Titicut Follies

Others have summarized this documentary well, so I would like to add my comments rather than go over ground covered by others.

It is hard to view this film and watch the dehumanization and brutalization of these patients. They are shown naked being provoked into angry outbursts by the guards, force-fed, locked in solitary confinement naked with a metal bucket for a toilet and hundreds of other indignities. Even the fact that the film-makers had such access is a shocking violation since patients committed involuntarily are unable to give informed consent.

But this was made in 1967 before modern anti-psychotic medications were developed. As a Clinical Social Worker who has worked extensively with the chronic mentally ill over the last decade, I was shocked to see how primitive the treatment methods were, even though I was prepared by my research in graduate school. Tranquilizers were being prescribed to mitigate the symptoms of paranoia, the psychiatric interviews with patients included lots of leading questions and they were treated rudely and dismissively even when the patients were making some good points about their commitments.

It was obvious that the staff and volunteers were just doing the best they could, but I have less sympathy for the Hungarian psychiatrist who at times seemed as disturbed as his patients. The volunteers running games and parties and shows reminded me of the Friendly Visitors to the Poor, those well-intentioned 19th C. socialites who volunteered to sing hymns and read the Christian bible to poor people in the tenements to "improve" their lives.

All in all, this is a very worthwhile film and highly recommended to professionals and interested others in the mental health field. Yes, there are some definite ethical problems in the way this was created, but as a historical record it is invaluable. I give this 9/10.

Like Mr. Pierson, I find it strange to give this movie a "10" since it is not something to see for a good time.

When I saw this movie in 1972, I considered myself very lucky, since I was from Massachusetts, where it was banned, and saw it only because it was shown in my Psych class in college in New York State. We had a special showing for our class and (literally) were told not to eat before seeing the film.

There was quite a bit of controversy over it, and over Bridgewater in Massachusetts back then, somehow I just assumed that the film would be available and not banned by now. The ban only protected the state of Massachusetts, really, from being portrayed as a government that ran an prison for the criminally insane where people only went in, and never came out, where prisoners were mistreated, and where the craziest person in the place was the warden. Bridgewater was used as a threat to people at the Charles Street Jail to keep in line, it was considered like a death sentence. Massachusetts probably wasn't alone, I've heard that Napa was used as a threat to people in San Quentin back then as well.

How strange about it still being restricted, I hadn't thought of it in a long time and was actually researching hunger strikes when it crossed my mind. I wonder how Bridgewater in the '60s compares to anything now.

When someone asks me "What's the best documentary you've ever seen?" I find myself in a quandary. The best documentary I've ever seen is Titicut Follies, but for the life of me I couldn't recommend it. That's because this stark portrayal of the "treatment" of the insane at a Massachusetts state asylum is terrifyingly, horribly disturbing. The documentary reflects the horror of its subject matter. Once seen, it is unforgettable. I find it difficult to take responsibility for exposing another person to this film. And that is probably the highest compliment I can pay it.

Over a year ago, I talked about Let There Be Light, a film made by famed director John Huston that details the mental anguish patients of a mental hospital go through on a daily basis. The film documented World War II veterans, and most of them are traumatized because of their own terrible experiences, not because they were mistreated by the staff. Despite this, the film was considered so shocking that it wasn't released until 1980. Titicut Follies has a very similar premise, except here, I think the suffering is even more extreme. Titicut Follies is filmed at the Bridgewater Correctional Institution in Massachusetts, which resembles a real version of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. This is because not only are the patients depicted made to live in their own filth for days on end and forced to live in squalid conditions, but the medical staff show truly grotesque behavior towards them. Some scenes in this documentary are so awful I don't know if I can discuss them. One scene has a few guards escort a man (who used to be a math teacher) into a room in order to shave him. All the while, one of the guards keeps repeating that he can't hear whatever he was saying. He's only doing this to agitate and get a reaction out of him, since he seems to take great enjoyment in bothering him. Later, they take him to another room that has absolutely no furniture, toilet, or anything in it at all (except a window). I really don't get what the point of such a hellish place is, especially in a mental institution. It makes even a prison cell look pleasant. Another part has some guy doing what looks like squats in a similar room, while he screams at the top of his lungs. Probably the most egregious scene has guards taking someone out of his room since he refused to eat for 3 whole days. They lay him down and put a tube into his nose which extends all the way into his stomach. It shows how life in this place was so horrible, some people were willing to kill themselves to escape it, but the guards couldn't let them do that. While it's easy in retrospect to pin the blame for this kind of treatment on the ones running and staffing the facility, it's not entirely their fault. By the time this movie was made, they didn't have the types of medicine we now do. It's kind of like how lobotomies used to be seen as an effective way of curing those who were thought to be mentally incurable, but now, the lobotomy is understood to be a grossly barbaric procedure. Interspliced with all these disturbing things, there's clips of musical performances, mental patients playing games, and other bizzare spectacles. While I think this film is quite important because of what it represents, I'd be out of my mind to recommend it to anybody. Let's just say it's not the kind of thing you would watch for entertainment. I'm generally used to violent films and tv programs involving war, but many of the things shown in Titicut Follies are real sickening. It's also worth pointing out that because of this film, the authorities at Bridgewater have strove to do better and make more hospitable living conditions for the patients there, which may or may not mean anything. Overall, this movie is undeniably difficult to look at, but it is historically important because it woke people up and gave them a glimpse into how inhumane a lot of these places were. Wiseman lived up to his name when he decided to expose this place.

Fred Wiseman's documentary about the lives of inmates at a Massachusetts mental institution is a very disturbing film to watch. I dare anyone to watch this with out feeling at least a bit uneasy. Watching this film one can't help thinking if the "treatments" given to these poor lost souls actually worsens their condition. One articulate inmate argues the treatment and medication he is given are making him sick. He begs to be sent back to prison, rather than spend another day in this wretched institution. The doctors respond by claiming he has developed paranoia and orders his medication increased! The doctors come across as cruel and callous. They seem to regard the inmates as guinea pigs rather than patients to be treated. One doctor, who is shown constantly chain smoking, looks and sounds like a Nazi concentration camp doctor.

TITICUT FOLLIES is a very shocking film, I would only recommend it with caution to others.