IMDb-BEWERTUNG
8,0/10
40.606
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Aida ist als Übersetzerin für die UNO in der Kleinstadt Srebrenica tätig. Als die serbische Armee die Stadt übernimmt, gehört ihre Familie zu den Tausenden von Bürgern, die im UN-Lager Unter... Alles lesenAida ist als Übersetzerin für die UNO in der Kleinstadt Srebrenica tätig. Als die serbische Armee die Stadt übernimmt, gehört ihre Familie zu den Tausenden von Bürgern, die im UN-Lager Unterschlupf suchen.Aida ist als Übersetzerin für die UNO in der Kleinstadt Srebrenica tätig. Als die serbische Armee die Stadt übernimmt, gehört ihre Familie zu den Tausenden von Bürgern, die im UN-Lager Unterschlupf suchen.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Für 1 Oscar nominiert
- 40 Gewinne & 43 Nominierungen insgesamt
Zusammenfassung
Reviewers say 'Quo Vadis, Aida?' is a powerful, harrowing film about the Srebrenica massacre, praised for impactful storytelling and strong performances, especially Jasna Duricic as Aida. It critically examines the United Nations' failure and explores themes of war and survival. While lauded for emotional depth and historical significance, some criticize perceived inaccuracies and over-dramatization. It is considered an important, though challenging, film that highlights a significant historical event.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I am a guy from Serbia and I gave this movie 10/10 because it has really good script and it is true work of art. I wish directors from Serbia would make more films which are as good as this one.
The Bosnian entry for the Best International Feature Academy Award, "Quo Vadis, Aida?" is better than the odds-on favorite to actually win the Oscar, "Druk" (a.ka. "Another Round," 2020), being that it's actually about something that matters and is emotionally devastating--so much so that the eponymous Aida literally begs to make a Sophie's Choice at one point. The protagonists in both are teachers, and neither one ultimately affects any real change, but one is living history while the other rambles to high-schoolers about his famous favorite fellow drunkards. Both pictures are alienating: this one forcing us to witness the horrific Srebrenica massacre that we're unable to alter, and the other makes one feel like the designated driver to a bunch of binge-drinking dolts whining about their so-called mid-life crises. As opposed to waiting impatiently to drive the inebriated teachers home, however, "Quo Vadis, Aida?" does well to pull the spectator into the chaos. There's nary a dull moment in following Aida (as played rivetingly well by Jasna Duricic--seriously, Academy, you missed a nominee) around a makeshift UN refugee camp as she frantically tries to save the lives of her husband and two sons from the approaching slaughter by Ratko Mladic's Bosnian Serb Army and as the United Nations and their so-called, shorts-wearing peace keepers impotently stand by and refuse to help.
I want to note, too, that Aida being a translator, or interpreter, as the case may be (that "piano player" as "messenger" part early on, e.g.), makes for an interesting dynamic in the subtitling of the picture, among other things--much of it disregarded as unnecessary because of it. There's actually a good deal of English here beside other languages. Another good reason for the Oscar category name change from "Foreign Language Film" to "International Feature."
Additionally, amid all that, writer-director Jasmila Zbanic and company also do something reflexively interesting cinematically. While the real war is nothing more than a one-sided genocide slaughtering Bosniak Muslim males, there's another battle here for the cinematic control of the narrative. On one side, there's Mladic with the cameraman he continually tells what to shoot, and who in return reassures the would-be convicted war criminal that he'll fix his inane monotony with montage. We never see that film here, though--only its making from the outside, where its propagandistic lies are all the more apparent. And, on the other side, we have the faces of the people in the outer, film proper that is "Quo Vadis, Aida?" We see this in intermittent series of return gazes--of people looking directly, or close to, at the camera and, thus, us, the audience. They're the victims of the genocide within the narrative and, as the case may be, interpreting the real tragedy onto the screen, but through these return gazes, seize control of the narrative. This is their movie.
I want to note, too, that Aida being a translator, or interpreter, as the case may be (that "piano player" as "messenger" part early on, e.g.), makes for an interesting dynamic in the subtitling of the picture, among other things--much of it disregarded as unnecessary because of it. There's actually a good deal of English here beside other languages. Another good reason for the Oscar category name change from "Foreign Language Film" to "International Feature."
Additionally, amid all that, writer-director Jasmila Zbanic and company also do something reflexively interesting cinematically. While the real war is nothing more than a one-sided genocide slaughtering Bosniak Muslim males, there's another battle here for the cinematic control of the narrative. On one side, there's Mladic with the cameraman he continually tells what to shoot, and who in return reassures the would-be convicted war criminal that he'll fix his inane monotony with montage. We never see that film here, though--only its making from the outside, where its propagandistic lies are all the more apparent. And, on the other side, we have the faces of the people in the outer, film proper that is "Quo Vadis, Aida?" We see this in intermittent series of return gazes--of people looking directly, or close to, at the camera and, thus, us, the audience. They're the victims of the genocide within the narrative and, as the case may be, interpreting the real tragedy onto the screen, but through these return gazes, seize control of the narrative. This is their movie.
*Why this film*- This was nominated for the 2021 Best Foreign Film Academy Award, which it lost to Another Round.
Also, I am reading America and the Problem of Hell - an account of genocides of the 20th century. The last genocide that the book extensively talks about, is of the Bosnian Muslims by the Serbians, at Srebrenica. This is set smack in the middle of that tumultuous time.
*What I liked about it* - The pacing and the scripting. It is 100 minute long and packs so much in that century. The chief protagonist, Aida, a UN translator, might be the one of the most true flesh-and-blood characters written for screen. Her personal and professional battles form the crux. The UN soldiers, tasked with enforcing truce between the Bosnians and the Serbs and the Serbian warlords, intent on capturing the city and relocating its citizens are vividly drawn. The acting is so natural that you feel at times that you are watching a documentary, rather than a thriller.
It reminded me of our very own _The Kashmir Files_ at times. The terror that you are being hunted just for your religious identity, is as real here, as it was there. The brutality, much of it off screen here, would make your fertile imagination churn up many scenarios. It is telling that this was sent to the Academy Award by the country whereas The Kashmir Files was reviled by a section of the intelligentsia and political class as conjecture and not fact based.
This is a great film and is surely going to be seared in the memories of those who choose to watch it.
Also, I am reading America and the Problem of Hell - an account of genocides of the 20th century. The last genocide that the book extensively talks about, is of the Bosnian Muslims by the Serbians, at Srebrenica. This is set smack in the middle of that tumultuous time.
*What I liked about it* - The pacing and the scripting. It is 100 minute long and packs so much in that century. The chief protagonist, Aida, a UN translator, might be the one of the most true flesh-and-blood characters written for screen. Her personal and professional battles form the crux. The UN soldiers, tasked with enforcing truce between the Bosnians and the Serbs and the Serbian warlords, intent on capturing the city and relocating its citizens are vividly drawn. The acting is so natural that you feel at times that you are watching a documentary, rather than a thriller.
It reminded me of our very own _The Kashmir Files_ at times. The terror that you are being hunted just for your religious identity, is as real here, as it was there. The brutality, much of it off screen here, would make your fertile imagination churn up many scenarios. It is telling that this was sent to the Academy Award by the country whereas The Kashmir Files was reviled by a section of the intelligentsia and political class as conjecture and not fact based.
This is a great film and is surely going to be seared in the memories of those who choose to watch it.
It was an ongoing debate in my family if we should watch the movie or not. My mother is from Srebrenica and we lost a huge part of our family and amongst them my grandpa. The wounds are still open and will be no matter how long time passes and my mother's memories are still as vivid as if it was yesterday. Having seen a few bad movies left us not wanting to se another one on that subject because directors ( particularly Jolie) tried in a way to romanticize the war even though there is NOTHING ROMANTIC about that war. A huge loss, suffering and vivid memories of near friend and family being killed and tortured is something that my mother lives with daily. So I watched the movie first and later we saw it together. And it hits you to the core. I think that Jasmila Zbanic accomplished something great by leaving out horror scenes and making us just imagine. Because no scene can ever compare with the reality of crime and horrors that happened. In a few segments of the movie we had to pause because they felt so real to my mother that she started to look for my grandpa in the scenes with people outside the UN zone hq. We highly recommend everyone to see this movie and to never forget about Srebrenica.
Nominated for Best International Feature Film at the last Oscars, Quo vadis, Aida follows a UN translator's plight to save her family from imminent death in the wake of Bosnian War and also covers the events that led to the Srebrenica massacre. A powerful, heartbreaking & devastating account of human injustice & global apathy, this Bosnian war drama is one of the best films of its year.
Written & directed by Jasmila Zbanic, the drama centres around a fictional family in the middle of a real-life conflict but through their predicament, it effectively captures the utter despair & helplessness the refugees faced, not only from their persecutors but also from their supposed saviours. Zbanic lays bare the grave incompetence of United Nations whose lack of action only ended up enabling the wholesale killings.
Zbanic makes sure the family the story focuses on looks & feels as real & authentic as possible, and the drama she conjures around them is compelling throughout. It's disturbing to watch UN delegates failing to do the one thing their organisation exists for and how they simply stood aside as mere spectators after letting the fox into the henhouse. Jasna Duricic leads from the front with an outstanding performance and she is strongly supported by the rest.
Overall, Quo vadis, Aida is a brutal, harrowing & profoundly upsetting example of its genre that provides a scorching account of the lifetime of pain & trauma that warfare leaves behind and also exposes the failure & indifference of the international council that indirectly pave the way for such atrocities. Bringing the horrors of Srebrenica to screen with cut-throat intensity and leaving us shattered with its gut-punching finale, this Bosnian war film is essential viewing by all means. In a word, unforgettable!
Written & directed by Jasmila Zbanic, the drama centres around a fictional family in the middle of a real-life conflict but through their predicament, it effectively captures the utter despair & helplessness the refugees faced, not only from their persecutors but also from their supposed saviours. Zbanic lays bare the grave incompetence of United Nations whose lack of action only ended up enabling the wholesale killings.
Zbanic makes sure the family the story focuses on looks & feels as real & authentic as possible, and the drama she conjures around them is compelling throughout. It's disturbing to watch UN delegates failing to do the one thing their organisation exists for and how they simply stood aside as mere spectators after letting the fox into the henhouse. Jasna Duricic leads from the front with an outstanding performance and she is strongly supported by the rest.
Overall, Quo vadis, Aida is a brutal, harrowing & profoundly upsetting example of its genre that provides a scorching account of the lifetime of pain & trauma that warfare leaves behind and also exposes the failure & indifference of the international council that indirectly pave the way for such atrocities. Bringing the horrors of Srebrenica to screen with cut-throat intensity and leaving us shattered with its gut-punching finale, this Bosnian war film is essential viewing by all means. In a word, unforgettable!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesJasna Djuricic, who plays the main role, is the wife of Boris Isakovic, who plays general Mladic. They often work together in film and theater, but in this film they don't share any scenes.
- Zitate
Aida Selmanagic: We are on the list!
- VerbindungenFeatured in Die 93. Oscar-Verleihung (2021)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Where are you going, Aida?
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 4.500.000 € (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 813.253 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 41 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen