IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,0/10
33.072
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Pilotin aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, die mit streng geheimen Dokumenten auf einer B-17 Flying Fortress reist, trifft an Bord des Fluges auf eine böse Präsenz.Eine Pilotin aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, die mit streng geheimen Dokumenten auf einer B-17 Flying Fortress reist, trifft an Bord des Fluges auf eine böse Präsenz.Eine Pilotin aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, die mit streng geheimen Dokumenten auf einer B-17 Flying Fortress reist, trifft an Bord des Fluges auf eine böse Präsenz.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 wins total
Ryan Cooper
- WWII Cartoon Narrator
- (Synchronisation)
- (Nicht genannt)
Joshua Marchant
- WWII Cartoon Airman
- (Synchronisation)
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Imagine a double feature. Imagine taking the powerful, claustrophobic WWII drama "Das Boot" (1981) and immediately following it with "Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus" (2009). Afterwards you can bet the cleaning crews will be scraping rancid vegetables off the movie screen all night. And, from the look of most reviews on imdb, that's how many viewers reacted to this flick.
"Shadow in the Cloud" is really 2 different movies, and if you plan on riding it all the way through without a dumpster full of rotten produce, you have to realize when it shifts. The first act is a powerful, minimalist drama which is really along the lines of "Das Boot" (a tense drama set entirely in a dark, cramped submarine). The entire first part of "Shadow" is just Chloë Grace Moretz stuck in a cramped 5ft square ball turret on the belly of a B-17 Flying Fortress. The camera remains exclusively on her as she delivers a fantastic performance that could've easily been a 1 act play.
But be prepared. Abruptly, the entire film shifts to an action packed popcorn flick. If you can swallow this, you'll have a wild ride all the way to the end. But if you continue expecting this film to be a heavy, realistic drama, you will certainly be as irritated as if a German U-Boat were to suddenly fly up into the sky and get eaten by a prehistoric shark. (For the record, I consider both "Das Boot" & "Mega Shark" to be masterpieces of cinematic genius.)
You may have noticed that I haven't said a word about the plot. That's deliberate. I was told to go into this film blindly, which I did, and maybe that's the key to swallowing all the twists, turns, and violations of the laws of physics that happen. I mean, hey, if we can accept that a dude can dress up as a bat with a Home Depot tool belt and save the world multiple times, why can't we have fun with a wildly inventive thriller set on a WWII airplane?
"Shadow in the Cloud" is really 2 different movies, and if you plan on riding it all the way through without a dumpster full of rotten produce, you have to realize when it shifts. The first act is a powerful, minimalist drama which is really along the lines of "Das Boot" (a tense drama set entirely in a dark, cramped submarine). The entire first part of "Shadow" is just Chloë Grace Moretz stuck in a cramped 5ft square ball turret on the belly of a B-17 Flying Fortress. The camera remains exclusively on her as she delivers a fantastic performance that could've easily been a 1 act play.
But be prepared. Abruptly, the entire film shifts to an action packed popcorn flick. If you can swallow this, you'll have a wild ride all the way to the end. But if you continue expecting this film to be a heavy, realistic drama, you will certainly be as irritated as if a German U-Boat were to suddenly fly up into the sky and get eaten by a prehistoric shark. (For the record, I consider both "Das Boot" & "Mega Shark" to be masterpieces of cinematic genius.)
You may have noticed that I haven't said a word about the plot. That's deliberate. I was told to go into this film blindly, which I did, and maybe that's the key to swallowing all the twists, turns, and violations of the laws of physics that happen. I mean, hey, if we can accept that a dude can dress up as a bat with a Home Depot tool belt and save the world multiple times, why can't we have fun with a wildly inventive thriller set on a WWII airplane?
First things first, if you complain about unbelievable things happening in a movie about gremlins attacking an airplane, you need to have your opinion license permanently revoked.
"Shadow in the Cloud" is obviously meant to be viewed as a simple comic book style rip-roaring WWII adventure to be enjoyed like a cheeseburger or a pint of ice cream and not to be deeply analyzed for plot depth and realism. The hordes of egotists falling over themselves to prove how "above it all" they are need to loosen up and switch to decaff. Yes, absolutely ludicrous things happen in this movie, and that's what makes it fun! Is everyone really so hopped up on dopamine from constantly scrolling through social media that they can't let go and enjoy a zany movie?
Chloe Moretz' performance was captivating and thrilling from start to finish. These are the kind of roles she was born to play and it was clear that she had an absolute blast making the movie. The rest of the cast were clearly there to be functional, forgettable cardboard cutouts, and the energy of the movie would have suffered if they'd been directed to draw attention away from the main character.
I'm confident that in a decade this movie will be found on film lists under the heading "Cult movies that were despised on release". I'd love to see a sequel!
"Shadow in the Cloud" is obviously meant to be viewed as a simple comic book style rip-roaring WWII adventure to be enjoyed like a cheeseburger or a pint of ice cream and not to be deeply analyzed for plot depth and realism. The hordes of egotists falling over themselves to prove how "above it all" they are need to loosen up and switch to decaff. Yes, absolutely ludicrous things happen in this movie, and that's what makes it fun! Is everyone really so hopped up on dopamine from constantly scrolling through social media that they can't let go and enjoy a zany movie?
Chloe Moretz' performance was captivating and thrilling from start to finish. These are the kind of roles she was born to play and it was clear that she had an absolute blast making the movie. The rest of the cast were clearly there to be functional, forgettable cardboard cutouts, and the energy of the movie would have suffered if they'd been directed to draw attention away from the main character.
I'm confident that in a decade this movie will be found on film lists under the heading "Cult movies that were despised on release". I'd love to see a sequel!
Knowing nothing about it, I was mildly interesting at the introduction to the movie's premise and the competent hook, quality production and good camera-work! That is.. until it it all becomes a little too much, and ultimately crumbles into nonsense.
Seeing the name of "max landis" as one of the co-writers (alongside the female director) makes complete sense now, and should help deter anyone from even pressing Play. He's simply NOT a talented or competent screenwriter.. and the deliberate choice of elements that wrap around a poorly executed message are beyond his capability for composition. This is first and foremost a female-centric movie with a not-so-hidden agenda. Chloë Grace Moretz gives a decent performance, but the script is noticeable "handled", making it difficult to stay engaged with it.
The alternate World War context was a good setting, and being confined to a ball turret was intriguing! This is eventually abandoned, but remains the best piece of the pie.
Additionally, the film's blending of action and horror elements feels forced (like its core), and ultimately adds nothing to the overall narrative.. Specifically the cheap homage to a "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet" Twilight Zone episode, with a fictional horror-monster plot that is laughably tacked-on! Specially when used as the climax of the story and as stand-in or outlet for all the lead's "venting".. I assume it probably makes sense to someone out there.
The rest of the cast is underutilized and their characters obnoxious or useless.
I'm beyond surprised this got the backing and support that it did.
Can't recommend it! Unless a fan of Chloe.. as it doesn't deliver on its potential.
Seeing the name of "max landis" as one of the co-writers (alongside the female director) makes complete sense now, and should help deter anyone from even pressing Play. He's simply NOT a talented or competent screenwriter.. and the deliberate choice of elements that wrap around a poorly executed message are beyond his capability for composition. This is first and foremost a female-centric movie with a not-so-hidden agenda. Chloë Grace Moretz gives a decent performance, but the script is noticeable "handled", making it difficult to stay engaged with it.
The alternate World War context was a good setting, and being confined to a ball turret was intriguing! This is eventually abandoned, but remains the best piece of the pie.
Additionally, the film's blending of action and horror elements feels forced (like its core), and ultimately adds nothing to the overall narrative.. Specifically the cheap homage to a "Nightmare at 20,000 Feet" Twilight Zone episode, with a fictional horror-monster plot that is laughably tacked-on! Specially when used as the climax of the story and as stand-in or outlet for all the lead's "venting".. I assume it probably makes sense to someone out there.
The rest of the cast is underutilized and their characters obnoxious or useless.
I'm beyond surprised this got the backing and support that it did.
Can't recommend it! Unless a fan of Chloe.. as it doesn't deliver on its potential.
I read the synopsis before I realized Grace morritze is in it and I thought the premise sounded dreadful. After watching the trailer I thought I didn't have anything to lose by watching it. Turns out i lost brain cells, as it's laughably bad, so much so I had to watch it to the end, as I was incredulous and curious about wether it would improve, but it just got more odd.
I think it's meant to be 80's B movie bad, hence the heavy synth music and poor effects. I really hope that's the case as it just got weirder by the minute. Everything was poor; the script, the heavy handed misogyny, the acting (at one point Chloe reprimanded her colleagues for their remarks and she sounds like a teacher telling kids off, rather than an authoritive soldier), the effects (apart from the dog fights, they were cool), the storyline was terrible, just awful.
I really hope I missed something and this was supposed to be a homage to old camp ott 80's horror, because if not I'm concerned about everyone's career in this. I'm sure there was a message about the indomitable spirit of womanhood, "girls can do stuff now" and the lengths we will go to protect our own, despite the blatant sexism and misogyny we experience and the odds being stacked against us, but if so it was jammed right in our faces and we were bludgeoned with it.
It could also be viewed as a comedy as there are so many "oh, come on!" moments, my eyes rolled so hard they nearly popped out of my head. If you watch this do not take it seriously,, and you might just make it.
I think it's meant to be 80's B movie bad, hence the heavy synth music and poor effects. I really hope that's the case as it just got weirder by the minute. Everything was poor; the script, the heavy handed misogyny, the acting (at one point Chloe reprimanded her colleagues for their remarks and she sounds like a teacher telling kids off, rather than an authoritive soldier), the effects (apart from the dog fights, they were cool), the storyline was terrible, just awful.
I really hope I missed something and this was supposed to be a homage to old camp ott 80's horror, because if not I'm concerned about everyone's career in this. I'm sure there was a message about the indomitable spirit of womanhood, "girls can do stuff now" and the lengths we will go to protect our own, despite the blatant sexism and misogyny we experience and the odds being stacked against us, but if so it was jammed right in our faces and we were bludgeoned with it.
It could also be viewed as a comedy as there are so many "oh, come on!" moments, my eyes rolled so hard they nearly popped out of my head. If you watch this do not take it seriously,, and you might just make it.
Bad script, so bad, I am not sure how it went to production with so much nonsense that makes no sense and just doesn't work.
The acting was pretty nice by most actors and there were good moments, nice cgi. Script absolutely ruined the movie. Could've been a blockbuster if they just reworked it a bit( it is not that hard, I can clearly see about 10 possibilities without even thinking about it)
4.6/10
4.6/10
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe animated segment at the beginning of the film is based on Private Snafu, a series of adult-oriented instructional shorts meant to educate enlisted personnel on army discretion, hygiene, combat readiness and daily life. They were produced between 1943 and 1945, and given that they were not meant to be public, were free from censorship restrictions. The title character, parodied in the film, comes from the military acronym "Situation Normal, All Fucked Up".
- PatzerThe B-17's ball turret couldn't be entered from inside the aircraft when it was on the ground, as it required the ball turret guns to be pointed downward for the hatch to be opened and there wasn't enough clearance between the aircraft and the ground to do so.
- Zitate
Maude Garrett: I was being polite!
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 820: Dune + Squid Game (2021)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Una sombra en la nube
- Drehorte
- Tamaki Makaurau, Auckland, Neuseeland(on location)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 10.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 156.932 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 39.117 $
- 3. Jan. 2021
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.054.290 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 23 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen