Inside the Mind of a Serial Killer

The episodes are very drawn out and suffocated in speculation.

Saw season one and thought very informative. Really liked the female psychologist they used in each episode. The only thing I didn't like is in every episode it seemed (at least toward the end of the season) they would ask will this serial killer (insert name) kill that victim (insert name) or let them go. It was always yes so that became annoying and repetitive.

Papadopoulos as part of the cast screams FRAUD, CHARLATAN & FOOL. Her best accomplishment was publishing a 'paper' (fit for the one-holer) that determined unhappiness was due to a 'pleasure' deficit.

I've really been into the forensic shows and naturally I followed with other crime series shows. This was a great idea with lots of good tapes to make a great series. The first thing that pissed me off was this so called psychiatrist that has an anoying way of over acting as she interprets the criminal and tapes. Then the narrator with his accent is just as annoying. What is with everyone these days thinking we're better off with a narrator that's hard to understand? This show would be fine if you modeled it after a show like Forensic Files. Even get that narrator and only use psychologists that know the case. This is just a waste of good material and research.

First of all, you can see that the speakers are reading their text on some kind of panel next to the camera. It really gets on your nerve and it's insulting. I hated all of them profoundly. They're all so obnoxious.

The "fill-ups" of the sketch artist drawing a face probably fills at least half of the show and it got me violent. It was so boring and repetetive. Also, they speculate more then they share any useful information. They're so biased.

If you want to produce a true crime show, take this one as an example of what not to do. Worst show. It didn't cost me anything to watch it and I still feel I want a refund.