A Hora da Estrela

Unfortunately this is just good photography and decent acting. Nothing else you can see here... The dialogues are dull and the story takes you into a jorney to nowhere. It's just a waste of time.

If you've ever read Lispector's text, Amaral's film is a must-see. You may be wondering how Amaral could possibly manage to capture Lispector's musings on the act of writing or questions regarding representation as they are presented through her narrator, Rodrigo. Pay close attention, and you'll find your answer. Although Rodrigo is absent from the film, he is symbolically present via Amaral's juxtaposition of Macabea's humble life, and the reality that is presented to her within an industrialized society. I personally believe that this is not a representation of the original text, but an appropriation of certain underlying themes within it. As you will see, Amaral manages to give us her own perspective and cultural critique of representation via the artistic medium of which she is a part. In this sense, the film stands alone, independent of the novella, with a few strong threads tying the two together. For anyone who is interested in the question of representation within the cultural industry, commodity fetishism, capitalism, feminism, etc., you need to watch this film, and then you need to watch it again.

If you are in a bad mood or unquiet, don't try this one. There are several moments that you will think Macabea lives in a hell, and that she is too stupid to get out. But the movie is made to be analysed, and if you keep watching, you will fell it. Her relationship with Olimpico, and the antagonism of personalities, the perspective of Macabea about her life, opportunities and the future. Everything has a reason to be shown, every single word has a meaning. The movie was based on Clarice Lispector's best-seller "A Hora da Estrela" (The Star Time).

A depressing and well done film, very introspective, immersive, and psychological. Marcelia Cartaxo's work is quite impressive and she did deserve all the acknowledgement and prizes. Great José Dumont, Fernanda Montenegro as the fortuneteller, and Tamara Taxman also go very well in their supporting roles. Deceased in this very year 2020, Suzana Amaral might have directed more movies! Spectator does feel discomfort for the depreciated existance of the character Macabea. Therefore, the movie is very good and it is a skilful adaptation of a hard novel to transport to the screen. The single problem to be highlighted is not producers' fault, as it derives from the source: there is a disturbing prejudice by writer Clarice Lispector herself towards poor people who migrates from Northeast to São Paulo. It appears sharply in both narrow-minded ignorant macho sexism by Dumont's character Olímpico and, mainly, in Macabea's foolness and absolute lack of fitness, attractiveness, aspirations and even hygiene. It is not only an existentialist movie, but also a film about Brazilian culture, and that from the lens of a talented but also elitist novelist.

Hour of the Star (1985) is a straight forward look at life in poverty stricken Brazil. Away from the glitz and glamor of the popular traveler's paradise and away from the tourist traps. Life is hard and the outlook is very bleak for the poor working class of Brazil. But one young woman is determined to live life to the fullest. She dreams of a future that only exists in her mind. No matter what situations life dishes out, she remains oblivious to reality and remains in a fantasy world searching for a man who'll take her away from her life of poverty.

Brilliant film. I watched this one in college and I was amazed by the film-making and the strong storyline. I couldn't believe that people lived in such squalor (they make the ghettos look nice). People living on slave labor wages and doing everything they can to survive. I highly recommended this picture (if you can locate a copy).

Awesome film.

A