Hogaraka ni ayume

Ozu is one of my top 3 directors and I have just loved all his movies I have seen till now except this one. "I Was Born, But..." which was made just 2 years after this movie was a delightful surprise. It was a comedy/drama centered around kids. Compared with that it feels like it is inspired from western movies. And Ozu's doesn't seems to have a developed a strong style of his own.

Ozu's later movies are very similar in topic to each other. But they are never clichéd. He delights in subverting the genres and breaking the established norms. But "Walk Cheerfully" is very clichéd. Yes, there are few Ozu touches but as such it is not an Ozu movie.

Of course this is just the start of his career. But it just goes to show me that even he made bad movies. This movie is average if you consider the time it was made in. But compared to other Ozu movies it is just awful. I wouldn't recommend this to his fans.

Kenji is a small thief who likes drinking and fighting. When he falls in love with sweet and simple Yazue, and she finds out what kind of guy he really is, she leaves him 'until he becomes an honest person'.

George Fox wrote: "Be patterns, be examples in all countries, places, islands, nations wherever you come; that your carriage and life may preach among all sorts of people, and to them; then you will come to walk cheerfully over the world, answering that of God in everyone; whereby in them you may be a blessing, and make the witness of God in them to bless you." How does that quote relate to the film? I am not entirely sure, though it seems to be the source of the title. Perhaps there is a deeper message. Regardless, Ozu made twenty-six movies in his first five years as a director (including this one), and this is a solid film. Who knew that Japan had American-style gangsters in the 1930s?

Nicely paced film, with an expected ending based on the obvious influences.

I don't know if I'm being too harsh on these early Yasujiro Ozu films, but they just haven't really been doing the job for me. I don't think the really early ones are anywhere close in quality to his later ones, and it's also hard to draw many comparisons between his very early films and those later ones.

Watching a filmmaker's early stuff can be rewarding, even if the films are flawed, if you can watch their style take shape... but in 1929/1930, I feel maybe it was still at least a few years away from happening for Ozu. I might try one more of his films from this era before going back to his later period; could well be worth watching a filmography like this backwards, who knows.

A genuine rarity, an Ozu gangster movie, in which a conman falls for one of his targets, achieving redemption through love in a way that is highly reminiscent of Frank Borzage's tales of romantic salvation. Ozu achieves a variety of moods, from the playful hand signals and spontaneous dance routines that gangsters use to greet each other, to the passion of not only romantic love but fraternal devotion between the conman and his best buddy, resulting in one of his most macho movies as well as one of his most tender. Incidentally, Ozu gives a lot of visual time in this film to close-up shots of people's feet, a motif I don't quite understand in its relation to the movie but is certainly striking.