Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA talented American actress enlists the help of the famed Belgian detective, Hercule Poirot, to negotiate a divorce from her husband, Lord Edgware, only to find him the next day stabbed to d... Alles lesenA talented American actress enlists the help of the famed Belgian detective, Hercule Poirot, to negotiate a divorce from her husband, Lord Edgware, only to find him the next day stabbed to death in his library. Who would want him dead?A talented American actress enlists the help of the famed Belgian detective, Hercule Poirot, to negotiate a divorce from her husband, Lord Edgware, only to find him the next day stabbed to death in his library. Who would want him dead?
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Fotos
Empfohlene Bewertungen
It's a cheap version of the novel, with acting honors to Richard Cooper as Hastings, largely for his ability to save a shot by turning an error, like catching his umbrella handle on a door, into a minor comic bit. The rest of it is almost uninterrupted talk, as Trevor asks seemingly irrelevant questions.
My issue with Agatha Christie is this: she could plot the heck out of a mystery, playing endlessly with the bits of the classic British form, but she couldn't write very well. Her characters are all stock types; Poirot, for example, is Belgian - called French here - because this would permit her to indulge in a few pat phrases to stand in for an actual character. Being Continental, he didn't matter. Her Americans are standard British Stage characters, yokels with money or dumb and predatory women. Her choice of words is repetitious.
Ah, but her plots, her machinations with locked rooms and impossible murderers! That's where she excelled. And that would be the case here, were it not that the film is structured so that there is a severely limited number of suspects, and Poirot simply has to eliminate them. When he points the finger, will the criminal admit it's a fair cop? Probably. That's what the English do, isn't it?
This is one of Christie's best books,in a golden decade ("the ABC murders ", " death on the nile " "death in the clouds","murder on the orient express ", 'the Tuesday club murders" ,ending with her triumph "and then were none" );if my memory serves me well , it's one sentence which makes the little gray cells discover the whole truth .
Written in 1933 ,the year before, it is anyway interesting for Christie's fans to see early movies based on her books;although not as good as "love from a stranger"(based on the short story "Philomel Cottage ), "lord Edgware dies " , it is ,for the time, an interesting adaptation.
Trevor may not physically be Poirot (no moustache,tall and not bald) ,but it's false to write there is no hint at Belgian :he has an accent and one can hear many French words in the dialog ( "mon cher ami" "mon Dieu",etc ) Hastings serves as a foil to him (it's his dr Watson),and when he hears that Lady Edgware might be a potential criminal, his tea goes down the wrong way .
Christie's fans should try and watch "the ninth guest" ,released the very same year ,not from one of her books, but contains the seeds of "and then there were none" .
I think it's easy to overlook that this was made back in 1934, I'm watching this almost eighty years on, and for the most part it's well made, competently acted, and actually pretty accurate, the likeness from the original text that is.
It's atmospheric, it flows well, I actually liked the staging. I felt that they captured the tone of the book, and as for the killer, I felt that they got them, and their motives spot on, not too sympathetic, but devious and cunning.
On the downside, the accents are enough to make Rene Artois blush, they are hilariously bad, Poirot sounds a little comical, Lady Edgware is inconsistent let's say, sadly the character of Hastings is an utter fool. Poirot, has no moustache, and isn't Belgian, I can imagine Christie had a few words to say about that.
I'd love to see this get a commercial release.
7/10.
There was a tv film starring Peter Ustinov and Faye Dunaway titled "Thirteen at Dinner."
In 2000, the Hercule Poirot series featured the story, starring David Suchet as Poirot.
Poirot endeavors to figure out how Lady Edgware killed Lord Edgware while she was at a dinner party. Two other murders follow the first.
In this film, Poirot - tall, slender, and unmoustached doesn't correct those who think he's French.
Passable and interesting. Not as detailed in the plot as Thirteen at Dinner. Still, it's a good story.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesPoirot's trademark of correcting people when they assume he is French is dropped in this film.
- PatzerAustin Trevor mispronounces Poirot's first name. In French names beginning with H (such as Hercule), the H is silent.
- Zitate
Hercule Poirot: Meantime Lord Edgware stands in the way of these romantic dreams.
Lady Edgware: Yeah. 'Course, if we were in Chicago, I could get him bumped off quite easily but you don't seem to run to gunmen over here.
Hercule Poirot: No, Madame. Here we consider human beings have a right to live. Even husbands.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Being Poirot (2013)
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Lord Edgware Dies?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 20 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1