Eine verzweifelte Schriftstellerin meldet sich zu einem vollständig von der KI gesteuerten Rückzugsort an, um ihre Schreibblockade zu überwinden, aber als eine unvorhergesehene Softwarepanne... Alles lesenEine verzweifelte Schriftstellerin meldet sich zu einem vollständig von der KI gesteuerten Rückzugsort an, um ihre Schreibblockade zu überwinden, aber als eine unvorhergesehene Softwarepanne auftritt, wird sie in ihrer Einheit gefangen.Eine verzweifelte Schriftstellerin meldet sich zu einem vollständig von der KI gesteuerten Rückzugsort an, um ihre Schreibblockade zu überwinden, aber als eine unvorhergesehene Softwarepanne auftritt, wird sie in ihrer Einheit gefangen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 5 Gewinne & 12 Nominierungen insgesamt
- News Anchor
- (Synchronisation)
- Claire's Agent
- (Synchronisation)
- News Reporter
- (Synchronisation)
- The Retreat's Emergency Recording
- (Synchronisation)
- Telephone Voice
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
You can't stop watching this movie if you believe what's happening, because it's a bit unbelievable. But, if you don't believe it, that means there's some incredible conspiracy going on. And yet, the longer you watch it, the more it goes on down that path you can't believe, the more it just seems like it really will never end, like maybe the truth is something else. So, you keep going back and forth from "it's a conspiracy" to "it's an apocalyptic coincidence" to "is this all in her head???"
The poor reviews and low rating of this movie are very predictable, the way most people sadly are, and the way this movie is in no way. The handful of people who made this movie really were incredibly brave.
Most people today just want something that is predictable and entertaining, quickly rejecting anything that is not formulaic, not a remake, not a sequel in an established franchise. This movie is none of those things.
It is unique, from beginning to end.
And that is it - The end never happens. The story suddenly ends leaving viewers with no answers at all for dozens of questions that are relevant and obvious for any film - How can an AI operated center stop working, and no one attends to it for one month or even more? What had happened if Claire didn't finish the story - would supplies have all been consumed and she die starving? There is bound to be some human supervisor somewhere keeping tabs on how long the supplies are going to lost and he/ she should have been worried about occupied rooms and should have come enquiring. Whether the novel get published? How was it received by readers? Did she publish it under her mother's name to make amends?
Actually, I had thought that the entire Rita's "I cannot open the door till the story is finished" thing is actually the center's method to force Claire to write up the story, to bring anxiety to her, to bring depression to her, so that she is forced to overcome her writer's block. But that was not so. The film just ended.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesTo make Rita the AI Assistant appear flawless compared to the lead, the casting team picked an actress 19 years junior but made her wear old fashioned style clothing.
- PatzerRita accuses Claire of plagiarising The Count of Monte Criste and tells her it is illegal. The Count of Monte Cristo is in the public domain. However, plagiarism isn't simply copying another's work, it is passing it off as one's own ; which Claire was doing ( if only to a murderous, malfunctioning android ).
- Zitate
Claire Rivers: [after telling Rita about her suicidal thought] Anyway it didn't really matter. No more lines means
[long pause]
Claire Rivers: no more future. Which means nothing bad can happen. Right?
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Blank?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Android A.I. - Künstliche Intelligenz, die tödlich ist
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 34 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1