Maqbool - Der Pate von Mumbai

Fascinating movie. A perfect adaptation. Since I saw the Indian adaptation before the Scottish original; it actually made me appreciate how seamlessly the story has been adapted. Pankaj Kapur as Abbaji is sensational. Note his expression when he is stopped and told that the cops are waiting for him after his arrest warrant is issued. He controls his anger and sense of injustice with humor. A classic moment. Also his revenge in the police station is well written. Full marks to Vishal for the screenplay. The casting is superb and the best example of getting a consolidated cast absolutely right. Irfaan as Mia gives a steady performance but this helps the surrounding cast to shine. Tabu is first rate. So is Om Puri. And watch for the characterization of Abbaji's silent right hand man. His devotion to Abbaji and then to Allah (watch his movements first to the song being played at Eid and then when he is asked to consume alcohol) comes across very real. As real as it gets . I am a big fan of this movie and VB to me is a sensational directorial find.

This film is, in short, a masterpiece. A unique interpretation on Shakespeare's "Macbeth", "Maqbool" features Irrfan in one of the most brilliantly executed roles of modern cinema. He remarkably inhabits the skin of a character who is muddled, murderous, and maniacal. Pankaj Kapoor, as the invincible Abbaji, is astonishing in his portrayal of the Muslim Mob Boss. Truly an incomparable performance. As for Tabu, she is PERFECTION. This is not Shakespeare's Lady Macbeth- she is equally fierce, but given a softer and more shadowy countenance. Tabu is officially a text book of acting (take note, screen queens Rani, Preity, Aish, Madhuri, and the rest- this is what a REAL actress can do). Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri give expert portrayals. Kudos to Bhardwaj for creating a film which is not only unconventional, but eerily radiant. Ram Gopal Verma and Mani Ratnam now have company as India's most innovative filmmakers.

Yes!yes! that it is.The film came as a fresh breeze of air when Hindi cinema is experimenting with all sort of stuff.With probably one of the greatest star cast in the world ; the film is worth spending a premium.People who neglect the role of Hindi cinema in world entertainment or who don't like Hindi cinema at all should look at this film.The plot goes as follows Abbaji ( Pankaj Kapoor ) the underworld kingpin of Mumbai has two faithfuls helping him in his business Maqbool ( Irfan Khan )and Kaka ( Piyush Mishra ).Nimmi ( Tabu ) Abbaji's younger wife loves Maqbool and wants him to take the place of aging Abbaji.One day on Abbaji's daughter Sammera's ( Mausami ) wedding to Kaka's son Guddu ( Ajay Gehi ) Maqbool and Nimmi secretly kill Abbaji.The throne of Abbaji is open whom Maqbool is intent on occupying with hook or crook.The two inspectors Purohit ( Nasseruddin Shah ) and Pandit ( Om Puri ) serve as bribed workers to this family. All an all a powerful five star.Hats up ! to Vishal Bhardwaj who won accolades from Karan Johar , Aamir Khan and Hrithik Roshan for this film.

Irfan shines and shines. Tabu, Pankaj Kapoor are excellent, as are Naseerudin and Om Puri, but when Maqbool (Irfan) is on screen, he overshadows all. Yes even Pankaj (one of the finest actors of India). Vishal Bharadwaj has made an excellent adaptation. Why, oh why doesn't someone drag Sanjay Leela Bhansali to see this film. Anyone who has seen Irfan in 'The Warrior" or Haasil will certify that Irfan's utterly unconventional looks acts as a force multiplier, rather than a drag. He is a great talent, and Indian filmmakers would do well to use him much more than he is being used. Another victory for Bobby Bedi, one wonders why everyone in the industry seems to hate the man. He has already given us Bandit Queen and Maqbool. What more does a man have to do? Oh that's right, "Indian public wants films like Black and KKKG" (actual quote by a BB basher). Another word on Tabu, why don't more filmmakers give her real roles. But not Bhandarkar please. Page 3 has destroyed all faith in him.

I'll say this much, no one could possibly accuse filmmaker Vishal Bhardwaj and co-writer Abbas Tyrewala of not being ambitious and daring. In one fell swoop they endeavored to tell an Indian story with some portion of the recognizable framework of a classic of English literature, and to shape the very familiar characters, scene writing, and plot of that classic of English literature into a discretely Indian film. Any filmmaker who seeks to adapt William Shakespeare faces the challenge of establishing their own unique vision while retaining the core substance of the source material; Bhardwaj and Tyrewala gave themselves an even greater challenge in transplanting the tale to a completely different setting - geographically, temporally, culturally - and necessarily altering the characters and dialogue, and in turn the scenes and narrative, in a manner that's sensible for the new rendition. The essence of 'Macbeth' remains in a saga of prophecy, ambition, conspiracy, and murder, but now in the criminal underworld of Mumbai rather than the heaths of Scotland. Can the result be satisfying for both fans of Indian cinema, and fans of The Bard? I think the answer is "yes," overall, but mileage will vary significantly from one viewer to the next, and to be honest, in some important ways 'Maqbool' is a rather rough ride.

No matter one's frame of reference I think there are definite, distinct issues that place major upper limits on what the movie could have been. The idea of changing the comings and goings and fates of characters from how they present in the Scottish play is not at issue; this is the nature of adaptation. However, independent of any consideration of inspiration or context, I think the screenplay is deeply troubled in fundamental ways. Too much of the scene writing, characterizations, overall plot, and plot development feel direly scattered, unfocused, and confused. Relationships between characters are meagerly established, and it's often hard to get a beat on who they are supposed to be to one another, or even in the grand scheme of the story (including even this film's Lord and Lady Macbeth, Miyan and Nimmi); the thrust of the narrative seems to shift wildly and unpredictably, with little to no cohesiveness or coherence, and I begin to wonder if the pieces of the puzzle truly even fit together; plot development is so sideways, and pacing so limp, that by the time half the length has elapsed it doesn't really feel that the tale has meaningfully progressed from where it began. If we then stop to consider all this in comparison to any other cinematic interpretation of the play from which Bhardwaj and Tyrewala drew influence, one can't help but be confounded.

'Maqbool' is well made in other regards, certainly. I love the music, both the original score and the specific songs that dot the length; the choreography is fantastic. The filming locations and art direction are equally lovely, not to mention the costume design, hair, and makeup. I don't necessarily agree that every choice here of editing or cinematography were the best ones, but I appreciate Aarif Sheikh and Hemant Chaturvedi's contributions nonetheless, as well as the stunts and effects that are employed. There is scarcely any more a one-to-one comportment between the performances, and the major scenes for actors, than there is between the narrative at large and 'Macbeth,' but still I don't think there's any arguing that the acting is strong, with Irrfan and Tabu naturally standing out in the chief roles - and they are hardly alone. Troubled as I believe the writing to be, I find no particular fault in Bhardwaj's direction as he ties all the various parts together. Truthfully, I think in total the title is surely better than not, and enjoyable; as much as I had my doubts, the narrative does gel more cogently in the second half, with the outcome of being compelling and satisfying. It's just so unfortunate that the writing is so messy in the first place, for if as much care had been applied to the storytelling as had been to every other facet, the finished product would have only benefited. As it stands, the favor we may bestow is heavily restricted after a point.

All told I do like this, and I think it's worth watching, on its own merits and whatever one's impetus. Why, there are even some bits and pieces here, Bhardwaj and Tyrewala's own takes on some critical story ideas, that are kind of brilliant. It also struggles with notable weaknesses, however, and all the most severe of these stem strictly from the writing that desperately needed to be tightened. For as incredibly well done as the film is at its best I want to like it more than I do; for the problems that hound it for far too much of the length, maybe I'm being too kind. One way or another 'Maqbool' stands solidly on its own legs, and I'm pleased to give it a recommendation; would that the skill and intelligence this demonstrates in its best moments had been more evenly administered all around so that I could speak of the flick with more enthusiasm.