutes.

3) Scarecrows can whistle.

4) Scarecrows can whistle under water.

5) Scarecrows can drive trucks.

6) Boom mikes are not obviously visible while shooting or editing, but very visible when watching the movie.

7) Mirrors don't show your outer appearance, but instead what you are on the inside.

8) Scarecrows are weak against defibrillators.

9) Scarecrows lose track of people very easily on an open beach.

10) A wrestler is no match for the mighty power of a scarecrow.

11) Being lightly slapped can knock you unconscious.

12) Drunk people like terrible guitar solos.

13) When a spear-like object stabs through someone, it sticks through them at a completely different angle.

14) If you are being dragged along a beach, screaming for help, no one will help you, despite there being two people on the same side of the beach as you.(Check the background beach around when the girl finds her dead boyfriend, where could those two people go to in a matter of minutes?)

15) When you spill your innards, they rest neatly on top of your skin.

16) Finally, people don't show any signs of worry when their friends disappear for many hours without explanation.

This movie is very informative, I hope you have learned something from it. So Yeah.
  • DarkYoshi13
  • 4. Jan. 2006
  • Permalink
1/10

Unacceptable mistakes

I knew I was in for a LONG 90 minutes when the opening voice over mispronounced the word 'scarecrow' (it sounded like Scare Crew). And sure enough 90 minutes later, after witnessing beyond horrid acting, tedious drama, scarecrow's punches going nowhere near their intended target, but "hitting" it anyway, Ken Shamrock "acting", and the most stupid illogical ending, I've seen in my life (Ok, no, I take that last one back, in about a week). After making it through all that, I openly weeped that I couldn't just go to Lacuna a la Jim Carrey and just erase it completely from my mind. Any thoughts I might have had that Director Brian Katkin might have made an OK film given the right circumstances that I had after watching "Slaughter Studios", are totally and completely gone from my mind now.

My Grade: F

Eye Candy: Tara Platt and Lisa Robert get topless

Where I saw it: Starz on Demand (available until September 22nd, 2005)
  • movieman_kev
  • 29. Aug. 2005
  • Permalink

The perils of the undomesticated scarecrow

If I'd only known that this was the third in a series when I picked it up, I might have held back until I'd had the chance to study the first two instalments in some depth and subsequently come into Scarecrow Gone Wild fully prepared to appreciate all it had to offer. You'd think I'd have learned my lesson from the whole Kickboxer 4 farce (who is this feckless boy-child? Where's Jean-Claude? Why is Tong Po half his previous size?) - but no. Ah well, not to worry - at the end of the day I can safely say its charms weren't entirely lost on me.

In spite of several dull stretches as the film tries to make the lives of its mouth-breathing teenage sickle-fodder seem deep and involving, SGW is ultimately brimming over with so many top-quality "what the..." moments that it's impossible not to have fun with the damn thing. The Scarecrow drives! The Scarecrow hits the waves! The Scarecrow inexplicably gains the power of electrocution! The Scarecrow's head appears to be made of cast iron when someone clouts him with a fire extinguisher! It's all good stuff. And I'd never even heard of Ken Shamrock before this, but now I think he should be in every film ever made (alongside Christopher Lambert and Steven Seagal).

What's particularly endearing about Scarecrow Gone Wild is that everybody involved plays it as if they've been told it's some kind of intense art-house drama, although we do get the occasional flash of momentary self-awareness (the "watch out for the homicidal scarecrow" line near the end comes to mind). All in all, definitely one to remember, and roll on 10,001 Scarecrows... I think.
  • Leigh L.
  • 8. Juni 2005
  • Permalink
1/10

What not to view after just finishing a good movie.

  • eman45985-1
  • 18. Juli 2006
  • Permalink
2/10

And there's nothing on telly...........

So unfortunately me and my mate watched this!!! It was showing on a Sky channel over here called "Zone Horror" which basically shows crappy B-movie horror films 24/7. It was a boring Friday night, so decided to have a laugh and give this one a look. Apart from the atrocious acting, the awful plot, the dire effects, the shoddy camera work and the brain numbing ridiculousness of it all, it was OK, LOL!!! In all seriousness it was quite a laugh picking holes in it and laughing at the goofy actors. There is a bit of semi-nudity which perked the movie up a bit, unfortunately it was the "uggo" who got topless as my mate calls her :oD If you're bored one evening and this happens to be playing, take a chance, you just might like it :)
  • bennodale
  • 13. Apr. 2007
  • Permalink
3/10

"There's a homicidal scarecrow out there." Pretty bad low budget horror nonsense.

  • poolandrews
  • 11. Feb. 2007
  • Permalink
3/10

Dumb but fairly amusing nonsense

This is seemingly the third instalment of the 'Scarecrow' franchise. It's about a supernatural scarecrow killer who is re-animated as the result of a practical joke that goes horribly wrong. A boy is tied to a scarecrow in a corn-field by some bullies. He goes into a coma through shock and via his comatose state the scarecrow is able to possess him and kill the teenagers who tormented him. It's a story that vaguely makes sense but in fairness what can you really expect from a film called Scarecrow Gone Wild?

It's very much a cheap and cheerful slasher movie aimed at the teen market. It doesn't take itself very seriously though, with some very silly scenes sprinkled throughout and some classic bad dialogue. Probably my favourite moment was when one teen decides to play one of his songs to the others on the beach one night. It's a suitably appalling ditty and it's ended by our friend the scarecrow pitching up and impaling him with the stand of a beach volleyball net. The film is pretty much a mix of horror, overwrought teen melodrama and dumb humour. While it's far from being good, it does have a certain goofy entertainment value for the most part.
  • Red-Barracuda
  • 21. Juli 2013
  • Permalink
1/10

Ouch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • icechalkhands
  • 9. Mai 2005
  • Permalink
1/10

Don't be fooled by the title

  • metalrage666
  • 6. Sept. 2017
  • Permalink
2/10

Terrible

  • Horrorible_Horror_Films
  • 22. Aug. 2006
  • Permalink
8/10

A hilariously ridiculous cheesy hoot

  • Woodyanders
  • 20. Juni 2007
  • Permalink
7/10

What a no-budget horror film should be.

First off, I love slasher-type films. No matter how cheesy as long as they stick to the formula I'm happy. That includes some gore and some T&A.

This is a no-budget films that tries. Sure it could have been a lot better if they actually had some money, but they did good with what they had.

The story was typical, the dialog not too bad, and the acting was pretty good. I could have done without the fisheye lens and solarization effect which tend to highlight the lack of production money, but the film survived them.

The gore was pretty cheesy most of the time, but they made a valiant effort, and not-that-great gore is better than no gore. The film also had a nice helping of T&A for sleaze-hounds like me. Kudos especially to Tara Platt and Lisa Robert for being troopers and doing what it takes.

If you like low budget 80's slasher then you will probably dig this.
  • mvario
  • 30. Apr. 2005
  • Permalink
1/10

Horrible

  • chriss_anders
  • 17. Mai 2006
  • Permalink

Mehr von diesem Titel

Mehr entdecken

Zuletzt angesehen

Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
Hol dir die IMDb-App
Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
Hol dir die IMDb-App
Für Android und iOS
Hol dir die IMDb-App
  • Hilfe
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
  • Pressezimmer
  • Werbung
  • Jobs
  • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
  • Datenschutzrichtlinie
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.