Lunatics - Duell der Alpträume

In L. A., agoraphobic Hank Stone (Ted Raimi) has not left his apartment since moving in six months ago. He has disturbing delusions about brain spiders, a mad doctor, bad rappers, and other stuff. Nancy (Deborah Foreman) thinks that she's cursed. She gets dumped by her cruel boyfriend Ray (Bruce Campbell) and loses her hotel room. She gets chased by a gang of street thugs. A random phone call brings the two loners together.

It takes almost forty minutes to bring the two leads together. It takes too long to get going. Quite frankly, I wonder if this would be better as her story over a crazy night. He could be a part of her crazy night. 80's star Deborah Foreman faded out as she advanced into her 30's. It's an old Hollywood story. This low budget B-movie is reason enough for her to start thinking about retiring. It's not that good. Hank's surreal delusions aren't compelling or funny enough. I keep thinking about the rappers. Only weak comedies think that those guys are funny. The movie seems more interested in its b-level special effects. It needs better humor or better romantic chemistry. It needs something better.

LUNATICS: A LOVE STORY stars Ted Raimi as Hank, a man who is a veritable prisoner in his tiny apartment. Hank is a bit... unstable. His entire life is pretty much one big hallucinatory nightmare. Hank also writes poetry.

Enter Nancy (Deborah Foreman), a young woman who believes her life is cursed. She just might be right. Nancy's also handy with a gun. Oh, and she writes poetry too.

Will these two kids be drawn together by the hand -or foot- of destiny? You betcha!

If you're tired of cookie-cutter, melodramatic love stories, then you should get a kick out of this insane rendition thereof. It's utterly bonkers, and yet it has a romantic heart -and liver- that can't be denied.

Both Mr. Raimi and Ms. Foreman are hilariously deranged. Bruce Campbell is along for the ride as Nancy's jerkweed boyfriend, as well as a mad brain surgeon, annnd Edgar Alan Poe on a book cover!

Watch this right now, but don't forget the aluminum foil...

Deborah Foreman has been dumped on the street by her boyfriend; she's a jinx. As she is about to be assaulted by a street gang, the telephone rings, and it's Ted Raimi, trying to call a help line; he hasn't left his apartment for six months because of his natural fear of giant spiders, extra-terrestrials, mad doctors, and of course, rappers. He invites her over, but the street gag is blocking her, so he puts on his superhero costume and sallies forth.

Josh Becker's movie is quite a clever little romantic comedy, that satirizes.... well, to be honest, I'm not sure what. Is Miss Foreman a jinx? Is Raimi insane? Apart from his delusions, I mean, and do their delusions include love at first sight? And just because you think the mad doctors are out there -- and the film maker cooperates by showing them to the audience -- what's a crippling insanity? It's a question that afflicts us currently, not just personally, but politically.

In any case, the performances are good, the camera work watchable, and I had a good time.

Well, if this movie is the "epitome of Sam Raimi films", it's some kind of weird coincidence, because this is not a Sam Raimi film.

Moving on, this movie is probably really only worth watching if you're a hardcore fan of someone who's in it. I saw it for Bruce Campbell. Frankly, there aren't really any redeeming qualities. The actors all do decent jobs with what they're given, but the movie just feels really dull and empty, like it doesn't really warrant a whole movie. It also reeks pretty badly of the early '90s, which is either a reason to watch or avoid, depending on who you are. At any rate, unless your local rental store is pretty amazing, you'll probably be hard-pressed to find this movie save by spending upwards of 70 dollars to buy it online. It's definitely not worth the 70 dollars. Bruce Campbell doesn't really even get to do anything particularly Bruce Campbell-ish. No snappy one-liners or anything.

Anyway, if by any chance your girlfriend buys you this movie for your birthday, you might as well watch it since it came your way. Also watch out for the whole differing religions thing, it might be a problem in another three months.

"Xena" star Ted Raimi (Sam's brother) plays Hank Stone, a formerly institutionalized mental case who (when off his medication) suffers from rather nasty hallucinations and has a phobia that he will be attacked if he ventures outside his apartment. Sort of "Repulsion" (1966) meets "The Secret Lives of Dentists" (2002). It is titled a romance and is inaccurately billed as a comedy.

When he is not dealing with the imaginary spiders creeping around it his brain, the rappers that appear when he plays music, the "hot" billboard girl who seduces him, and the mad doctors prodding him with needles; Hank finds the time to feel lonely and impulsively invites an unseen girl he has dialed on the phone to come up and see him sometime.

The girl turns out to be Nancy, a neurotic but squeaky-clean damsel in distress (she has p....d off a local street gang). Hank is extremely pleased when Nancy arrives (not surprising as she is played by Deborah Foreman-arguably the most beautiful of all the young Hollywood actresses of the 1980's). This was one of Foreman's last films, she wasn't getting quality stuff and had begun to fade a tiny bit physically; director Josh Becker unnecessarily compensates for this by limiting her extreme close-ups.

Hank and Nancy discover they share both an interest in poetry and a tendency to lash out violently at each other during moments of mental disturbance. But Hank's love for Nancy will inspire him to face his demons and venture into the world to save her.

Josh Becker wrote and directed the film, not Sam Raimi of "Evil Dead" fame. Raimi produced the film and Becker was one of his close associates, which may account for the confusion.

The low budget special effects are actually an asset as they give a unity to the expressionistic feel of the film; as does the wonky jazz score.

While some viewers really connect with this film, mainstream viewers will be either bored or irritated. Bored because this is a minimalist movie in which what little happens does so in an unconvincing manner and without a build-up of suspense or real tension.

Irritating because the story is structured wrong. It is supposed to be a romance yet the characters do not meet until minute 42 of the 87 minutes running length. They are only together on the screen for about 20% of the film. This also means that the story be told from two separate points of view, which distances the viewer and makes it necessary to expend a lot of energy achieving a strong identification with either character.

Nonetheless, there is a lot of originality here and the overall the viewing experience is a pleasant one.

Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.