IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,0/10
1053
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuJack London's brutal Wolf Larson brings a shipwrecked aristocrat and a con woman aboard his doomed ship, the Ghost.Jack London's brutal Wolf Larson brings a shipwrecked aristocrat and a con woman aboard his doomed ship, the Ghost.Jack London's brutal Wolf Larson brings a shipwrecked aristocrat and a con woman aboard his doomed ship, the Ghost.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Für 1 Primetime Emmy nominiert
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Russell Roberts
- French Frank
- (as Russell J. Roberts)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This movie does Jack London's sailing yarn Sea Wolf real justice for an average budget attempt.
One thing that strikes me is how far away we are from the history of the sea in our modern world, and how great London's writing really is in this story, weaving the rawest tenets of human struggle into what was then one of the primary economic engines of the world, the commerce of the ocean-going fishing, whaling, or here, sealing ship. Of course, the sea tale is such a romantic notion, ironic in that it was so tough to actually live, and offers a writer so much because the characters are all stuck together in a constant state of peril from without, and this magnifies the sense of the peril between them.
Reeve is brilliant as an educated man of position facing the rawest of worlds far from where he was raised. He runs into another intellectual of sorts, a captain who has scrambled from poverty to occupy a position of pure power, which he holds in purely Machiavellian ways. Reeve's true sensitivity comes out in the role, acting as foil to the pure cynicism of Bronson's Captain Larsen, begging for mercy for others and for good when possible. I kept being struck at how strong, virile, and yet kind and warm Reeve seemed in the role, and the strength he would need as his own life took such an awful turn not long after this movie.
Bronson also gets his licks in as a man who has seen empathy repaid with betrayal so many times, he sees empathy only as weakness and vulnerability, and considering his surroundings, he makes an excellent case. The story sets these two forces, two approaches to life against each other, and basically never resolves them, which is good, because a resolution would be too facile. Both men stick to who they are. There are times when Bronson seems less than on, but his previous persona lends itself well here, lending him the previous strength, but I can tell he approached the role in a different way than his other tough guy roles. He created a real weakness in the rigidity of this character and conveys a fairly broken man who still knows how to be a brutal and effective leader. He isn't a wisecracker, here though. He's a weakening man in a tough shell. Bronson is past his peak here, but still rivets the viewer, especially a fan. I would've pegged Bronson for 60 here, but he was 70 when he made this film.
THe supporting cast runs the gamut from great to average, with a couple given exceptional moment in London's story. I enjoyed seeing two actors 20+ years later, now both gone. They really were both great.
One thing that strikes me is how far away we are from the history of the sea in our modern world, and how great London's writing really is in this story, weaving the rawest tenets of human struggle into what was then one of the primary economic engines of the world, the commerce of the ocean-going fishing, whaling, or here, sealing ship. Of course, the sea tale is such a romantic notion, ironic in that it was so tough to actually live, and offers a writer so much because the characters are all stuck together in a constant state of peril from without, and this magnifies the sense of the peril between them.
Reeve is brilliant as an educated man of position facing the rawest of worlds far from where he was raised. He runs into another intellectual of sorts, a captain who has scrambled from poverty to occupy a position of pure power, which he holds in purely Machiavellian ways. Reeve's true sensitivity comes out in the role, acting as foil to the pure cynicism of Bronson's Captain Larsen, begging for mercy for others and for good when possible. I kept being struck at how strong, virile, and yet kind and warm Reeve seemed in the role, and the strength he would need as his own life took such an awful turn not long after this movie.
Bronson also gets his licks in as a man who has seen empathy repaid with betrayal so many times, he sees empathy only as weakness and vulnerability, and considering his surroundings, he makes an excellent case. The story sets these two forces, two approaches to life against each other, and basically never resolves them, which is good, because a resolution would be too facile. Both men stick to who they are. There are times when Bronson seems less than on, but his previous persona lends itself well here, lending him the previous strength, but I can tell he approached the role in a different way than his other tough guy roles. He created a real weakness in the rigidity of this character and conveys a fairly broken man who still knows how to be a brutal and effective leader. He isn't a wisecracker, here though. He's a weakening man in a tough shell. Bronson is past his peak here, but still rivets the viewer, especially a fan. I would've pegged Bronson for 60 here, but he was 70 when he made this film.
THe supporting cast runs the gamut from great to average, with a couple given exceptional moment in London's story. I enjoyed seeing two actors 20+ years later, now both gone. They really were both great.
I didn't really buy Charles Bronson as this brutal sea captain.He reminded me of a few people I know that have been through a lot in life but survived & because of it, it made them stronger & tougher.They act hard & mean but once you truly get to know them & they let you in, you find out they're actually nice people.He also reminded me of an old person/boss that is tough in front of people but behind closed doors, they're completely different.Maybe I'm too used of seeing him as a hero or vigilante that it's hard for me to believe him as a violent sea captain.This is also the 1st movie I've ever seen him cast as a villain.Anyways..... I never knew The Sea Wolf was based off a book but after watching this movie, 1 of these days I might check it out.I might check out the other versions of the movie someday as well.This version of The Sea Wolf was pretty decent especially for being a TV movie.I wouldn't tell somebody who's thinking of seeing it to skip it.It's good enough that it will keep you entertained while it's on but I don't think you'll give it a rewatch for another couple of months after.Watch it & stick around for the ending.It's worth it
I guess TNT had a little Christopher Reeve tribute this past weekend. Caught the end of "Superman 2" and then got sucked into this slightly better than average "tv movie." Good acting from Reeve and Marc "Beastmaster" singer. Bronson wasn't very believable though and his acting was as lousy as ever. All and all, not bad for a flick made for tv, but there's a reason it's just that -- "made for tv." The ending was particularly unnerving - seems that they said "hey we've only got 5 minutes left of tv time - let's wrap this up with 4 different plot points." I gave it a 7 of ten but more along the lines of 6 and a 3/4 (my ratings are like school grades 7= C) -- check it out if you're a Reeve fan, but Bronson is no Lex Luthor.
When I stumbled upon the 1993 TV movie "The Sea Wolf", by random chance here in 2024, and seeing that the movie had both Charles Bronson and Christopher Reeve on the cast list, of course I had to sit down and watch it. In fact, I didn't even know that the movie existed prior to finding it by pure luck.
And imagine my surprise when I saw that the movie also had Marc Singer, Garry Chalk and Catherine Mary Stewart on the cast list. That was just some sweet icing on he cake.
I had no expectations to the movie or to writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady, as I virtually had no idea what I was in for, as I sat down to watch "The Sea Wolf". So in a sense, the writers had every opportunity to impress and entertain me.
The storyline in "The Sea Wolf" was good, writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady put together an enjoyable and entertaining script. It was a storyline that had a nice progression to the narrative, and one that was laced with some nice elements of character development, storytelling, suspense and drama.
"The Sea Wolf" has a good and interesting character gallery, so writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady did manage to pen down some nicely detailed characters for the movie and aboard the Ghost.
The acting performances in the movie were good, and it was definitely nice to see the likes of Bronson and Reeve acting opposite one another, because they both put on good performances and brought a lot of flavor to the movie.
The movie is nicely directed by Michael Anderson and also nicely shot with great cinematography, which definitely made it feel like the audience were right there alongside the sailors aboard the Ghost.
While "The Sea Wolf" definitely is a good movie, it is hardly a movie that warrants a second viewing, as the contents of the script just doesn't have enough contents to support multiple viewings.
My rating of director Michael Anderson's 1993 movie "The Sea Wolf" lands on a six out of ten stars.
And imagine my surprise when I saw that the movie also had Marc Singer, Garry Chalk and Catherine Mary Stewart on the cast list. That was just some sweet icing on he cake.
I had no expectations to the movie or to writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady, as I virtually had no idea what I was in for, as I sat down to watch "The Sea Wolf". So in a sense, the writers had every opportunity to impress and entertain me.
The storyline in "The Sea Wolf" was good, writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady put together an enjoyable and entertaining script. It was a storyline that had a nice progression to the narrative, and one that was laced with some nice elements of character development, storytelling, suspense and drama.
"The Sea Wolf" has a good and interesting character gallery, so writers Jack London and Andrew J. Fenady did manage to pen down some nicely detailed characters for the movie and aboard the Ghost.
The acting performances in the movie were good, and it was definitely nice to see the likes of Bronson and Reeve acting opposite one another, because they both put on good performances and brought a lot of flavor to the movie.
The movie is nicely directed by Michael Anderson and also nicely shot with great cinematography, which definitely made it feel like the audience were right there alongside the sailors aboard the Ghost.
While "The Sea Wolf" definitely is a good movie, it is hardly a movie that warrants a second viewing, as the contents of the script just doesn't have enough contents to support multiple viewings.
My rating of director Michael Anderson's 1993 movie "The Sea Wolf" lands on a six out of ten stars.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesOne of the few times Charles Bronson played a villain since he became a top international star in the early 70's. He generally did not like playing villains and turned down many roles in his later years where he would play one.
- Zitate
Dr. Picard: There's not much I can do.
Capt. Wolf Larsen: You could sober up.
Dr. Picard: I'm afraid she's not going to survive.
Capt. Wolf Larsen: You say that about all your patients.
- VerbindungenEdited from Der Seewolf (1941)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Captain Larsen
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 30 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.33 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen