IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,4/10
1462
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA saboteur posing as a scientist strives to destroy the world's first space station.A saboteur posing as a scientist strives to destroy the world's first space station.A saboteur posing as a scientist strives to destroy the world's first space station.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
If you want a good Sci Fi movie to watch, this probably isn't it. It's old and low budget. In particular the costumes look quite goofy. The players are also unknowns or near unknowns. However it's such an early space movie that it's historically fascinating.
The noted Sci Fi writer Richard Heinlein wrote the script. (He's more famous for Starship Troopers.) The movie attempts to portray space in a realistic way. Of course the technology looks thoroughly ridiculous to us now but this was done 60 years ago.
Socially it was of interest because of the relative equality between women and men. Equality between the sexes was a theme in Heinlein, and amazingly it made it into this very early movie.
The noted Sci Fi writer Richard Heinlein wrote the script. (He's more famous for Starship Troopers.) The movie attempts to portray space in a realistic way. Of course the technology looks thoroughly ridiculous to us now but this was done 60 years ago.
Socially it was of interest because of the relative equality between women and men. Equality between the sexes was a theme in Heinlein, and amazingly it made it into this very early movie.
Despite my hopes for suspense when the foreign baddies get a double agent aboard the rocket ship, there's hardly a touch of white-knuckles anywhere in the 63-minutes. Looks like director Talmadge specialized in stunts rather than dramatizing scripts, and it shows in the stretched out results with no edges. Then too, the much amended script doesn't help (IMDB). And get a load of Col. Briteis (bright eyes !), played by malt shop cutie Martell. So what if she leads the moonbase expedition in revealing beach party shorts and top. What the heck, It's like sending Gidget to Mars. At the same time, her eye-candy cuteness distracted me from most every serious scene. Talk about commercially inspired casting: it doesn't come any more obvious.
Sure, it's a cheap drive-in indie, so how much could be expected from the outset. Nonetheless, the special effects aren't that bad given budget constraints and outer space backdrops. Then too, production avoids Cold War stereotyping of bad guys into evil commie plotters in dark shadow. Instead, master-mind Roundtree is more robotic and brightly lit than evil. And how about that ridiculous moon base wedding imposed, I suspect, by the puritanical Production Code. Can't let two unmarrieds co-habit, even in a rocket ship. No wonder distinguished writer Heinlein disowned the results (IMDB). All in all, my advice is to let this sleepy 10-day production lie.
(In passing- Can't help noticing current US plans for an outer-space armada are titled 'Space Force', same as in the movie. And that's along with justifying rhetoric similar to the movie's. All in all, looks like the loony flick cast a forward shadow, after all. )
Sure, it's a cheap drive-in indie, so how much could be expected from the outset. Nonetheless, the special effects aren't that bad given budget constraints and outer space backdrops. Then too, production avoids Cold War stereotyping of bad guys into evil commie plotters in dark shadow. Instead, master-mind Roundtree is more robotic and brightly lit than evil. And how about that ridiculous moon base wedding imposed, I suspect, by the puritanical Production Code. Can't let two unmarrieds co-habit, even in a rocket ship. No wonder distinguished writer Heinlein disowned the results (IMDB). All in all, my advice is to let this sleepy 10-day production lie.
(In passing- Can't help noticing current US plans for an outer-space armada are titled 'Space Force', same as in the movie. And that's along with justifying rhetoric similar to the movie's. All in all, looks like the loony flick cast a forward shadow, after all. )
In the early '50s when real space travel was yet another 8 years in the future, this was average view of space travel for most people. In that paradigm, movie like this was a pretty standard format as a space rocket based stories.
Story's premise sound's ridiculous now that a rocket goes off course and can land on moon as an alternate plan and become the first people to land on the moon, but movie like this was never intended to be a serious science fiction. Some things were predicted accurately such as giant screen TV monitor, and forward thinking concept such as woman president of the country.
But let's get to the bottom line here. The only thing that's worth watching in this movie in my opinion is the beautiful Donna Martel. She looks great as the female astronaut. This movie would not be worth a watch without her.
Movie is a bit of cheese, but I find decent entertainment, and not a terrible movie to watch. I like this movie better than many of the rocket movies from this era such as Cat Woman of the Moon.
So, I wouldn't give a high rating, but it's an okay movie for this category.
Story's premise sound's ridiculous now that a rocket goes off course and can land on moon as an alternate plan and become the first people to land on the moon, but movie like this was never intended to be a serious science fiction. Some things were predicted accurately such as giant screen TV monitor, and forward thinking concept such as woman president of the country.
But let's get to the bottom line here. The only thing that's worth watching in this movie in my opinion is the beautiful Donna Martel. She looks great as the female astronaut. This movie would not be worth a watch without her.
Movie is a bit of cheese, but I find decent entertainment, and not a terrible movie to watch. I like this movie better than many of the rocket movies from this era such as Cat Woman of the Moon.
So, I wouldn't give a high rating, but it's an okay movie for this category.
After the United States builds a space station in outer space to protect itself against hostile missiles, America's enemies make it a high priority to get one of their agents on board the station in an attempt to destroy it. They soon come up with a plan to replace an esteemed scientist named "Dr. Wernher" (Larry Johns) with an exact duplicate and give him orders to hasten the station's destruction immediately. On a separate note, due to political considerations, an ambitious female pilot by the name of "Colonel Briteis" (Donna Martell) is given a high priority assignment of flying a rocket ship to the dark side of the moon which creates a great deal of animosity between her and the original pilot named "Major Bill Moore" (Ross Ford). To further add to the tension, Dr. Wernher's duplicate is also on board the same flight and seems to have developed an unusual interest in the rocket's navigation. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this campy sci-fi film probably won't rate too highly with modern viewers today based in large part to the lack of action and CGI. Additionally, the plot was predictable and the acting clearly second rate. Having said all of that, however, while it certainly won't measure up to today's standards, the special effects weren't all that bad considering the era in which this film was produced. Of course, the fact that this was one of the movies I used to enjoy as a kid also has some bearing on my feelings as well. Yet, as generous as I would like to be, I honestly cannot ignore the obvious flaws mentioned earlier and for that reason I have rated this film accordingly. Slightly below average.
I came across this 1953 movie on Free TV streaming. It is barely over 60 minutes long so isn't too much different from a one hour TV show.
I find it interesting that almost 70 years ago this work of fiction so accurately foreshadowed some of the things going on today, in 2022. There is a space station in orbit around the Earth and they accurately explain why a person feel weightless on it. They use magnetic shoes inside the space station and there are signs "please do not walk on the walls."
Also there is a proposal to build a station on the Moon, another thing our current Artemis program is headed towards. In this story a team of three are to orbit the Moon to photograph the back side. For some reason not completely explained they end up having to land there in a crater and then get inventive to establish radio contact with Earth.
One of the crew members was a female officer, a novelty for the early 1950s as relates to sending people in space. However, as with almost all pre-space movies the crew boards a few minutes before launch, and all are wearing short shorts and snug-fitting tee shirts, even the men. They just strap themselves onto cots and go.
The drama in this story involves a rogue group out to destroy the space station, they find a look-a-like to substitute for one of the scientists in the initial trip to the space station.
Judged by 21st century standards this is not a very good movie and the special effects are not realistic at all. Still I found it to be a worthwhile glimpse into a time when space exploration was still just a dream, and how fiction writers and movie producers envisioned how it might be.
I find it interesting that almost 70 years ago this work of fiction so accurately foreshadowed some of the things going on today, in 2022. There is a space station in orbit around the Earth and they accurately explain why a person feel weightless on it. They use magnetic shoes inside the space station and there are signs "please do not walk on the walls."
Also there is a proposal to build a station on the Moon, another thing our current Artemis program is headed towards. In this story a team of three are to orbit the Moon to photograph the back side. For some reason not completely explained they end up having to land there in a crater and then get inventive to establish radio contact with Earth.
One of the crew members was a female officer, a novelty for the early 1950s as relates to sending people in space. However, as with almost all pre-space movies the crew boards a few minutes before launch, and all are wearing short shorts and snug-fitting tee shirts, even the men. They just strap themselves onto cots and go.
The drama in this story involves a rogue group out to destroy the space station, they find a look-a-like to substitute for one of the scientists in the initial trip to the space station.
Judged by 21st century standards this is not a very good movie and the special effects are not realistic at all. Still I found it to be a worthwhile glimpse into a time when space exploration was still just a dream, and how fiction writers and movie producers envisioned how it might be.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThis was initially intended as a pilot film for a TV series to be called "Ring Around the Moon." When science-fiction movies suddenly became popular, producer Jack Seaman added enough footage to the film to bring it up to feature length. This was done without the knowledge of writer Robert A. Heinlein, and he disowned the result.
- PatzerAs the Magellan is landing on the moon and descending behind the rocks, the black arm that is connected to the left of the model can be seen blocking out the stars behind it as it lowers.
- Zitate
Col. Briteis: [after panicking over their predicament] Sorry for going female on you, Major.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Aweful Movies with Deadly Earnest: Project Moonbase (1969)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Project Moon Base?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Cat Woman on the Moon
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 3 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.33 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Project Moon Base (1953) officially released in India in English?
Antwort