Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuJoseph, a wealthy young Southern aristocrat, graduates from a seminary; before he takes charge of his assigned parish, he decides to go out and see what "the real world" is all about. He win... Alles lesenJoseph, a wealthy young Southern aristocrat, graduates from a seminary; before he takes charge of his assigned parish, he decides to go out and see what "the real world" is all about. He winds up in New Orleans and becomes attracted to Bessie, a poor, unsophisticated orphan girl.... Alles lesenJoseph, a wealthy young Southern aristocrat, graduates from a seminary; before he takes charge of his assigned parish, he decides to go out and see what "the real world" is all about. He winds up in New Orleans and becomes attracted to Bessie, a poor, unsophisticated orphan girl. One thing leads to another, and before long Bessie discovers that she is pregnant by Jose... Alles lesen
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 wins total
- 'Auntie' Easter
- (as Lucille Laverne)
- An Old Negro
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
** (out of 4)
Light melodrama about a preacher (Ivor Novello) who decides to "see the real world" before taking over his new church. While out he runs into a poor woman (Mae Marsh) and the two soon become lovers, which leaves her pregnant. After hearing she's pregnant, the preacher takes off and soon ends up with a rich girl (Carol Dempster) but fate might bring all three together. This is yet another moral tale from Griffith who wants again comes off very harsh on the rich while showing that the poor are the strong people of the world. I've seen over one hundred films from the director and it seems this is the type of film he always goes back to. The movie isn't too bad but it is rather bland in its execution, which means only Griffith die-hards should seek it out. Novello, who would go onto star in Hitchock's The Lodger, turns in a very good performance and his moral breakdown at the end is certainly the highlight of the film. Dempster is also fine in her role but I think this is one case where Griffith should have used her in the lead. Marsh, back with the director for the first time since Intolerance is decent in the later part of the film but suffers a little at the start due to what seems like a lack of direction. Towards the end of the film when the poor girl is kicked around by the rich, she takes shelter with the black folks who take her in as one of her own. This type of support for blacks was certainly rare in these days but that didn't stop them from having mostly whites play them (the preacher was played by a real black actor).
Anyhow, this is one of Griffith's worst films (that I've seen). It's contrived, overlong, overly sensational and plodding. Its morality tale is boring and ludicrous at times. Additionally, Mae Marsh certainly does lay it on thick with her ridiculous flapper imitation, and Carol Dempster continues to demonstrate no talent. There's some (comparatively) mild racist comedy based in degrading African Americans, too. On the other hand, and to say something favorably about the picture, the film-making isn't technically as slipshod, or unpolished, as in some of Griffith's other lesser films. Not recommended.
(Note: The print I saw was of poor quality, with bleached faces occasionally.)
And then there is Lucille La Verne as Auntie Easter, Dempster's "mammy". It is hard to tolerate Griffith's insistence of putting white actors in black face for African American roles - and his using these roles for low comic relief. Claims by some, including Lillian Gish, that Griffith was not racist are made a nonsense by this. Having said that it is impossible to deny that La Verne is excellent in the role, and that she shows more compassion to her fellow humans than the white characters do.
The performance of the film though is that of Mae Marsh. In the type of role normally played by Lillian Gish in Griffith films, Marsh proves herself to be the equal of Gish. She suffers with great beauty and emotional integrity - and she convincingly takes her character from innocent orphan girl, to town floozie (she is nick-named "Teazie"), to suffering single mother. It is one of the best silent era performances. How sad to note that in later years she was offered little more than extra work in movies.
And the film is so beautiful too - the rose symbol is used to great effect, and Bitzer's use of light and shadow is truly magical. This is a Griffith film that deserves serious reconsideration.
Meanwhile, far away in a suburb of New Orleans, plain "little" Mae Marsh (as Bessie Williams) leaves the orphan asylum she has called home, to make her own way in the world. She carries a exemplary letter of recommendation and naively thinks she's a "first class orphan" since she's had both a mother and a father. A brief job-hunting search lands Ms. Marsh a waitress position. To improve her customer relations, Marsh gets a modern haircut and learns to flirt with male customers like a "Jezebel". Her new wiggle arouses handsome Ivor Novello (as Joseph Beaugarde), who is planning to become a minister...
As both are wealthy young aristocrats, Mr. Novello is expected to marry Dempster (the female half of the couple initially introduced). Forgetting their separate social status, Novello and Marsh are mutually attracted, and spend a date cuddling and kissing. Although there is no on-screen indication any sexual intercourse occurred, Marsh turns up pregnant. As you'll see, it wasn't immaculate conception (which seems, for a time, a possibility). Marsh had acquired the nickname "Teazie" along with an undeserved reputation as a tramp. As an unwed mother, Marsh is thrown out on the streets...
There is a fine message about what could be considered genetic "mixing" in the story; it's made obvious by how the two couples eventually pair up. Note how writer/director D.W. Griffith has deliberately opposed the early statement, "The family came out of European nobility, taking great care in marriages to preserve the pure strain of aristocracy." The "pure strain" language, and ability Hamilton shows in overcoming his "heritage of shiftlessness," finds Griffith in a better place than his preceding reputation. Still, there is no real, defining extension of these ideals to the stereotypical "black-face" characters herein.
"The White Rose" had possibilities, but it really doesn't rise to the level of the prose he produced from 1918-1920. Robert Harron had died, and Lillian Gish had left her mentor (and would soon be appearing in the similarly titled "The White Sister" for Henry King). To his credit, Mr. Griffith did re-hire Marsh and cameraman Billy Bitzer. However, Marsh is not served well as a waif turned flapper. Regulars Dempster and Hamilton are joined by new arrival Novello. All have some good moments, but only Griffith player Charles Emmett Mack (a "guest") seems totally unaffected by the usual Griffith acting indulgences.
***** The White Rose (5/21/23) D.W. Griffith ~ Mae Marsh, Ivor Novello, Carol Dempster, Neil Hamilton
Her flapper, named Teazie, is meant to be a spoof of the 20s jazz babies known as flappers. Having come out of an orphanage, Teazie has to be taught how to primp and pose and vamp a man. Of course she's ridiculous because it's not her true nature. But the fact that the yokels fall for her vamp act is Griffith's comment on the phoniness of flappers and the stupidity of bumpkins.
One of the bumpkins gossips constantly about Teazie and convinces the preacher she's a tramp. He goes away after their one night together. She has the baby and is turned out of her job at the local inn. Despondent and starving she considers suicide but hangs on. But poverty and threats from others to turn her in and take away the baby take their toll. She becomes ill and lies dying when the preacher finally finds her. The ending is pure Griffith.
Marsh certainly ranks among the great early silent film actresses. She was much more expressive than Lillian Gish or Mary Pickford and sometimes now comes off as hammy, but she has moments in The White Rose where she is magnificent and matches her best work in The Birth of a Nation and Intolerance. Handsome Novello suffers nicely as the guilty clergyman and probably could have given Rudolph Valentino and Ramon Novarro a run for their money as a Hollywood Idol, but he worked mostly on stage in London. Carol Dempster (Griffith's protégé) is bland as the clergyman's friend. Neil Hamilton, despite good billing, has a small part as the poor boy trying to make good. Lucille Laverne is fun (in blackface) as Auntie Esther.
Despite its melodramatic nature and moralizing tones, Griffith still packs this film with great scenes and his trademark layered action (foreground and background). The DVD I have is also washed out (noted elsewhere in comments) and some faces appear as white blanks, but this is a 1923 film that has not been restored.
Little Mae Marsh, one of the first movie stars, certainly deserves to be remembered. But The White Rose was her last real shot at stardom, and as talkies came in her work in the teens was forgotten She worked in films in bit parts through the 60s. But to fans of silent cinema Mae Marsh ranks with the greats and deservedly so.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe original print was hand-tinted in soft pinks and greens.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Göttinnen der Liebe (1965)
Top-Auswahl
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 650.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 40 Minuten
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.33 : 1